TimeBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Temporal Reasoning Abilities in Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Grasping the concept of time is a fundamental facet of human cognition. |
| Approach: | They propose a hierarchical temporal reasoning benchmark that covers a broad spectrum of temporal phenomena. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark shows that state-of-the-art LLMs are still far behind humans in temporal reasoning . |
Similar Papers
Perceive the Passage of Time: A Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Model in Temporal Relativity (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Temporal perception is crucial for Large Language Models to understand the world. |
| Approach: | They propose a temporal-relative ability benchmark to evaluate LLMs' temporal perception . they conduct extensive experiments on popular LLM GPT-4 scenarios . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show a significant performance gap between LLMs and humans in temporal-relative capability. |
EvolveBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Temporal Awareness in LLMs on Evolving Knowledge (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have explored how LLMs perceive time, but they often overlook the critical aspect of knowledge utilization. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates temporal competence along five key dimensions: Cognition, Awareness, Trustworthiness and reasoning. |
| Outcome: | EvolveBench measures temporal competence along five key dimensions: Cognition, Awareness, Trustworthiness, Understanding and reasoning. |
Do Language Models Have a Common Sense regarding Time? Revisiting Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in the Era of Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Temporal reasoning is a vital component of human communication and understanding, yet remains an underexplored area within the context of Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose to use 3 prompting strategies to evaluate 8 different LLMs across 6 datasets and 2 Code Generation LMs to perform the analysis. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform better on NLP tasks than the standard models on the same dataset. |
LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Mihir Parmar, Nisarg Patel, Neeraj Varshney, Mutsumi Nakamura, Man Luo, Santosh Mashetty, Arindam Mitra, Chitta Baral
| Challenge: | Existing work investigating the logical reasoning ability of large language models has focused only on a couple of inference rules of propositional and first-order logics. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a natural language question-answering dataset to evaluate the logical reasoning ability of large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs poorly on a range of natural language questions using chain-of-thought prompting. |
Benchmarking Temporal Reasoning and Alignment Across Chinese Dynasties (2026.eacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing temporal reasoning benchmarks rely on rule-based construction and lack contextual depth . a recent study found existing LLMs struggle with nuanced temporal understanding . |
| Approach: | a benchmark is designed to evaluate LLMs on temporal reasoning in Chinese dynasties. |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark evaluates LLMs on temporal reasoning across Chinese dynasties . it emphasizes cross-entity relationships, pairwise temporal alignment, contextualized and culturally-grounded reasoning . results show existing LLM benchmarks struggle with nuanced temporal understanding . |
LongBench v2: Towards Deeper Understanding and Reasoning on Realistic Long-context Multitasks (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yushi Bai, Shangqing Tu, Jiajie Zhang, Hao Peng, Xiaozhi Wang, Xin Lv, Shulin Cao, Jiazheng Xu, Lei Hou, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang, Juanzi Li
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks on longcontext large language models fail to reflect their deep understanding capabilities across diverse tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess the ability of long-context large language models to handle long-text problems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 50.1% accuracy when directly answering the questions . human experts achieve only 53.7% accuracy under a 15-minute time constraint . |
LongTableBench: Benchmarking Long-Context Table Reasoning across Real-World Formats and Domains (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Liyao Li, Jiaming Tian, Hao Chen, Wentao Ye, Chao Ye, Haobo Wang, Ningtao Wang, Xing Fu, Gang Chen, Junbo Zhao
| Challenge: | Evaluating 52 LLMs reveals that only the strongest models maintain robust performance under increasing context lengths and format diversity. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for evaluating long-context reasoning over semi-structured tables across diverse formats, tasks, and domains. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms compression-based approaches on tasks requiring semantic integration. |
TIME: Temporally Intelligent Meta-reasoning Engine for Context-Triggered Explicit Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reasoning-oriented language models expose explicit reasoning as a long, front-loaded chain of “thinking” tokens before the main output, either always enabled or externally toggled at inference time. |
| Approach: | They introduce a behavioral alignment framework that learns explicit reasoning as a context-triggered control policy rather than a fixed response mode. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves TIMEBench scores over the base model in thinking and no-thinking modes while keeping output compact. |
Towards Benchmarking and Improving the Temporal Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent time-dependent question answering datasets tend to be biased in either their coverage of time spans or question types. |
| Approach: | They propose a temporal reasoning framework based on temporal span extraction and time-sensitive reinforcement learning to improve the temporal ability of large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the temporal reasoning capability of large language models by using temporal span extraction and time-sensitive reinforcement learning. |
MenatQA: A New Dataset for Testing the Temporal Comprehension and Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have shown nearly saturated performance on many NLP tasks. |
| Approach: | They construct multiple sensitive factors time QA which encompasses three temporal factors . they test current mainstream LLMs with different parameter sizes . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model incorporates three temporal factors with 2,853 samples . the results show that LLMs fall behind smaller models on these factors . |