SafetyALFRED: Evaluating Safety-Conscious Planning of Vision Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Josue Torres-Fonseca, Naihao Deng, Yinpei Dai, Shane Storks, Yichi Zhang, Rada Mihalcea, Casey Kennington, Joyce Chai
| Challenge: | Existing safety evaluations focus on hazard recognition through disembodied question answering (QA) settings, but lack a critical gap in evaluating an agent. |
| Approach: | They evaluate multimodal large language models with six categories of kitchen hazards . they propose a safety-based approach that prioritizes multi-step corrective actions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can recognize hazards in QA settings, but average mitigation success rates are low . the proposed model is based on the embodied agent benchmark ALFRED . |
Similar Papers
When Helpers Become Hazards: A Benchmark for Analyzing Multimodal LLM-Powered Safety in Daily Life (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xinyue Lou, Xu Jinan, Jingyi Yin, Xiaolong Wang, Zhaolu Kang, null Liaoyouwei, Yixuan Wang, Xiangyu Shi, Fengran Mo, SU Yao, Kaiyu Huang
| Challenge: | Safety impact of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on human behavior is evaluated in this study. |
| Approach: | They propose a safety-warning-based evaluation framework that encourages models to provide clear and informative safety warnings, rather than generic refusals. |
| Outcome: | The proposed safety-warning-based evaluation framework encourages models to provide clear and informative safety warnings, rather than generic refusals. |
Can’t See the Forest for the Trees: Benchmarking Multimodal Safety Awareness for Multimodal LLMs (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Wenxuan Wang, Xiaoyuan Liu, Kuiyi Gao, Jen-tse Huang, Youliang Yuan, Pinjia He, Shuai Wang, Zhaopeng Tu
| Challenge: | Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have expanded the capabilities of traditional language models by enabling interaction through both text and images. |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal safety awareness benchmark to evaluate MLLMs across 29 safety scenarios with 1,500 carefully curated image-prompt pairs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is able to identify unsafe content and avoid over-sensitivity that can hinder helpfulness. |
MADRA: Multi-Agent Debate for Risk-Aware Embodied Planning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing safety alignment methods, such as RLHF, fall into a Safety-Utility Trade-off, resulting in severe over-rejection of benign household instructions. |
| Approach: | They propose a meta-cognitive Critical Agent that evaluates peer debates using a structured argumentation framework derived from the Toulmin Model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed architecture outperforms existing systems in the SafeAware-VH benchmark. |
Subtle Risks, Critical Failures: A Framework for Diagnosing Physical Safety of LLMs for Embodied Decision Making (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yejin Son, Minseo Kim, Sungwoong Kim, Seungju Han, Jian Kim, Dongju Jang, Youngjae Yu, Chan Young Park
| Challenge: | Existing safety evaluations rely on coarse success rates and domain-specific setups, making it difficult to diagnose why and where these models fail. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for systematically evaluating the physical safety of LLMs in embodied decision making. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework assesses the physical safety of LLMs in embodied decision making. |
MTMCS-Bench: Evaluating Contextual Safety of Multimodal Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing contextual safety benchmarks are mostly single-turn and miss how malicious intent can emerge gradually or how the same scene can support both benign and exploitative goals. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates contextual safety in multimodal large language models . they observe persistent trade-offs between contextual safety and utility . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model combines multi-turn and multi-switch scenarios to evaluate safety in multimodal large language models. |
USB: A COMPREHENSIVE AND UNIFIED SAFETY EVALUATION BENCHMARK FOR MULTIMODAL LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Baolin Zheng, Guanlin Chen, Qingyang Teng, Hongqiong Zhong, Yingshui Tan, Zhendong Liu, Weixun Wang, Jiaheng Liu, Jian Yang, Huiyun Jing, Jincheng Wei, Wenbo Su, Xiaoyong Zhu, Bo Zheng, Kaifu Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing safety benchmarks fail to provide reliable assessments due to limited risk coverage, insufficient scale and the oversight of complex modality combinations. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that covers 61 risk categories across four modality interactions to address this gap. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework covers 61 risk categories across four distinct modality interactions. |
VestaBench: An Embodied Benchmark for Safe Long-Horizon Planning Under Multi-Constraint and Adversarial Settings (2025.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing safety benchmarks do not represent a diverse range of multi-constraint tasks that require long-horizon planning with a focus on safety. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess the safety of embodied AI agents under multiple constraints. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that LLMs perform poorly against their tasks . they also suffer significantly compromised safety outcomes . |
VLN-MME: Diagnosing MLLMs as Language-guided Visual Navigation Agents (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal Large Language Models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across vision-language tasks, but their performance as embodied agents needs further exploration. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate multimodal large language models as zero-shot agents . they find that enhancing prevalent agents with Chain-of-Thought reasoning and self-reflection leads to an unexpected performance decrease. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enables comparisons and component-level ablations across diverse MLLM architectures, agent designs, and navigation tasks. |
MHSafeEval: Role-Aware Interaction-Level Evaluation of Mental Health Safety in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks assess isolated responses using coarse-grained taxonomies or static datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose a role-aware mental health safety taxonomy that characterizes clinically significant harm in terms of interactional roles an AI counselor adopts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework significantly improves failure-mode coverage and diagnostic granularity. |
The Side Effects of Being Smart: Safety Risks in MLLMs’ Multi-Image Reasoning (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Renmiao Chen, Yida Lu, Shiyao Cui, Xuan Ouyang, Victor Shea-Jay Huang, Shumin Zhang, Chengwei Pan, Han Qiu, Minlie Huang
| Challenge: | Recent advances in multimodal reasoning may pose new safety risks . evaluators neglect reasoningbased safety, where harm emerges only through MLLMs . |
| Approach: | They introduce a benchmark for multi-image reasoning safety that includes 2,676 instances . they find that models with more advanced multi- image reasoning are more vulnerable . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark consists of 2,676 instances covering 9 multi-image relations . the results show that models with more advanced multi- image reasoning are more vulnerable . |