Is Chain-of-Thought Reasoning of LLMs a Mirage? A Data Distribution Lens (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Chengshuai Zhao, Zhen Tan, Pingchuan Ma, Dawei Li, Bohan Jiang, Yancheng Wang, Yingzhen Yang, Huan Liu
| Challenge: | Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been shown to be effective in eliciting structured reasoning from large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a data distribution lens to understand when and why CoT reasoning fails . they propose 'data-based' training that trains LLMs from scratch . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model enables models to generate reasoning trajectories that approximate those observed during training. |
Similar Papers
How Likely Do LLMs with CoT Mimic Human Reasoning? (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using chain-of-thought to elicit reasoning capabilities is not always effective and accurate. |
| Approach: | They compare the reasoning process of LLMs with humans to understand the causal chain . they find that LLM deviates from the ideal causal chain, resulting in spurious correlations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method does not improve performance or accurately represent reasoning processes in LLMs. |
Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matters (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting can dramatically improve the multi-step reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose to use Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting to encourage the LLM to generate intermediate rationales for solving a problem by providing a series of reasoning steps in the demonstrations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate coherent lines of reasoning even with invalid demonstrations while still generating coherent lines during inference. |
Decoupling the Effect of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Human Label Variation Perspective (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reasoning-tuned large language models (LLMs) with long Chain-of-Thought excel at single-answer tasks, yet their ability to model Human Label Variation remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They conduct systematic disentanglement experiments to isolate the effect of reasoning text from intrinsic model priors on distribution-based tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves distributional alignment, but distributional ranking is governed by model priors. |
Explainable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: An Empirical Analysis on State-Aware Reasoning Dynamics (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Sheldon Yu, Yuxin Xiong, Junda Wu, Xintong Li, Tong Yu, Xiang Chen, Ritwik Sinha, Jingbo Shang, Julian McAuley
| Challenge: | Recent advances in chain-of-thought prompting have demonstrated the ability of large language models to perform multi-step reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to analyze latent dynamics of CoT trajectories for interpretability . they segment generated CoT into discrete reasoning steps and abstract each step into a spectral embedding based on token-level Gram matrices . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework segments generated CoT steps into discrete reasoning steps, abstracts each step into a spectral embedding based on token-level Gram matrices, and clusters these embeddements into semantically meaningful latent states. |
Chain-of-Thought Prompting Obscures Hallucination Cues in Large Language Models: An Empirical Evaluation (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting can mitigate hallucinations by encouraging step-by-step reasoning, but its impact on halluciation detection remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They conduct an empirical evaluation of CoT prompting in Large Language Models (LLMs) to examine their impact on hallucination detection methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly affects the internal states and token probability distributions of the LLM. |
A Closer Look at Bias and Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness of Large (Vision) Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chain-of-thought reasoning improves performance of large language models, but is it faithfully reflecting internal processes? |
| Approach: | They propose a new evaluation pipeline for categorizing bias articulation patterns and a novel evaluation pipeline to examine CoT faithfulness in large vision-language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation pipeline enables significantly more precise analysis of CoT reasoning than previous methods. |
Deciphering the Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Chain-of-Thought: Probability, Memorization, and Noisy Reasoning (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been shown to enhance the multi-step reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose to use CoT prompting to analyze a symbolic reasoning task where letters are shifted forward some number of steps in the alphabet. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on a symbolic reasoning task, with three LLMs performing the task using CoT prompts. |
ReEfBench: Quantifying the Reasoning Efficiency of LLMs (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for Chain-of-Thought evaluations do not distinguish between genuine reasoning and mere verbosity. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for the non-intrusive, comprehensive process-centric evaluation of reasoning grounded in First-Order Logic. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework identifies four distinct behavioral prototypes and diagnoses the failure modes. |
Beyond Chain-of-Thought: A Survey of Chain-of-X Paradigms for LLMs (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive reasoning abilities when prompted with Chain-of-Thought (CoT). |
| Approach: | They propose to categorize Chain-of-X methods by taxonomies of nodes, i.e., the X in CoX, and application tasks, and then categorise them by taxanomies and discuss potential future directions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are categorised by taxonomies of nodes, i.e., the X in CoX, and application tasks. |
Look Light, Think Heavy: What Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Can and Cannot Do (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing open-source models often yield only marginal overall improvements, possibly due to an overemphasis on mathematical reasoning at the expense of broader capabilities. |
| Approach: | They evaluate 12 multimodal tasks using 14 non-reasoning models and 8 reasoning models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is effective in multimodal reasoning tasks, the authors show . they show that it lacks the ability to maintain deep visual introspection throughout the reasoning process. |