| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on English, leaving substantial gaps in assessing LLM capabilities in low-resource and linguistically diverse languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-task indic language understanding benchmark to assess LLMs in low-resource languages. |
| Outcome: | The new benchmark spans 8 domains and 41 subjects across 11 Indic languages, reflecting general and culturally specific knowledge. |
Similar Papers
INDIC QA BENCHMARK: A Multilingual Benchmark to Evaluate Question Answering capability of LLMs for Indic Languages (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Abhishek Kumar Singh, Vishwajeet Kumar, Rudra Murthy, Jaydeep Sen, Ashish Mittal, Ganesh Ramakrishnan
| Challenge: | Large Language Models perform well on unseen tasks in English, but their abilities in non-English languages are less explored due to limited benchmarks and training data. |
| Approach: | They propose to release a large dataset for context-grounded question answering in 11 major Indian languages. |
| Outcome: | The Indic-QA Benchmark compared large datasets of large LLMs on extractive and abstractive tasks in 11 major Indian languages. |
MiLiC-Eval: Benchmarking Multilingual LLMs for China’s Minority Languages (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models excel in high-resource languages but struggle with low-resourced languages . minority languages such as Tibetan, Uyghur, Kazakh, and Mongolian are marginalized in NLP research due to limited digital representation and the scarcity of training data. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for minority languages in China that tracks the progress of large language models on low-resource languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark focuses on underrepresented writing systems and syntax-intensive tasks. |
IndicGenBench: A Multilingual Benchmark to Evaluate Generation Capabilities of LLMs on Indic Languages (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | IndicGenBench is the largest benchmark for evaluating large language models on user-facing generation tasks across a diverse set of 29 Indic languages . |
| Approach: | They evaluate large language models on user-facing generation tasks across 29 languages . they use human curation to provide multi-way parallel evaluation data for many under-represented languages a github repository . |
| Outcome: | IndicGenBench is the largest benchmark for evaluating LLMs on user-facing generation tasks across a diverse set of 29 Indic languages covering 13 scripts and 4 language families. |
IndicNLPSuite: Monolingual Corpora, Evaluation Benchmarks and Pre-trained Multilingual Language Models for Indian Languages (2020.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Divyanshu Kakwani, Anoop Kunchukuttan, Satish Golla, Gokul N.C., Avik Bhattacharyya, Mitesh M. Khapra, Pratyush Kumar
| Challenge: | In this paper, we present NLP resources for 11 major Indian languages . distributional representations are the cornerstone of modern NLP, authors say . |
| Approach: | They introduce NLP resources for 11 major Indian languages from two major language families . monolingual corpora contains 8.8 billion tokens across all 11 languages and Indian English . they also compile a benchmark for Indian language NLU to evaluate their results . |
| Outcome: | The monolingual corpora contains 8.8 billion tokens across all 11 languages and Indian English . the pre-trained language models are based on the compact ALBERT model . |
Towards Leaving No Indic Language Behind: Building Monolingual Corpora, Benchmark and Models for Indic Languages (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Sumanth Doddapaneni, Rahul Aralikatte, Gowtham Ramesh, Shreya Goyal, Mitesh M. Khapra, Anoop Kunchukuttan, Pratyush Kumar
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Natural Language Understanding are driven by pretrained multilingual models, which can potentially reduce the performance gap between high-resource languages through zero-shot knowledge transfer. |
| Approach: | They propose to create a human-supervised benchmark for Indic languages, IndicXTREME, with nine diverse NLU tasks covering 20 languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on the monolingual corpora, IndicCorp, and IndicBERT in Indic languages with 105 evaluation sets across languages and tasks. |
BenchMAX: A Comprehensive Multilingual Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multilingual benchmarks focus primarily on language understanding tasks. |
| Approach: | They develop a multi-way multilingual benchmark that measures critical capabilities of large language models across languages. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on BenchMAX reveal uneven utilization of core capabilities across languages, emphasizing the performance gaps that scaling model size alone does not resolve. |
Evaluating Large Language Models with Enterprise Benchmarks (2025.naacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Bing Zhang, Mikio Takeuchi, Ryo Kawahara, Shubhi Asthana, Maruf Hossain, Guang-Jie Ren, Kate Soule, Yifan Mai, Yada Zhu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks lack domain-specific datasets for evaluating large language models . existing benchmarks often lack domain specific datasets, which can be difficult to convert to standardized metrics or regulatory issues. |
| Approach: | They propose to use 25 publicly available domain-specific English benchmarks from diverse domains . they propose to combine a wide range of natural language processing tasks for holistic evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework includes 25 publicly available domain-specific English benchmarks from diverse enterprise domains like financial services, legal, climate, cyber security, and 2 public Japanese finance benchmarks. |
PARIKSHA: A Large-Scale Investigation of Human-LLM Evaluator Agreement on Multilingual and Multi-Cultural Data (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Evaluation of multilingual Large Language Models is challenging due to a variety of factors including the lack of benchmarks with sufficient linguistic diversity, contamination of popular benchmarks into LLM pre-training data and lack of local, cultural nuances in translated benchmarks. |
| Approach: | They evaluate 30 models across 10 Indic languages by conducting 90K human evaluations and 30K LLM-based evaluations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform best in most Indic languages, while the agreement drops for direct assessment especially for Bengali and Odia. |
MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Weihao Xuan, Rui Yang, Heli Qi, Qingcheng Zeng, Yunze Xiao, Aosong Feng, Dairui Liu, Yun Xing, Junjue Wang, Fan Gao, Jinghui Lu, Yuang Jiang, Huitao Li, Xin Li, Kunyu Yu, Ruihai Dong, Shangding Gu, Yuekang Li, Xiaofei Xie, Felix Juefei-Xu, Foutse Khomh, Osamu Yoshie, Qingyu Chen, Douglas Teodoro, Nan Liu, Randy Goebel, Lei Ma, Edison Marrese-Taylor, Shijian Lu, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo, Irene Li
| Challenge: | Existing large language model evaluation benchmarks focus on English, while current multilingual tasks lack parallel questions that specifically assess cross-lingual reasoning abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a comprehensive benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark. |
| Outcome: | The MMLU-ProX is a comprehensive benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark. |
SANSKRITI: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models’ Knowledge of Indian Culture (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Language models excel in syntactic and semantic analysis, while small language models struggle in region-specific contexts. |
| Approach: | They evaluate SANSKRITI on leading Large Language Models, Indic Language Model, and Small Language Model (SLM) it covers 16 key attributes of Indian culture including rituals and ceremonies, history, tourism, cuisine, dance and music, costume, language, art, festivals, religion, medicine, transport, sports, nightlife and personalities. |
| Outcome: | The SANSKRITI dataset covers 16 attributes of Indian culture . it reveals that many models struggle in region-specific contexts . |