Summary Factual Inconsistency Detection Based on LLMs Enhanced by Universal Information Extraction (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that Large language models can detect factual inconsistencies in summaries but they lack the efficiency and explainability needed to be effective. |
| Approach: | They propose to decouple LLMs’ information extraction and reasoning capabilities to address key challenges and propose a framework for UIEFID to guide fine-tuned LLM methods in extracting unified structured information from documents and summaries. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the detection accuracy and reduces redundant reasoning on the AGGREFACT benchmark. |
Similar Papers
Interpretable Automatic Fine-grained Inconsistency Detection in Text Summarization (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing factual consistency evaluation approaches for text summarization provide binary predictions and limited insights into the weakness of summarizing systems. |
| Approach: | They propose a task of fine-grained inconsistency detection to detect inconsistent summaries . they represent facts with semantic frames extracted by semantic role labeling and highlight related semantic frames to predict inconsistance . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models and provides evidence to support or refute the summary. |
SummEdits: Measuring LLM Ability at Factual Reasoning Through The Lens of Summarization (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Philippe Laban, Wojciech Kryscinski, Divyansh Agarwal, Alexander Fabbri, Caiming Xiong, Shafiq Joty, Chien-Sheng Wu
| Challenge: | Existing factual consistency benchmarks are inadequate to detect factual inconsistencies in LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a protocol for inconsistency detection benchmark creation and implement it in a 10-domain benchmark called SummEdits. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is 20 times more cost-effective per sample and highly reproducible, as it estimates inter-annotator agreement at about 0.9. |
SummaCoz: A Dataset for Improving the Interpretability of Factual Consistency Detection for Summarization (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Summarization is an important application of Large Language Models. |
| Approach: | They integrate human-annotated and model-generated natural language explanations to elucidate how a summary deviates and becomes inconsistent with its source article. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model provides rationales for its judgments and improves its accuracy significantly. |
SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarization (2022.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that even state-of-the-art pre-trained language models can generate inconsistent summaries in more than 70% of all cases. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that enables NLI models to be used for inconsistency detection by segmenting documents into sentence units and aggregating scores between pairs of sentences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy of 74.4% on six large inconsistency detection datasets. |
Detecting Errors through Ensembling Prompts (DEEP): An End-to-End LLM Framework for Detecting Factual Errors (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for detecting factual errors in text summarization are inadequate for the task. |
| Approach: | They propose an end-to-end large language model framework for detecting factual errors in text summarization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) balanced accuracy on the AggreFact-XSUM FTSOTA, TofuEval Summary-Level, and HaluEVAL Summarization benchmarks. |
A Unified Model for Extractive and Abstractive Summarization using Inconsistency Loss (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | extractive models can obtain sentence-level attention with high ROUGE scores but less readable. abstractive models generate novel words and phrases not copied from the source text. |
| Approach: | They propose to combine extractive and abstractive models to achieve a unified model that generates readable paragraphs with word-level attention. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art ROUGE scores while being the most informative and readable summarization on the CNN/Daily Mail dataset in a solid human evaluation. |
Discourse-Driven Evaluation: Unveiling Factual Inconsistency in Long Document Summarization (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing summarization systems can generate fluent summaries, but their ability to produce factually consistent summary remains questionable. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that decomposes long texts into discourse-inspired chunks and utilizes discourse information to better aggregate sentence-level scores predicted by NLI models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework shows better performance over multiple benchmarks, focusing on long document summarization. |
Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a weakly-supervised approach is needed to verify factual consistency . auxiliary span extraction tasks are useful for verifying factual consistent summaries . |
| Approach: | They propose a weakly-supervised approach for verifying factual consistency . they transfer the model to summaries generated by several neural models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms models trained with strong supervision on source documents and human evaluations. |
Identifying Factual Inconsistencies in Summaries: Grounding LLM Inference via Task Taxonomy (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have focused on specialized BERT-variants and recent LLMs to reason inconsistencies. |
| Approach: | They propose to incorporate task-specific taxonomy into inferences to facilitate both zero-shot and supervised paradigms. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms specialized non-LLM and recent LLM models in a number of domains. |
Improving Factual Consistency in Abstractive Summarization with Sentence Structure Pruning (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
Dingxin Hu, Xuanyu Zhang, Xingyue Zhang, Yiyang Li, Dongsheng Chen, Marina Litvak, Natalia Vanetik, Qing Yang, Dongliang Xu, Yanquan Zhou, Lei Li, Yuze Li, Yingqi Zhu
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization models suffer from factual inconsistency problem . post-editing methods focus on replacing suspicious entities, failing to modify incorrect content hidden in sentence structures. |
| Approach: | They propose to use sentence pruning operation to correct possible errors . they propose to apply sentence pruning operations to the syntactic dependency tree . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves factual consistency on the FRANK dataset compared with baselines . it is model-independent and can serve as the final step in ensuring factual consistentness. |