Exposing Numeracy Gaps: A Benchmark to Evaluate Fundamental Numerical Abilities in Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Haoyang Li, Xuejia Chen, Zhanchao Xu, Darian Li, Nicole Hu, Fei Teng, Yiming Li, Luyu Qiu, Chen Jason Zhang, Li Qing, Lei Chen
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on linguistic competence or structured mathematical problem-solving, neglecting fundamental numerical reasoning required in real-world scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate numerical capabilities for large language models . they use a dataset to assess number recognition, arithmetic operations, contextual retrieval, comparison, summary, and multi-step reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates six fundamental numerical capabilities: number recognition, arithmetic operations, contextual retrieval, comparison, summary, and multi-step reasoning. |
Similar Papers
MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmark (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Hongwei Liu, Zilong Zheng, Yuxuan Qiao, Haodong Duan, Zhiwei Fei, Fengzhe Zhou, Wenwei Zhang, Songyang Zhang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have showcased significant improvements in mathematics, but traditional benchmarks like GSM8k offer a unidimensional perspective. |
| Approach: | MathBench is a benchmark that rigorously assesses the mathematical capabilities of large language models. |
| Outcome: | MathBench spans a wide range of mathematical disciplines, offering a detailed evaluation of both theoretical understanding and practical problem-solving skills. |
Evaluating Numeracy of Language Models as a Natural Language Inference Task (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enhanced their capabilities to solve mathematical problems, but other aspects of numeracy remain underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose to frame numeracy as a Natural Language Inference task to assess the models’ ability to understand both numbers and language contexts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms smaller models in arithmetic tasks, indicating that mathematical reasoning cannot be generalized to other numeracy skills such as number comparison and normalization. |
PyraMathBench: Evaluating and Improving Mathematical Capability in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Numerical reasoning is ubiquitous in scientific research and financial analysis, but few benchmarks evaluate them by integrating numerical processing and mathematical reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a numerically-integrated hierarchical benchmark with 27,215 questions derived from 7,404 math word problems that spans 4 key cognitive aspects, 14 subcategories, and 2 modalities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves Qwen-2.5 score with SOLVE and IRPO training. |
ScholarBench: A Bilingual Benchmark for Abstraction, Comprehension, and Reasoning Evaluation in Academic Contexts (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | ScholarBench evaluates domain-specific knowledge of large language models (LLMs) prior benchmarks lack the scalability to handle complex academic tasks. |
| Approach: | ScholarBench evaluates the academic reasoning ability of large language models . the benchmark is constructed through a three-step process . |
| Outcome: | ScholarBench evaluates the academic reasoning ability of large language models . the benchmark comprises 5,031 examples in Korean and 5,309 examples in English . |
LLMs for Mathematical Modeling: Towards Bridging the Gap between Natural and Mathematical Languages (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across various natural language processing tasks, but their proficiency in mathematical reasoning remains a key challenge. |
| Approach: | They propose a process-oriented framework to evaluate LLMs' ability to construct mathematical models, using solvers to compare outputs with ground truth. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates LLMs' ability to construct mathematical models, using solvers to compare outputs with ground truth. |
NumGLUE: A Suite of Fundamental yet Challenging Mathematical Reasoning Tasks (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Swaroop Mishra, Arindam Mitra, Neeraj Varshney, Bhavdeep Sachdeva, Peter Clark, Chitta Baral, Ashwin Kalyan
| Challenge: | Existing AI systems fail to perform basic mathematical reasoning when presented in a slightly different manner. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-task benchmark that evaluates the performance of AI systems on eight different tasks that at their core require simple arithmetic understanding. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compares the performance of AI systems on eight different tasks. |
BenchMAX: A Comprehensive Multilingual Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multilingual benchmarks focus primarily on language understanding tasks. |
| Approach: | They develop a multi-way multilingual benchmark that measures critical capabilities of large language models across languages. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on BenchMAX reveal uneven utilization of core capabilities across languages, emphasizing the performance gaps that scaling model size alone does not resolve. |
Metric Calculating Benchmark: Code-Verifiable Complicate Instruction Following Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent frontier-level LLMs have saturated many previously difficult benchmarks, leaving little room for further differentiation. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate whether LLMs can execute string-matching NLP metrics by strictly following step-by-step instructions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that they can perform step-by-step execution, instruction adherence, numerical computation, and long-range consistency in handling intermediate results. |
The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Seungone Kim, Juyoung Suk, Ji Yong Cho, Shayne Longpre, Chaeeun Kim, Dongkeun Yoon, Guijin Son, Yejin Cho, Sheikh Shafayat, Jinheon Baek, Sue Hyun Park, Hyeonbin Hwang, Jinkyung Jo, Hyowon Cho, Haebin Shin, Seongyun Lee, Hanseok Oh, Noah Lee, Namgyu Ho, Se June Joo, Miyoung Ko, Yoonjoo Lee, Hyungjoo Chae, Jamin Shin, Joel Jang, Seonghyeon Ye, Bill Yuchen Lin, Sean Welleck, Graham Neubig, Moontae Lee, Kyungjae Lee, Minjoon Seo
| Challenge: | a recent study evaluated language models using abstract evaluation criteria that lack the flexibility and granularity of human assessment. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate nine distinct language models' capabilities . they use instance-specific evaluation criteria to mirror human evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates nine distinct capabilities of language models across 77 tasks. |
Exposing the Achilles’ Heel: Evaluating LLMs Ability to Handle Mistakes in Mathematical Reasoning (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations focus on final accuracy, neglecting the critical aspect of reasoning capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate LLMs’ abilities to detect and correct reasoning mistakes by using rule-based methods and smaller language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models such as GPT-4o and GPT4 in both accuracy and accuracy, but lacks data contamination and memorization concerns. |