How Far are LLMs from Being Our Digital Twins? A Benchmark for Persona-Based Behavior Chain Simulation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have focused on dialogue simulation while overlooking human behavior simulation, which is crucial for digital twins. |
| Approach: | They propose to integrate persona metadata into LLMs and use it to iteratively infer contextually appropriate behaviors within dynamic scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on 15,846 distinct behaviors across 1,001 unique personas and incorporates persona metadata to iteratively infer appropriate behaviors within dynamic scenarios. |
Similar Papers
TwinVoice: A Multi-dimensional Benchmark Towards Digital Twins via LLM Persona Simulation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Bangde Du, Minghao Guo, Songming He, Ziyi Ye, Xi Zhu, Weihang Su, Shuqi Zhu, Yujia Zhou, Yongfeng Zhang, Qingyao Ai, Yiqun Liu
| Challenge: | Existing studies show that advanced LLMs produce text indistinguishable from human writing. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess persona simulation across diverse contexts by decomposing the evaluation into six fundamental capabilities including opinion consistency, memory recall, logical reasoning, persona tone, and syntactic style. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves moderate accuracy but falls short of the basic capabilities needed to simulate personas in real-world contexts. |
PersonaGym: Evaluating Persona Agents and LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Vinay Samuel, Henry Peng Zou, Yue Zhou, Shreyas Chaudhari, Ashwin Kalyan, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Ameet Deshpande, Karthik R Narasimhan, Vishvak Murahari
| Challenge: | Persona agents are LLM agents conditioned to act according to an assigned persona . evaluating how faithfully these agents adhere to their personas remains a challenge . |
| Approach: | a new study evaluates persona agents' ability to act according to an assigned persona . a persona agent's person score is a human-aligned automatic metric that can be used to evaluate a model . |
| Outcome: | a new evaluation framework and a human-aligned automatic metric show that persona agents can perform better. |
Persistent Personas? Role-Playing, Instruction Following, and Safety in Extended Interactions (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Persona-assigned large language models are used in education, healthcare and sociodemographic simulations. |
| Approach: | They propose a protocol that combines long persona dialogues and evaluation datasets to create dialogue-conditioned benchmarks that can robustly measure long-context effects. |
| Outcome: | The proposed protocol can measure persona fidelity, instruction-following, and safety in long conversations. |
Two Tales of Persona in LLMs: A Survey of Role-Playing and Personalization (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing literature on leveraging persona in large language models is disorganized and lacks a systematic taxonomy . leveraging peopleas has resurfaced as an ideal lens for adapting LLMs for specific contexts . |
| Approach: | They propose to categorize current research on leveraging persona in large language models . they propose to use a comprehensive survey to categorize existing studies . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework is a promising framework for tailoring large language models to specific contexts. |
OPeRA: A Dataset of Observation, Persona, Rationale, and Action for Evaluating LLMs on Human Online Shopping Behavior Simulation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ziyi Wang, Yuxuan Lu, Wenbo Li, Amirali Amini, Bo Sun, Yakov Bart, Weimin Lyu, Jiri Gesi, Tian Wang, Jing Huang, Yu Su, Upol Ehsan, Malihe Alikhani, Toby Jia-Jun Li, Lydia Chilton, Dakuo Wang
| Challenge: | evaluating LLMs' ability to mimic real user behavior remains an open challenge due to the lack of high-quality, publicly available datasets that capture both the observable actions and the internal reasoning of an actual user. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset of Observation, Persona, Rationale, and Action collected from real human participants during online shopping sessions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset is the first to evaluate how well current LLMs can accurately simulate the next web action of a specific user. |
Modeling, Evaluating, and Embodying Personality in LLMs: A Survey (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Iago Alves Brito, Julia Soares Dollis, Fernanda Bufon Färber, Pedro Schindler Freire Brasil Ribeiro, Rafael Teixeira Sousa, Arlindo Rodrigues Galvão Filho
| Challenge: | This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the LLM-driven personality scenario. |
| Approach: | This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the LLM-driven personality scenario. |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy analyzes the limitations of existing methods and identifies key research gaps. |
If an LLM Were a Character, Would It Know Its Own Story? Evaluating Lifelong Learning in LLMs (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Siqi Fan, Xiusheng Huang, Yiqun Yao, Xuezhi Fang, Kang Liu, Peng Han, Shuo Shang, Aixin Sun, Yequan Wang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) fail to capture these dynamics, focusing on static, open-ended evaluations. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess lifelong learning in large language models . they use two episodic datasets rich in narrative structure and character interactions . |
| Outcome: | Experiments on LLMs show that non-parametric methods outperform parametric ones in managing stateful learning. |
Investigating Human and LLMs’ Decisions in Unverifiable Environments: A Case Study with GitHub Activity Overview (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | examining the behaviors of Large Language Models as artificial social actors is underexplored, especially in unverifiable scenarios where conventional benchmarking has little to help improve their abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to collect, compare, and reason about human and LLMs' decisions in an unverifiable scenario and use it to examine their behaviors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method compared human and LLM decisions in an unverifiable scenario on GitHub and found that proprietary LLMs behave more like humans than open-source LLM systems. |
A User-Centric Multi-Intent Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on specific predefined model abilities, such as world knowledge, reasoning, etc., making it difficult for users to determine which LLM best suits their particular needs. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate large language models from a user-centric perspective and use real-world use cases to identify their effectiveness under distinct intents. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks achieve a correlation between human preference and the user-reported scenarios and human intents. |
FB-Bench: A Fine-Grained Multi-Task Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs’ Responsiveness to Human Feedback (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research focuses on benchmarking LLMs in single-turn dialogues, neglecting the nuanced nature of human feedback within real-world usage scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained, multi-task benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs’ responsiveness to human feedback under real-world usage scenarios in Chinese. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that human feedback can significantly impact LLMs’ responsiveness in real-world usage scenarios. |