Benchmarking Temporal Reasoning and Alignment Across Chinese Dynasties (2026.eacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing temporal reasoning benchmarks rely on rule-based construction and lack contextual depth . a recent study found existing LLMs struggle with nuanced temporal understanding . |
| Approach: | a benchmark is designed to evaluate LLMs on temporal reasoning in Chinese dynasties. |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark evaluates LLMs on temporal reasoning across Chinese dynasties . it emphasizes cross-entity relationships, pairwise temporal alignment, contextualized and culturally-grounded reasoning . results show existing LLM benchmarks struggle with nuanced temporal understanding . |
Similar Papers
TimeBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Temporal Reasoning Abilities in Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Grasping the concept of time is a fundamental facet of human cognition. |
| Approach: | They propose a hierarchical temporal reasoning benchmark that covers a broad spectrum of temporal phenomena. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark shows that state-of-the-art LLMs are still far behind humans in temporal reasoning . |
Do Language Models Have a Common Sense regarding Time? Revisiting Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in the Era of Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Temporal reasoning is a vital component of human communication and understanding, yet remains an underexplored area within the context of Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose to use 3 prompting strategies to evaluate 8 different LLMs across 6 datasets and 2 Code Generation LMs to perform the analysis. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform better on NLP tasks than the standard models on the same dataset. |
Temporal Referential Consistency: Do LLMs Favor Sequences Over Absolute Time References? (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing efforts to ensure temporal consistency in large language models are lacking in time-sensitive fields . temporal reasoning is essential for time- sensitive fields such as finance and healthcare . a new benchmark aims to improve temporal referent consistency of LLMs . |
| Approach: | They propose a temporal referential consistency benchmark with a resource TEMP-ReCon to assess LLMs across temporal references. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves LLMs' temporal consistency by comparing them to baseline models. |
Living in the Moment: Can Large Language Models Grasp Co-Temporal Reasoning? (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current temporal reasoning datasets are limited to questions about single or isolated events, falling short in mirroring the realistic temporal characteristics involving concurrent nature and intricate temporal interconnections. |
| Approach: | They propose a co-temporal Question Answering benchmark that contains four co-time scenarios with 4,748 samples for evaluating the co-timing abilities of large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that current LLMs struggle on CoTempQA tasks even when enhanced with Chain of Thought methodologies. |
Perceive the Passage of Time: A Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Model in Temporal Relativity (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Temporal perception is crucial for Large Language Models to understand the world. |
| Approach: | They propose a temporal-relative ability benchmark to evaluate LLMs' temporal perception . they conduct extensive experiments on popular LLM GPT-4 scenarios . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show a significant performance gap between LLMs and humans in temporal-relative capability. |
Temporal Token Matters: Investigating and Interpreting the Consistency of Temporal Ordering in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit notable deficiencies in temporal reasoning . phrasing changes can lead LLMs to produce inconsistent outputs . |
| Approach: | They investigate the mechanistic interpretability of temporal ordering within event temporal reasoning . they identify a sparse subset of attention heads that are causally responsible for reasoning outcomes . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms other models in a variety of tasks and is validated by intervention-based experiments. |
DateLogicQA: Benchmarking Temporal Biases in Large Language Models (2025.naacl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | DateLogicQA examines temporal biases in Large Language Models (LLMs) 190 questions are curated by humans to examine temporal reasoning across date formats and contexts . |
| Approach: | They propose a human-curated benchmark of 190 questions specifically designed to understand temporal bias in Large Language Models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset covers seven date formats across past, present, and future contexts . it examines four reasoning types: commonsense, factual, conceptual, and numerical . |
AlignBench: Benchmarking Chinese Alignment of Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xiao Liu, Xuanyu Lei, Shengyuan Wang, Yue Huang, Andrew Feng, Bosi Wen, Jiale Cheng, Pei Ke, Yifan Xu, Weng Lam Tam, Xiaohan Zhang, Lichao Sun, Xiaotao Gu, Hongning Wang, Jing Zhang, Minlie Huang, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang
| Challenge: | Effective evaluation of alignment for emerging Chinese LLMs is still significantly lacking, calling for real-scenario grounded, open-ended, challenging and automatic evaluations tailored for alignment. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-dimensional benchmark for evaluating LLMs’ alignment in Chinese with 8 main categories, 683 real-scenario rooted queries and corresponding human verified references. |
| Outcome: | The benchmark uses a human-in-the-loop data curation pipeline, 683 real-scenario rooted queries and human verified references. |
Beyond Timestamps: Bridging Forward and Backward Reasoning in Temporal Numerical and Relational Understanding (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for Temporal Numerical and Relational reasoning rely on single-task evaluation paradigms. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate Temporal Numerical and Relational reasoning . they propose QA and verification, and a Consistency Rate to quantify robustness . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates both Temporal Numerical and Relational reasoning . it measures the alignment between QA and FV and the Consistency Rate measures robustness across these directions. |
EvolveBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Temporal Awareness in LLMs on Evolving Knowledge (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have explored how LLMs perceive time, but they often overlook the critical aspect of knowledge utilization. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates temporal competence along five key dimensions: Cognition, Awareness, Trustworthiness and reasoning. |
| Outcome: | EvolveBench measures temporal competence along five key dimensions: Cognition, Awareness, Trustworthiness, Understanding and reasoning. |