When LLMs Read Tables Carelessly: Measuring and Reducing Data Referencing Errors (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yuqing Yang, Qi Zhu, Zhen Han, Boran Han, Zhengyuan Shen, Shuai Wang, Vassilis N. Ioannidis, Huzefa Rangwala
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) perform well on table tasks, but they still make data referencing errors (DREs) prior studies have only offered limited, small-scale analyses. |
| Approach: | They propose inference-time strategies and lightweight critics to mitigate data referencing errors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves an average F1 score of 78.2% in detecting both in-distribution and out-of-difference DREs and assists inference for larger models. |
Similar Papers
Lost in the Source Language: How Large Language Models Evaluate the Quality of Machine Translation (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) can be used as translation evaluators. |
| Approach: | They propose to use both coarse-grained and fine-grounded prompts to discern the utility of source versus reference data in machine translation evaluation tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to evaluate translations in multiple languages. |
Beyond Performance: Quantifying and Mitigating Label Bias in LLMs (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models exhibit undesirable preference toward predicting certain answers over others, despite their adaptability to diverse tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a label bias calibration method that outperforms recent calibration approaches for improving performance and mitigating label bias. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms calibration approaches for improving performance and mitigating label bias. |
Are LLMs Better than Reported? Detecting Label Errors and Mitigating Their Effect on Model Performance (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities to enhance the annotation process, particularly for detecting label errors in existing datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose to use an ensemble of large language models to flag mislabeled examples by using an LLM-as-a-judge approach to detect label errors in existing datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves label accuracy and consistency in large language models. |
TableLLM: Enabling Tabular Data Manipulation by LLMs in Real Office Usage Scenarios (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xiaokang Zhang, Sijia Luo, Bohan Zhang, Zeyao Ma, Jing Zhang, Yang Li, Guanlin Li, Zijun Yao, Kangli Xu, Jinchang Zhou, Daniel Zhang-Li, Jifan Yu, Shu Zhao, Juanzi Li, Jie Tang
| Challenge: | TableLLM is a robust large language model capable of handling tabular data manipulation tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a distant supervision method for training which includes a reasoning process extension strategy and a cross-way validation strategy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model has 8 billion parameters and is capable of handling tabular data tasks. |
Rethinking Tabular Data Understanding with Large Language Models (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of various tasks, yet their capability in interpreting and reasoning over tabular data remains an underexplored area. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for table structure normalization to improve model performance . they propose aggregation of multiple reasoning pathways to improve performance based on textual and symbolic reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves performance on symbolic reasoning tasks with textual reasoning slightly outperforming symbolic reasoning on tables. |
Automatic Evaluation of Attribution by Large Language Models (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Generative large language models (LLMs) incorporate external references to generate and support claims. however, evaluating the attribution remains an open problem. |
| Approach: | They investigate automatic evaluation of attribution given by large language models . they define different types of attributed errors and then explore two approaches . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods highlight promising signals and challenges. |
What Really Matters for Table LLMs? A Meta-Evaluation of Model and Data Effects (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
Naihao Deng, Sheng Zhang, Henghui Zhu, Shuaichen Chang, Jiani Zhang, Alexander Hanbo Li, Chung-Wei Hang, Hideo Kobayashi, Yiqun Hu, Patrick Ng
| Challenge: | a series of paradigm shifts have come with distinct characteristics and challenges associated with table modeling. |
| Approach: | They propose to replicate four table LLMs by instruction-tuning three foundation models on four existing datasets. |
| Outcome: | The results show that base model choice plays a more dominant role than training data itself. |
What Did I Do Wrong? Quantifying LLMs’ Sensitivity and Consistency to Prompt Engineering (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly improved productivity in a number of routine tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose two metrics for classification tasks, namely *sensitivity* and *consistency*, which are complementary to task performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metrics are complementary to task performance and can be used to guide prompt engineering and obtain LLMs that balance robustness and performance. |
Aligning What LLMs Do and Say: Towards Self-Consistent Explanations (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are often prompted to produce natural language explanations, but the features driving the answer are often different from those emphasized in their explanations. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale benchmark linking model decisions with diverse explanations and attribution vectors across datasets, methods, and model families to address this gap. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model generates an answer where the word NLP in the prompt has high feature importance. |
Confronting LLMs with Traditional ML: Rethinking the Fairness of Large Language Models in Tabular Classifications (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies suggest using large language models to make tabular classifications . however, LLMs have been shown to exhibit harmful social biases based on stereotypes and inequalities present in society. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to make tabular classifications . they show that LLMs inherit biases from their training data . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models exhibit harmful biases that reflect stereotypes and inequalities in society. |