Generating Sentential Arguments from Diverse Perspectives on Controversial Topic (D19-50)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | ArgDiver model generates high-quality sentential arguments from multiple perspectives . retrieval-based systems do not have sufficient flexibility for input with missing keywords or topics unseen . |
| Approach: | They propose a neural method to generate sentential arguments from multiple perspectives . their model generates high-quality sentential argument, but shows higher diversity . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model generates high-quality sentential arguments from multiple perspectives . it shows that it can provide diverse perspectives on a controversial topic . |
Similar Papers
Aspect-Controlled Neural Argument Generation (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current argument generation models produce lengthy texts and allow the user little control over the aspect the argument should address. |
| Approach: | They propose a language model that can be controlled to generate sentence-level arguments for a given topic, stance, and aspect. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model generates high-quality arguments for argumentation and counter-arguments. |
Perspective-driven Preference Optimization with Entropy Maximization for Diverse Argument Generation (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument generation with diverse perspectives is essential for fostering balanced discourse and mitigating bias. |
| Approach: | They propose a Perspective-aware Preference Optimization with Entropy Maximization framework for diverse argument generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enhances perspective diversity through preference optimization based on the constructed preference dataset . |
Conclusion-based Counter-Argument Generation (2023.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on the automatic generation of natural language counter-arguments does not address the relation to the conclusion, possibly because many arguments leave their conclusion implicit. |
| Approach: | They propose a multitask approach that jointly learns to generate both the conclusion and the counter of an input argument. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach generates more relevant and stance-adhering counters than strong baselines. |
Neural Argument Generation Augmented with Externally Retrieved Evidence (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for generating arguments are limited to retrieval-based methods. |
| Approach: | They propose an encoder-decoder-based argument generation model enriched with externally retrieved evidence from Wikipedia. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model generates arguments with more topic-relevant content than current models based on automatic evaluation and human assessments on a large-scale dataset from reddit. |
Exploring Quality and Diversity in Synthetic Data Generation for Argument Mining (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument Mining (AM) is hindered by the scarcity of structure-annotated datasets, which are expensive to create manually. |
| Approach: | They propose to use quality-oriented synthesis and diversity-oriented approach to generate argumentative texts with diverse topics and argument structures. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach significantly improves existing models in full-data and low-resource settings. |
Argument Generation with Retrieval, Planning, and Realization (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a novel argument generation framework is used to generate counter-arguments . CANDELA uses a text planning decoder to retrieve arguments of different perspectives . |
| Approach: | They propose a powerful retrieval system and a novel two-step argument generation framework . they use a retrieval-based retrieval platform indexed with 12 million articles from Wikipedia . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework yields higher BLEU, ROUGE, and METEOR scores than state-of-the-art models. |
How Far Can We Extract Diverse Perspectives from Large Language Models? (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances of large language models have gained much interest from researchers to exploit their capability of creative generation for data augmentation with less cost and higher diversity. |
| Approach: | They propose a criteria-based prompting technique to extract maximum diversity from LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method extracts diverse opinions from large language models iteratively. |
AEG: Argumentative Essay Generation via A Dual-Decoder Model with Content Planning (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on argument generation focus on generating individual short arguments, while research on generating long and coherent argumentative essays is under-explored. |
| Approach: | They propose a task to automatically generate argumentative essays using a writing prompt. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model generates persuasive essays with higher diversity and less repetition compared to baselines. |
Argue with Me Tersely: Towards Sentence-Level Counter-Argument Generation (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Jiayu Lin, Rong Ye, Meng Han, Qi Zhang, Ruofei Lai, Xinyu Zhang, Zhao Cao, Xuanjing Huang, Zhongyu Wei
| Challenge: | Existing work describes paragraph-level counter-argument generation task as paragraph-based . however, sentence-level generation can be quite different due to its unique constraints and brevity-focused challenges. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark framework for sentence-level counter-argument generation . they use an annotated debate forum dataset to generate high-quality counter-argments . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework and evaluator are competitive in counter-argument generation tasks. |
Belief-based Generation of Argumentative Claims (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to generate argument with the ability to encode beliefs are limited by the noise generated by the automatic collection of bag-of-words. |
| Approach: | They propose to augment argument generation technology with ability to encode beliefs . they model users' beliefs via their stances on big issues and extend text generation models with extra input reflecting user's beliefs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach is low in effectiveness because of the noise produced by the automatic collection of bag-of-words. |