Shuttle Between Symbolic Instructions and Neural Parameters of Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite their distinct external representations, a deeper analysis reveals their intrinsic nature: instructions serve as a natural language compression devised by humans for data governing specific mapping patterns, whereas parameters act as 'neuro compression' of the same task data. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural network framework to model and learn the bi-directional mappings between instructions and parameters of large language models by evaluating it on the tasks of instruction deduction and induction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can map one of the instructions/parameters to the other by evaluating it on the tasks of instruction deduction and induction. |
Similar Papers
CodecLM: Aligning Language Models with Tailored Synthetic Data (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Zifeng Wang, Chun-Liang Li, Vincent Perot, Long Le, Jin Miao, Zizhao Zhang, Chen-Yu Lee, Tomas Pfister
| Challenge: | Recent work on generating diverse instructions and applying LLM to increase instruction complexity neglects downstream use cases. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for generating high-quality synthetic data for LLM alignment with different downstream instruction distributions and LLMs. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on four open-domain instruction using the proposed framework validate the effectiveness of CodecLM over the current state-of-the-art. |
From Complex to Simple: Enhancing Multi-Constraint Complex Instruction Following Ability of Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) follow instructions with elaborate requirements, yet it remains under-explored how to enhance their ability to follow complex instructions with multiple constraints. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to obtain and utilize effective training data to enhance LLMs' ability to follow complex instructions with multiple constraints. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves models' ability to follow instructions generally and generalize effectively across out-of-domain, in domain, and adversarial settings while maintaining general capabilities. |
From Language Modeling to Instruction Following: Understanding the Behavior Shift in LLMs after Instruction Tuning (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in aligning with user intentions. |
| Approach: | They develop local and global explanation methods and a feed-forward-based method for input-output attribution to investigate the impact of instruction tuning on user intentions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method compares explanations from pre-trained and instruction-tuned models . it empowers LLMs to recognize the instruction parts of user prompts, it encourages response generation . |
Layer by Layer: Uncovering Where Multi-Task Learning Happens in Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained large language models retain task-specific knowledge, but where and to what extent they retain it remains unexplored. |
| Approach: | They investigate the task-specific information encoded in pre-trained LLMs and the effects of instruction tuning on their representations across over 60 NLP tasks. |
| Outcome: | The results show that pre-trained models retain task-specific knowledge . some tasks are already encoded in pre-train models, but others benefit from instruction tuning. |
Demystifying Instruction Mixing for Fine-tuning Large Language Models (2024.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Instruction tuning is effective for aligning large language models with human instructions, but the procedure to optimizing the mixing of instruction datasets is still unclear. |
| Approach: | They categorize instructions into three primary types: NLP downstream tasks, coding, and general chat. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves performance of large language models (LLMs) but it is difficult to combine different instruction datasets to optimize overall performance. |
Advancing Language Models through Instruction Tuning: Recent Progress and Challenges (2025.emnlp-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | tutorial addresses three critical questions within the field of instruction tuning: (1) What are the current focal points in instruction tuning research? (2) What are best practices in training an instruction-following model? (3) What new challenges have emerged? |
| Approach: | This tutorial presents a systematic overview of recent advances in instruction tuning. |
| Outcome: | The tutorial covers different stages in model training: supervised fine-tuning, preference optimization, and reinforcement learning. |
Formality is Favored: Unraveling the Learning Preferences of Large Language Models on Data with Conflicting Knowledge (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models have shown excellent performance on knowledge-intensive tasks, but pretraining data tends to contain misleading and conflicting information. |
| Approach: | They systematically analyze LLMs’ learning preferences for data with conflicting knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms human-level models on knowledge-intensive tasks by analyzing pretraining data. |
On Relation-Specific Neurons in Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yihong Liu, Runsheng Chen, Lea Hirlimann, Ahmad Dawar Hakimi, Mingyang Wang, Amir Hossein Kargaran, Sascha Rothe, François Yvon, Hinrich Schuetze
| Challenge: | In large language models, certain neurons can store distinct pieces of knowledge learned during pretraining. |
| Approach: | They hypothesize that relation-specific neurons detect relation in input text and guide generation involving such a relation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can handle facts involving relation r and facts containing a different relation . |
SFTMix: Elevating Language Model Instruction Tuning with Mixup Recipe (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Efforts to improve instruction tuning often focus on higher-quality supervised fine-tuning datasets, typically requiring data filtering with proprietary LLMs or human annotation. |
| Approach: | They propose a Mixup-based recipe that elevates LLM instruction tuning without relying on well-curated datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves instruction-following and healthcare-specific tasks with consistent improvements across LLM families and SFT datasets. |
Beyond Neural Incompatibility: Cross-Scale Knowledge Transfer in Large Language Models through Latent Semantic Alignment (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods that reuse layer parameters are limited by incompatibility . a central challenge is to make cross-scale knowledge transfer effective and efficient . |
| Approach: | They propose a method that uses latent semantic alignment to facilitate cross-scale knowledge transfer . they use activations to pair target and source layers in latent space to achieve alignment . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is effective when source and target models differ in architecture and parameterization. |