SpeakerSleuth: Can Large Audio-Language Models Judge Speaker Consistency across Multi-turn Dialogues? (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) are a popular approach for evaluating speech quality, yet their ability to assess speaker consistency across multi-turn dialogues remains unexplored. |
| Approach: | They construct 1,818 human-verified evaluation instances across four datasets spanning synthetic and real speech, with controlled acoustic difficulty. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better in comparing and ranking acoustic variants, demonstrating inherent acustic discrimination capabilities. |
Similar Papers
Towards Holistic Evaluation of Large Audio-Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large audio-language models (LALMs) have expanded their impact beyond natural language processing (NLP) to multimodal domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a systematic taxonomy for LALM evaluations, categorizing them into four dimensions based on their objectives: (1) General Auditory Awareness and Processing, (2) Knowledge and Reasoning, (3) Dialogue-oriented Ability, and (4) Fairness, Safety, and Trustworthiness. |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy categorizes LALM evaluations into four dimensions based on their objectives and highlights challenges in this field. |
Benchmarking Open-ended Audio Dialogue Understanding for Large Audio-Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have recently unlocked audio dialogue capabilities, enabling direct spoken exchanges with humans. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate LALMs' open-ended audio dialogue ability in 3 general scenarios, 12 skills, 9 multilingual languages, and 4 categories of ambiguity handling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark assesses the open-ended audio dialogue ability for LALMs in 3 general scenarios, 12 skills, 9 multilingual languages, and 4 categories of ambiguity handling. |
When Audio and Text Disagree: Revealing Text Bias in Large Audio-Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) are augmented with the ability to perceive audio, but their reliability when faced with conflicting inputs remains largely unexplored. |
| Approach: | They examine how LALMs prioritize information when presented with inconsistent audio-text pairs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models display a significant bias toward textual input when presented with inconsistent audio-text pairs. |
Towards Reliable Large Audio Language Model (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Ziyang Ma, Xiquan Li, Yakun Song, Wenxi Chen, Chenpeng Du, Jian Wu, Yuanzhe Chen, Zhuo Chen, Yuping Wang, Yuxuan Wang, Xie Chen
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large audio language models (LALMs) have demonstrated impressive results and promising prospects in universal understanding and reasoning across speech, music, and general sound. |
| Approach: | They propose to use training-free and training-based methods to enhance LALM reliability to different extents. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve the reliability of large audio language models to different extents. |
How Hypocritical Is Your LLM judge? Listener-Speaker Asymmetries in the Pragmatic Competence of Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly studied as repositories of linguistic knowledge. |
| Approach: | They compare LLMs’ performance as pragmatic listeners and as pragmatic speakers . they find a robust asymmetry between pragmatic evaluation and pragmatic generation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform better as listeners than speakers, and produce more appropriate language than speakers. |
MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ge Bai, Jie Liu, Xingyuan Bu, Yancheng He, Jiaheng Liu, Zhanhui Zhou, Zhuoran Lin, Wenbo Su, Tiezheng Ge, Bo Zheng, Wanli Ouyang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced dialogue systems, but evaluation of their capabilities remains a challenge. |
| Approach: | They propose a model to evaluate the fine-grained abilities of Large Language Models in multi-turn dialogues. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model evaluates 21 popular chatbots based on MT-Bench-101 . it includes 3 overarching abilities and 13 distinct tasks within multi-turn dialogue scenarios. |
Speaker Verification in Agent-generated Conversations (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have increased the capabilities of conversational AI to solve challenging dialogue problems. |
| Approach: | They propose a task to verify whether two sets of utterances originate from the same speaker. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task aims to verify whether two sets of utterances originate from the same speaker. |
How Reliable is Multilingual LLM-as-a-Judge? (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | LLMs are a popular evaluation strategy, but their reliability in multilingual evaluation remains uncertain. |
| Approach: | They evaluate five models from different model families across five diverse tasks involving 25 languages. |
| Outcome: | The models perform poorly across languages and average Fleiss’ Kappa is 0.3 . |
BotChat: Evaluating LLMs’ Capabilities of Having Multi-Turn Dialogues (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Haodong Duan, Jueqi Wei, Chonghua Wang, Hongwei Liu, Yixiao Fang, Songyang Zhang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen
| Challenge: | Modern Large Language Models (LLMs) facilitate high-quality, multi-turn dialogues with humans, but human-based evaluation of such a capability requires substantial manual effort. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate LLMs' ability to emulate human-like, multi-turn conversations using an LLM-centric approach. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model emulates human-like, multi-turn conversations using an LLM-centric approach. |
Simple Agents, Biased Judges: Efficient Multi-Party Dialogue Generation & The Evaluation Gap (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multiparty social dialogue is difficult to formalize and expensive to evaluate, especially at scale. |
| Approach: | They propose a lightweight and controllable multi-party dialoguegeneration framework as an experimental instrument for studying generation and evaluation in social interaction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework shows that human judgments against state-of-the-art LLM judges are consistent with human preferences for naturalness, engagingness, and overall quality in multi-party social dialogue. |