Challenge: Existing methods for molecular optimization do not leverage domain feedback and historical knowledge with reasoning traces and chemical insights.
Approach: They propose a conversational molecular optimization pipeline that enables LLMs to accumulate and retrieve past actions, rationales, and feedback.
Outcome: The proposed framework transforms LLMs from passive text generators into agentic experts that learn both actions and reasoning from experience.

Similar Papers

A Survey of Large Language Models for Text-Guided Molecular Discovery: From Molecule Generation to Optimization (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) are introducing a paradigm shift in molecular discovery by enabling text-guided interaction with chemical spaces through natural language and symbolic notations.
Approach: They analyze the current LLM learning paradigms to tackle four critical evaluation dimensions that have emerged as critical dimensions in recent studies.
Outcome: The proposed models are able to interact with chemical spaces through natural language and symbolic notations, and have emerging extensions to incorporate multi-modal inputs.
LLMs for Bayesian Optimization in Scientific Domains: Are We There Yet? (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models have been proposed as general-purpose agents for experimental design . eval: LLMs show no sensitivity to experimental feedback.
Approach: They propose a method that combines LLM prior knowledge with nearest-neighbor sampling to guide the design of experiments.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms classical methods in the design of experiments.
Structural Reasoning Improves Molecular Understanding of LLM (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown significant performance, approaching human perception levels.
Approach: They propose an approach that sketches molecular structures for reasoning by explicitly incorporating key structural features into the model.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves molecular understanding through extensive experiments.
Less for More: Enhanced Feedback-aligned Mixed LLMs for Molecule Caption Generation and Fine-Grained NLI Evaluation (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent trends have led to the use of multimodal models to learn molecular and linguistic representations, either in separate but coordinated spaces or in a common space.
Approach: They propose a novel atomic-level evaluation method leveraging off-the-shelf Natural Language Inference (NLI) models for use in the unseen chemical domain.
Outcome: The proposed method surpasses state-of-the-art models in the unseen chemical domain while relying on a granularity-based evaluation method.
RL-Guider: Leveraging Historical Decisions and Feedback for Drug Editing with Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: RLs can be used to refine drugs by iterative conversations with domain experts . existing methods do not leverage past knowledge, but human experts develop intuition over time through historical experience .
Approach: They propose a reinforcement-learning agent to provide suggestions to large language models . RL-Guider leverages the “world-level” knowledge of LLMs and historical feedback .
Outcome: a new reinforcement-learning agent improves the performance of large language models . the proposed agent leverages the “world-level” knowledge of LLMs and historical feedback .
LLM2: Let Large Language Models Harness System 2 Reasoning (2025.naacl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Empirical results on mathematical reasoning benchmarks substantiate the efficacy of Large language models (LLMs).
Approach: They propose a framework that combines an LLM with a process-based verifier to generate plausible candidates and provide timely process-driven feedback to distinguish desirable and undesirable outputs.
Outcome: Empirical results show that LLM2 improves accuracy on GSM8K and self-consistency increases major@20 accuracy.
Exploiting Edited Large Language Models as General Scientific Optimizers (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for solving optimization problems in scientific scenarios use observational feedback as additional textual descriptions, but these methods struggle to utilize it effectively.
Approach: They propose a generalized approach to boost mathematical optimization in scientific scenarios by using observational feedback from LLMs as additional textual descriptions.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods on six different tasks using six different LLM backbones.
Injecting Domain-Specific Knowledge into Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: specialized LLMs are often limited in domain-specific applications that require specialized knowledge.
Approach: They provide a comprehensive overview of four key methods to enhance large language models by integrating domain-specific knowledge.
Outcome: The proposed methods are categorized into four key approaches: dynamic knowledge injection, static knowledge embedding, modular adapters, and prompt optimization.
DIVKNOWQA: Assessing the Reasoning Ability of LLMs via Open-Domain Question Answering over Knowledge Base and Text (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Retrievalaugmented LLMs have been used to ground LLM in external knowledge . a gap exists in the current landscape regarding the effectiveness of grounding LLM on heterogeneous knowledge sources.
Approach: They propose a model that uses symbolic language to generate symbolic queries . they use a dataset that is generated using predefined reasoning chains and human annotation .
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms previous approaches by a significant margin in QA tasks over text.
Current Advances in LLM Reasoning (2026.acl-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: This tutorial examines comprehensive evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) advanced inference time methods and post-training methods that aim to make LLMs think more like humans are discussed in this tutorial.
Approach: This tutorial explores comprehensive evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) and discusses two types of methods to improve models’ reasoning: advanced inference time methods, structured and self-improvement inference methods, and post-training methods, such as RLHF, DPO, and GRPO.
Outcome: This tutorial examines evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models and discusses two types of methods to improve models’ reasoning.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations