Challenge: Multi-turn dialogues pose a greater risk than single prompts, but existing safety benchmarks do not account for this situation.
Approach: They propose a benchmark that features dialogues of varying lengths generated from harmful queries accompanied by images.
Outcome: The proposed model reduces multi-turn Attack Success Rate (ASR) compared to existing guard models.

Similar Papers

MTMCS-Bench: Evaluating Contextual Safety of Multimodal Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing contextual safety benchmarks are mostly single-turn and miss how malicious intent can emerge gradually or how the same scene can support both benign and exploitative goals.
Approach: They propose a benchmark that evaluates contextual safety in multimodal large language models . they observe persistent trade-offs between contextual safety and utility .
Outcome: The proposed model combines multi-turn and multi-switch scenarios to evaluate safety in multimodal large language models.
SafeSteer: A Decoding-level Defense Mechanism for Multimodal Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing defense methods rely on fine-tuning or inefficient post-hoc interventions, limiting their ability to address novel attacks.
Approach: They propose a decoding-level defense mechanism that employs a lightweight discriminator to iteratively steer the decoding process toward safety.
Outcome: The proposed method improves safety performance by up to 33.40% without fine-tuning on multiple MLLMs.
Jailbreaking Multimodal Large Language Models using Multi-Clip Video (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies show that video inputs can bypass safety alignment, yet it remains unclear which properties of video input induce this vulnerability.
Approach: They propose a simple image-based defense that mitigates the vulnerability of MLLMs by analyzing video inputs.
Outcome: The proposed defense leverages the relative robustness of the image modality.
When Helpers Become Hazards: A Benchmark for Analyzing Multimodal LLM-Powered Safety in Daily Life (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Safety impact of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on human behavior is evaluated in this study.
Approach: They propose a safety-warning-based evaluation framework that encourages models to provide clear and informative safety warnings, rather than generic refusals.
Outcome: The proposed safety-warning-based evaluation framework encourages models to provide clear and informative safety warnings, rather than generic refusals.
The Side Effects of Being Smart: Safety Risks in MLLMs’ Multi-Image Reasoning (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in multimodal reasoning may pose new safety risks . evaluators neglect reasoningbased safety, where harm emerges only through MLLMs .
Approach: They introduce a benchmark for multi-image reasoning safety that includes 2,676 instances . they find that models with more advanced multi- image reasoning are more vulnerable .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark consists of 2,676 instances covering 9 multi-image relations . the results show that models with more advanced multi- image reasoning are more vulnerable .
USB: A COMPREHENSIVE AND UNIFIED SAFETY EVALUATION BENCHMARK FOR MULTIMODAL LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing safety benchmarks fail to provide reliable assessments due to limited risk coverage, insufficient scale and the oversight of complex modality combinations.
Approach: They propose a framework that covers 61 risk categories across four modality interactions to address this gap.
Outcome: The proposed framework covers 61 risk categories across four distinct modality interactions.
CoSafe: Evaluating Large Language Model Safety in Multi-Turn Dialogue Coreference (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies have not noticed the safety risks of large language models . authors evaluated 1,400 questions in multi-turn dialogue coreference .
Approach: They are the first to evaluate LLM safety in multi-turn dialogue coreference . they created a dataset of 1,400 questions and tested five open-source models .
Outcome: The study shows that model safety decreases in multi-turn dialogue coreference scenarios . the highest success rate was with the LLaMA2-Chat-7b model, while the lowest was with mistral-7B-Instruct model .
SURE: Safety Understanding and Reasoning Enhancement for Multimodal Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing multimodal large language models incorporate visual and textual information, but introduces new and complex safety risks.
Approach: They propose a safety reasoning framework that integrates visual modalities into multimodal models to help them resist jailbreak attacks.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves model safety while avoiding over-defense . it is based on a large-scale safety reasoning dataset .
Can’t See the Forest for the Trees: Benchmarking Multimodal Safety Awareness for Multimodal LLMs (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have expanded the capabilities of traditional language models by enabling interaction through both text and images.
Approach: They propose a multimodal safety awareness benchmark to evaluate MLLMs across 29 safety scenarios with 1,500 carefully curated image-prompt pairs.
Outcome: The proposed model is able to identify unsafe content and avoid over-sensitivity that can hinder helpfulness.
Think in Safety: Unveiling and Mitigating Safety Alignment Collapse in Multimodal Large Reasoning Model (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing Large Reasoning Models have demonstrated broad application potential, yet their safety and reliability remain critical concerns.
Approach: They conduct a safety evaluation of 13 MLRMs across 5 benchmarks and examine their safety performance.
Outcome: The proposed model improves safety on jailbreak and safety-awareness benchmarks.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations