Revisiting the Reliability of Language Models in Instruction-Following (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Several benchmarks have been proposed to measure instruction-following accuracy, but these scores do not translate to reliable services in real-world use. |
| Approach: | They propose a new metric reliable@k and develop an automated pipeline to generate cousin prompts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be instantiated with cousin prompts and generates high-quality cousin prompt data. |
Similar Papers
ReliableEval: A Recipe for Stochastic LLM Evaluation via Method of Moments (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | LLMs are highly sensitive to prompt phrasing, yet standard benchmarks typically report performance using a single prompt, raising concerns about the reliability of such evaluations. |
| Approach: | They propose a stochastic method of moments evaluation over the space of meaning-preserving prompt perturbations and propose resamplings to estimate the number of prompt re-sampleds needed to obtain meaningful results. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is model-, task-, and metric-agnostic, offering a recipe for meaningful and robust evaluation. |
Evaluating the Instruction-Following Robustness of Large Language Models to Prompt Injection (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional proficiency in instruction-following, making them increasingly integral to various applications. |
| Approach: | They establish a benchmark to evaluate the robustness of instruction-following LLMs against prompt injection attacks, assessing their ability to discern which instructions to follow and which to disregard. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is overly sensitive to prompt injection attacks, focusing on the latter part of the prompt without fully understanding the context. |
RCScore: Quantifying Response Consistency in Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current evaluations of large language models rely on a single instruction template, overlooking models’ sensitivity to instruction style. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-dimensional framework quantifying how instruction formulation affects model responses by transforming benchmark problems into multiple instruction styles. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reveals that instruction style can shift accuracy by 16.7% points. |
MetaFaith: Faithful Natural Language Uncertainty Expression in LLMs (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for faithful calibration of large language models (LLMs) are insufficient and can harm faithful calibration. |
| Approach: | They propose a new prompt-based calibration approach inspired by human metacognition that measures faithfulness across diverse models and task domains and enables up to 61% improvement in faithfulness. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves faithfulness across diverse models and task domains and achieves an 83% win rate over original generations as judged by humans. |
What Did I Do Wrong? Quantifying LLMs’ Sensitivity and Consistency to Prompt Engineering (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly improved productivity in a number of routine tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose two metrics for classification tasks, namely *sensitivity* and *consistency*, which are complementary to task performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metrics are complementary to task performance and can be used to guide prompt engineering and obtain LLMs that balance robustness and performance. |
RoCoIns: Enhancing Robustness of Large Language Models through Code-Style Instructions (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in following human instructions and solving NLU tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use code style instructions to replace typically natural language instructions to provide more precise instructions and strengthen the robustness of LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms natural language models on eight robustness datasets and achieves an improvement of 5.68% in test set accuracy and a reduction of 5.66 points in Attack Success Rate (ASR). |
When Punctuation Matters: A Large-Scale Comparison of Prompt Robustness Methods for LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are sensitive to subtle, non-semantic variations in prompt phrasing and formatting. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate 4 methods for improving prompt robustness within a unified experimental framework. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are compared to 8 models from Llama, Qwen and Gemma families and are generalized against multiple types of distribution shifts. |
Quantifying and Improving the Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Against Spurious Features in Grounding Data (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Shiping Yang, Jie Wu, Wenbiao Ding, Ning Wu, Shining Liang, Ming Gong, Hongzhi Li, Hengyuan Zhang, Angel X. Chang, Dongmei Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing studies on robustness to explicit noise (e.g., document semantics) but overlook implicit noise (spurious features). |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to quantify the robustness of RAGs against spurious features by integrating a data synthesis pipeline and a taxonomy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework quantifies the robustness of RALMs against spurious features. |
How Trustworthy are Open-Source LLMs? An Assessment under Malicious Demonstrations Shows their Vulnerabilities (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Rapid progress in open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) is driving AI development, but lacks sufficient trustworthiness to detect and mitigate adversarial demonstrations. |
| Approach: | They propose an extended Chain of Utterances-based (CoU) prompting strategy to attack open-source LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed attack strategy is based on malicious demonstrations and toxicity tests on open-source models. |
Empowering Reliable Visual-Centric Instruction Following in MLLMs (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for evaluating instruction-following capabilities focus on verbal instructions in the textual modality. |
| Approach: | They propose to incorporate vision-dependent constraints into instruction design to enable a more rigorous assessment of how well MLLMs align their outputs with both visual input and textual instructions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark incorporates vision-dependent constraints into instruction design, enabling a more rigorous and fine-grained assessment of how well MLLMs align their outputs with both visual input and textual instructions. |