Challenge: Recent studies also use large language models (LLMs) for query understanding, but these methods lack grounding in corpus-specific knowledge and may generate unreliable or unfaithful content.
Approach: They propose a paper retrieval framework that combines large language models (LLMs) with a concept-based semantic index to capture scientific concepts.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves the performance of various base retrievers, surpasses strong existing LLM-based baselines, and remains highly efficient.

Similar Papers

ResearchBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Scientific Discovery via Inspiration-Based Task Decomposition (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models have shown potential in assisting scientific research, yet their ability to discover high-quality research hypotheses remains unexamined due to the lack of a dedicated benchmark.
Approach: They propose a benchmark for evaluating large language models on a sufficient set of scientific discovery sub-tasks.
Outcome: The proposed framework extracts critical components from papers across 12 disciplines with expert validation confirming its accuracy.
DIVKNOWQA: Assessing the Reasoning Ability of LLMs via Open-Domain Question Answering over Knowledge Base and Text (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Retrievalaugmented LLMs have been used to ground LLM in external knowledge . a gap exists in the current landscape regarding the effectiveness of grounding LLM on heterogeneous knowledge sources.
Approach: They propose a model that uses symbolic language to generate symbolic queries . they use a dataset that is generated using predefined reasoning chains and human annotation .
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms previous approaches by a significant margin in QA tasks over text.
Knowledge Navigator: LLM-guided Browsing Framework for Exploratory Search in Scientific Literature (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Knowledge Navigator organizes retrieved documents into a navigable, two-level hierarchy of named and descriptive topics and subtopics.
Approach: They propose to organize retrieved scientific documents into a navigable, two-level hierarchy of named and descriptive topics and subtopics.
Outcome: The proposed system provides an overall view of the research themes in a domain while also enabling iterative search and deeper knowledge discovery within specific subtopics.
From Isolated Scoring to Collaborative Ranking: A Comparison-Native Framework for LLM-Based Paper Evaluation (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) are currently used to evaluate scientific papers by assigning an absolute score to each paper independently.
Approach: They propose a comparison-native framework for paper evaluation that integrates comparison into both data construction and model learning.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves an average relative improvement of 21.8% over the strong baseline DeepReview-14B, while exhibiting robust generalization to five previously unseen datasets.
Large Language Models for Scientific Information Extraction: An Empirical Study for Virology (2024.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Scholarly communication in the digital age is facing significant challenges due to the overwhelming volume of publications.
Approach: They propose to use Wikipedia infoboxes and structured Amazon product descriptions to create structured scholarly contribution summaries using text generation capabilities of LLMs.
Outcome: The proposed model can be applied to complex IE tasks within terse domains like Science with 1000x fewer parameters than the state-of-the-art GPT-davinci.
GroupRank: A Groupwise Paradigm for Effective and Efficient Passage Reranking with LLMs (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing rankers excel in lexical-matching scenarios, while they struggle with complex queries requiring deep reasoning.
Approach: They propose a new paradigm that balances flexibility and context awareness to unlock the full potential of groupwise reranking.
Outcome: The proposed approach achieves a state-of-the-art 65.2 NDCG@10 on BRIGHT and surpasses baselines by 2.1 points on R2MED while delivering a 6.4 inference speedup.
PAPERMIND: Benchmarking Agentic Reasoning and Critique over Scientific Papers in Multimodal LLMs (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks assess integrated and agent-oriented scientific reasoning in isolation . Existing systems assess integrated reasoning in isolated tasks .
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate integrated and agent-oriented scientific reasoning over research papers.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark evaluates integrated and agent-oriented scientific reasoning over scientific papers.
MrRank: Improving Question Answering Retrieval System through Multi-Result Ranking Model (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing IR techniques contain deficiencies, posing a performance bottleneck . combining diverse approaches to retrieve information is a viable strategy .
Approach: They propose an approach that leverages learning-to-rank techniques to combine heterogeneous IR systems.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms existing methods on two Retrieval Question Answering tasks.
Unsupervised Dense Retrieval for Scientific Articles (2022.emnlp-industry)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing lexical search models suffer from lexica gap problems and are not fast enough to solve these problems.
Approach: They build a dense retrieval based semantic search engine on scientific articles from Elsevier that generates high-quality pseudo training labels.
Outcome: The proposed model significantly outperforms the currently deployed lexical search engine on the two test sets.
DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking Process (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing Large Language Models (LLMs) face limited domain expertise, hallucinated reasoning, and a lack of structured evaluation.
Approach: They propose a multi-stage framework to emulate expert reviewers by incorporating structured analysis, literature retrieval, and evidence-based argumentation.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms CycleReviewer-70B with fewer tokens and achieves 88.21% and 80.20% win rates.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations