"Excuse me, may I say something..." CoLabScience, A Proactive AI Assistant for Biomedical Discovery and LLM-Expert Collaborations (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing large language models (LLMs) are reactive and respond only when prompted, limiting their effectiveness in collaborative settings. |
| Approach: | They introduce a proactive LLM assistant designed to enhance biomedical collaboration between AI systems and human experts through timely, context-aware interventions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baselines in intervention precision and collaborative task utility, highlighting the potential of proactive LLMs as intelligent scientific assistants. |
Similar Papers
Prompting and Evaluating Large Language Models for Proactive Dialogues: Clarification, Target-guided, and Non-collaboration (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that ChatGPT has limitations such as failing to ask clarifying questions to ambiguous queries or refusing problematic user requests. |
| Approach: | They propose a Proactive Chain-of-Thought prompting scheme which augments LLMs with the goal planning capability over descriptive reasoning chains to trigger proactivity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed scheme augments LLMs with the goal planning capability over descriptive reasoning chains to trigger the proactivity of LLM-based proactive dialogue systems. |
Streamlining Biomedical Research with Specialized LLMs (2025.coling-demos)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using large language models, we can generate accurate, context-aware responses with minimal prompts. |
| Approach: | They propose a system that integrates domain-specific large language models with advanced information retrieval techniques to deliver comprehensive and context-aware responses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system improves quality of dialogue generation and improves efficiency in the biomedical and pharmaceutical domains. |
ProactiveEval: A Unified Evaluation Framework for Proactive Dialogue Agents (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on proactive dialogue models focus on domain-specific or task-oriented scenarios, which leads to fragmented evaluations and limits the comprehensive exploration of models’ proactive dialogue abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for evaluating proactive dialogue capabilities of large language models that decomposes proactive dialogue into target planning and dialogue guidance, establishing evaluation metrics across various domains. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework decomposes proactive dialogue into target planning and dialogue guidance, establishing evaluation metrics across various domains, and enables automatic generation of diverse and challenging evaluation data. |
An LLM-based Knowledge Synthesis and Scientific Reasoning Framework for Biomedical Discovery (2024.acl-demos)
Copied to clipboard
Oskar Wysocki, Magdalena.wysocka@cruk.manchester.ac.uk Magdalena.wysocka@cruk.manchester.ac.uk, Danilo Carvalho, Alex Bogatu, Danilo.miranda@idiap.ch Danilo.miranda@idiap.ch, Maxime.delmas@idiap.ch Maxime.delmas@idiap.ch, Harriet.unsworth@cruk.manchester.ac.uk Harriet.unsworth@cruk.manchester.ac.uk, Andre Freitas
| Challenge: | BioLunar integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) to facilitate scientific reasoning across distributed evidence spaces. |
| Approach: | They present a tool for supporting biological analyses using Large Language Models (LLMs) it integrates large language models to facilitate scientific reasoning across distributed evidence spaces . |
| Outcome: | The proposed tool exemplifies the potential of the integration between LLMs, specialised databases and biomedical tools to support expert-level knowledge synthesis and discovery. |
Reasoning While Asking: Transforming Reasoning Large Language Models from Passive Solvers to Proactive Inquirers (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing reasoning-oriented LLMs lack a blind self-thinking paradigm . current models fail to recognize when their reasoning is underinformed or based on ambiguous user instructions . |
| Approach: | They propose a new reasoning paradigm that transforms LLMs into proactive inquirers that interleave reasoning with clarification. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models on mathematical reasoning, code generation, and document editing. |
YESciEval: Robust LLM-as-a-Judge for Scientific Question Answering (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) drive scientific question-answering on search engines, yet their evaluation robustness remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose an open-source framework that combines rubric-based assessment with reinforcement learning to mitigate optimism bias in LLM evaluators. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework combines fine-grained rubric-based assessment with reinforcement learning to mitigate optimism bias in LLM evaluators. |
InstructMol: Multi-Modal Integration for Building a Versatile and Reliable Molecular Assistant in Drug Discovery (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) can attain professional-level proficiency in specific domains through fine-tuning. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-modal LLM that aligns molecular structures with natural language via an instruction-tuning approach. |
| Outcome: | InstructMol surpasses existing models and reduces the gap with specialists in drug discovery tasks. |
From Automation to Autonomy: A Survey on Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are catalyzing a paradigm shift in scientific discovery, evolving from task-specific automation tools into increasingly autonomous agents. |
| Approach: | They introduce a foundational three-level taxonomy to delineate their escalating autonomy and evolving responsibilities within the research lifecycle. |
| Outcome: | The proposed frameworks provide a conceptual architecture and strategic foresight to navigate and shape the future of AI-driven scientific discovery. |
AssistedDS: Benchmarking How External Domain Knowledge Assists LLMs in Automated Data Science (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
An Luo, Xun Xian, Jin Du, Fangqiao Tian, Ganghua Wang, Ming Zhong, Shengchun Zhao, Xuan Bi, Zirui Liu, Jiawei Zhou, Jayanth Srinivasa, Ashish Kundu, Charles Fleming, Mingyi Hong, Jie Ding
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have advanced the automation of data science workflows, yet it remains unclear whether they can critically leverage external domain knowledge as human data scientists do in practice. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate how large language models handle external domain knowledge in tabular prediction tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model evaluates whether it can critically leverage external domain knowledge as human data scientists do in practice. |
Exploring Multi-Modal Data with Tool-Augmented LLM Agents for Precise Causal Discovery (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing statistical causal discovery methods rely on observational data and often overlook the semantic cues inherent in cause-and-effect relationships. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-agent system powered by tool-augmented Large Language Models that can combine data from multiple modalities and integrate multi-modal data for knowledge-driven reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system has two agents: a Data Augmentation agent that retrieves and processes modality-augmented data, and a Causal Constraint agent that integrates multi-modal data for knowledge-driven reasoning. |