| Challenge: | Variational Autoencoders are powerful language models and effective representation learning frameworks. |
| Approach: | They propose a fix for posterior collapse which improves held-out likelihood, reconstruction and latent representation learning . |
| Outcome: | The proposed fix significantly improves held-out likelihood, reconstruction, and latent representation learning compared with previous state-of-the-art methods. |
Similar Papers
Addressing Posterior Collapse with Mutual Information for Improved Variational Neural Machine Translation (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing variational inference models ignore their latent variables, a phenomenon called posterior collapse. |
| Approach: | They propose a new loss function for conditional variational autoencoders that counteracts posterior collapse by using a modified evidence lower bound objective and a factorized decoder. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model yields improved translation quality compared to existing models on WMT RoEn and DeEn. |
Scale-VAE: Preventing Posterior Collapse in Variational Autoencoder (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Variational autoencoder (VAE) is a widely used generative model . but when employing strong autoregressive generation networks, VAE tends to converge to a degenerate local optimum known as posterior collapse. |
| Approach: | They propose a model called Scale-VAE to solve a posterior collapse problem . they use a factor to keep the posterior dimension discriminative across data instances . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art models in density estimation and representation learning. |
On the Encoder-Decoder Incompatibility in Variational Text Modeling and Beyond (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work has shown that the optimization of variational autoencoders suffers from the posterior collapse problem. |
| Approach: | They propose a variational autoencoder that couples a VAE model with a deterministic autoencoding model and improves the parameters via weight sharing and decoder signal matching. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on benchmark datasets and improves diversity of dialogue generation. |
Generative Text Modeling through Short Run Inference (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Latent variable models for text capture global semantic and syntactic features when trained correctly. |
| Approach: | They propose a short run dynamics for inference that initializes from the prior distribution of the latent variable and runs a small number of Langevin dynamics steps guided by its posterior distribution. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is able to generate coherent sentences with smooth transition and shows no sign of posterior collapse. |
Implicit Deep Latent Variable Models for Text Generation (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Variational auto-encoders have been used for text generation but their representation power is limited due to two reasons. |
| Approach: | They advocate sample-based representations of variational distributions for natural language . they further develop an LVM to directly match the aggregated posterior to the prior . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be viewed as a natural extension of VAEs with a regularization of maximizing mutual information, mitigating the "posterior collapse" issue. |
A Batch Normalized Inference Network Keeps the KL Vanishing Away (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is widely used to approximate a model’s posterior on latent variables. |
| Approach: | They propose to let the Kullback–Leibler divergence individual follow a distribution across the whole dataset and analyze that it is sufficient to prevent posterior collapse by keeping the expectation of the KL’s distribution positive. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach can avoid posterior collapse effectively and efficiently without introducing any new model component or modifying the objective. |
Effective Estimation of Deep Generative Language Models (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing techniques for parameterisation of probabilistic models by deep neural networks are difficult to use in language modelling due to posterior collapse. |
| Approach: | They propose to use variational auto-encoder to estimate probabilistic models of language by deep neural networks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs reasonably well given enough resources, but a favourite can be named based on convenience. |
Empirical Prior for Text Autoencoders (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Variational Autoencoders (VAE) are used to train generative models with latent variables. |
| Approach: | They propose a transition from Variational Autoencoders (VAE) to text autoencodeurs (AE) which model a compact latent space and preserves the capability of the language model itself. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method generates higher quality and more diverse text than the VAE-based Transformer baselines, and is more efficient than previous approaches. |
On the Importance of the Kullback-Leibler Divergence Term in Variational Autoencoders for Text Generation (D19-56)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Variational Autoencoders suffer from learning uninformative latent representations due to issues such as approximated posterior collapse or entanglement of the latent space. |
| Approach: | They propose to impose an explicit constraint on the Kullback-Leibler divergence term inside the VAE objective function to understand the significance of the KL term in controlling the information transmitted through the VAe channel. |
| Outcome: | The proposed constraint avoids posterior collapse, but it also controls the information transmitted through the VAE channel. |
Neural Gaussian Copula for Variational Autoencoder (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Variational language models assume the posterior of latent variables to be factorized even when the true posterior is not. |
| Approach: | They propose a Gaussian Copula Variational Autoencoder to avert a typical training problem called posterior collapse observed in all other variational language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves great success over a huge number of tasks, such as transfer learning, unsupervised learning and unsupervised training. |