LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformers (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models with better representations of visual content and language have been developed for visual-content understanding. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to learn vision-and-language connections from Transformers models . they pre-train a large-scale Transformer model with large amounts of image-and sentence pairs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves state-of-the-art on two visual-reasoning tasks by 22% . the proposed model is based on a large-scale Transformer model with three encoders . |
Similar Papers
VECO: Variable and Flexible Cross-lingual Pre-training for Language Understanding and Generation (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work in multilingual pretraining relies on the shared vocabulary and bilingual contexts to encourage the correlation across languages. |
| Approach: | They propose to plug a cross-attention module into a Transformer encoder to explicitly build the interdependence between languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on XTREME and English-to-French translation datasets. |
Vision-and-Language or Vision-for-Language? On Cross-Modal Influence in Multimodal Transformers (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pretrained vision-and-language BERTs aim to learn representations that combine information from both modalities. |
| Approach: | They propose a diagnostic method based on cross-modal input ablation to assess the extent to which pretrained models integrate cross-module information. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method evaluates the model's performance on the other modality based on inputs from one or both modality. |
Do Vision-and-Language Transformers Learn Grounded Predicate-Noun Dependencies? (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study examines whether vision-and-language models learn syntactic dependencies . a controlled evaluation of the models is crucial for a precise and rigorous test of their knowledge . |
| Approach: | They propose a task to evaluate understanding of predicate-noun dependencies in a controlled setup. |
| Outcome: | This study compares state-of-the-art models with a case study on predicate-noun dependencies. |
Transformer-Exclusive Cross-Modal Representation for Vision and Language (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a number of approaches to crossmodal representation have been used, but transformer architecture has taken over the recurrent neural networks in natural language processing tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use transformer architecture to handle cross-modal representations for vision and language with compatible performance to convolutional neural networks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms recurrent neural networks in vision and language representations with transformer architecture. |
X-LXMERT: Paint, Caption and Answer Questions with Multi-Modal Transformers (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has adapted vision-and-language models to generative tasks like image captioning. |
| Approach: | They propose an extension to LXMERT with training refinements to generate images from text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate images from pieces of text while still being comparable to existing models. |
Word Representation Learning in Multimodal Pre-Trained Transformers: An Intrinsic Evaluation (2021.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for linguistic representations of words are based on information extracted from large text corpora, and the sensory-motor experiences humans have with the world play an important role in determining word meaning. |
| Approach: | They propose to use contextualized word representations to learn semantic representations of words that align with human semantic intuitions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are shown to be more efficient on concrete word pairs than on abstract ones. |
CTAL: Pre-training Cross-modal Transformer for Audio-and-Language Representations (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing audio-language task-specific predictive approaches focus on building complicated late-fusion mechanisms. |
| Approach: | They propose a cross-modal transformer for audio-and-language that learns inter-modal connections between audio and language through two proxy tasks on a large amount of audio- and-language pairs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on multiple audio-and-language tasks and can be used in fine-tuning phase. |
Attention as Grounding: Exploring Textual and Cross-Modal Attention on Entities and Relations in Language-and-Vision Transformer (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work has focused on what is captured by multi-modal architectures. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-modal transformer that learns syntactic and semantic representations about entities and relations grounded in objects at the level of masked self-attention and cross-modal attention. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model learns syntactic and semantic representations about objects and relations cross-modally and unimodally. |
Learning Deep Transformer Models for Machine Translation (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural machine translation models have advanced the previous state-of-the-art by learning mappings between sequences via neural networks and attention mechanisms. |
| Approach: | They propose to use layer normalization to pass the combination of previous layers to the next layer to improve the model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the shallow Transformer-Big/Base baseline model on English-German and Chinese-English tasks by 0.4-2.4 BLEU points. |
Adaptive Transformers for Learning Multimodal Representations (2020.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches for learning visiolinguistic representations with transformers are over-parametrized and require extensive training. |
| Approach: | They propose to extend attention spans, sparse, and structured dropout methods to learn more about how the network perceives the complexity of input sequences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approaches improve on language semantics and visiolinguistic representations, but are often over-parametrized and require large amounts of computation. |