Challenge: Recent long-thought reasoning models adopt extended reasoning processes similar to how humans ponder over complex problems.
Approach: They propose a model that uses RL-style fine-tuning to reduce inference overhead while maintaining accuracy.
Outcome: The proposed model reduces inference overhead while maintaining accuracy.

Similar Papers

Too Long, Do Re-weighting for Efficient LLM Reasoning Compression (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently achieved remarkable progress on complex reasoning tasks by leveraging extended Chain-of-Thought (CoT) techniques.
Approach: They propose a method that uses Extended Chain-of-Thought (EFT) to reduce the number of output tokens by nearly 40% while maintaining the accuracy of the reasoning.
Outcome: The proposed method reduces the number of output tokens by nearly 40% while maintaining the accuracy of the reasoning.
Correct, Concise and Complete: Multi-stage Training For Adaptive Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) increase test-time computation, often in the form of chain-of-thought (CoT) however, reasoning traces can become unnecessarily long, increasing computation costs without improving accuracy and sometimes even degrading performance.
Approach: They propose a multi-stage efficient reasoning method that combines supervised fine-tuning with reinforcement learning using an adaptive length penalty.
Outcome: The proposed method reduces response length by an average of 28% for 8B models and 40% for 32B models while incurring only minor performance drops of 1.6 and 2.5 points, respectively.
Beyond Token Length: Step Pruner for Efficient and Accurate Reasoning in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing reinforcement learning methods for large reasoning models suffer from excessive verbosity, known as "overthinking." Existing models penalize generated tokens to promote conciseness, but these methods encounter two challenges: they may develop hacking behavior in later stages of training by discarding reasoning steps.
Approach: They propose a framework that steers large reasoning models toward more efficient reasoning . they prioritize correctness while imposing penalties for redundant steps .
Outcome: The proposed framework reduces token usage by 69.7% on AIME24.
One Missing Piece for Open-Source Reasoning Models: A Dataset to Mitigate Cold-Starting Short CoT LLMs in RL (2025.acl-industry)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing large reasoning models are limited by their closed nature and high API costs and safety issues.
Approach: They propose to build a long CoT dataset with existing short CoT LLMs that are not trained for inference-time scaling.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves quality comparable to—or slightly below—R1 and is able to think longer and provide control over the thought budget to better manage the overthinking problem.
Unlocking Recursive Thinking of LLMs: Alignment via Refinement (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for recursive reasoning are limited due to lack of expert-curated data.
Approach: They propose a method that unlocks the potential of Large Language Models for recursive reasoning through long-form Chain of Thought.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms preference optimization methods on the openAI o1-series models by 20% on 3k synthetic samples.
Fine-Tuning on Diverse Reasoning Chains Drives Within-Inference CoT Refinement in LLMs (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to generate multiple independent CoTs, combining them through ensembling or other post-hoc strategies, have been shown to be effective in boosting performance.
Approach: They propose a method where LLMs are fine-tuned to generate a sequence of Diverse Chains of Thought (DCoT) within a single inference step.
Outcome: The proposed model can generate multiple chains of thought within a single inference step without external feedback.
Your Reasoning Model Knows What Counts: Self-Guided Chain-of-Thought Pruning for Efficient Reasoning (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to Chain-of-Thought reasoning are often degraded because they disregard the model’s intrinsic reasoning dependency.
Approach: They propose a self-guided pruning framework that leverages the model’s intrinsic likelihood landscape to identify segments that are extraneous to its specific reasoning pattern.
Outcome: The proposed framework reduces output length while maintaining or improving accuracy on multiple benchmarks.
Structured Pruning for Diverse Best-of-N Reasoning Optimization (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Extensive experiments on the MATH dataset demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms traditional best-of-N and random head selection strategies.
Approach: They propose a contrastive learning framework that dynamically selects the optimal head and layer to prune during inference by aligning question embeddings with head embedds.
Outcome: The proposed approach outperforms best-of-N and random head selection strategies on the MATH500 and GSM8K datasets.
Optimizing Length Compression in Large Reasoning Models (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Reasoning Models suffer from producing unnecessary and verbose reasoning chains.
Approach: They propose a post-training method that uses a Length Reward and a Compress Reward to remove the invalid portion of the thinking process.
Outcome: The proposed method reduces sequence length by 50% with only a marginal (2%) drop in accuracy.
Think Clearly: Improving Reasoning via Redundant Token Pruning (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent large language models show promising capabilities in long-form reasoning . however, they tend to include substantial redundancy in reasoning paths .
Approach: They propose a structure-aware pruning method that prioritizes removing redundant tokens . they remove redundant token and then resume the reasoning generation .
Outcome: The proposed method shows strong performance on reasoning-intensive benchmarks without training.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations