Is Large Language Model Performance on Reasoning Tasks Impacted by Different Ways Questions Are Asked? (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on Large Language Models (LLMs) have not investigated the impact of question types on LLM performance. |
| Approach: | They evaluate the performance of five Large Language Models on reasoning tasks . they use quantitative reasoning tasks and deductive reasoning tasks to evaluate the models . |
| Outcome: | The results show that Reasoning accuracy does not correlate with final selection accuracy. |
Similar Papers
Evaluating the Deductive Competence of Large Language Models (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing large language models have limited abilities to solve deductive reasoning problems . performance differences between conditions do not improve overall performance . |
| Approach: | They investigate whether several large language models can solve a deductive reasoning problem in their conventional form. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can solve a classic type of deductive reasoning problem in their conventional form. |
Can Multiple-choice Questions Really Be Useful in Detecting the Abilities of LLMs? (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are widely used in the evaluation of large language models (LLMs) however, there are concerns about whether MCQ can truly measure LLM’s capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multiple choice questions to evaluate large language models (LLMs) to assess their capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods show that MCQs are less reliable than LFGQs in terms of expected calibration error. |
What Factors Influence LLMs’ Judgments? A Case Study on Question Answering (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
Lei Chen, Bobo Li, Li Zheng, Haining Wang, Zixiang Meng, Runfeng Shi, Hao Fei, Jun Zhou, Fei Li, Chong Teng, Donghong Ji
| Challenge: | Existing studies indicate that Large Language Models perform at a level comparable to humans with advantages of speed and cost-effectiveness in different fields. |
| Approach: | They propose to introduce four unexplored factors and a new dimension of question difficulty to provide a more comprehensive understanding of LLMs’ judgments across varying question intricacies. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dimensions of question difficulty and answer quantity provide valuable insights into optimizing LLMs’ performance as judges. |
Do Large Language Models excel in Complex Logical Reasoning with Formal Language? (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on LLMs have focused on formal language, but evaluations of their performance are limited. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a formal language to evaluate LLMs across logical reasoning problems using formal languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms Instruct models in three dimensions, taxonomy of tasks, and format of trajectories, and achieves the best generalization performance across other languages. |
Comparing Inferential Strategies of Humans and Large Language Models in Deductive Reasoning (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in the domain of large language models (LLMs) have showcased their capability in executing deductive reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They examine inferential strategies employed by large language models through a detailed evaluation of their responses to propositional logic problems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model shows that it displays reasoning patterns similar to humans, including strategies like supposition following or chain construction. |
Are Large Language Models Consistent over Value-laden Questions? (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) appear to bias survey answers toward certain values . however, some argue that LLMs are inconsistent to simulate particular values - a recent study . |
| Approach: | They define value consistency as similarity of answers across paraphrases, related questions and multilingual translations of a question to English, Chinese, German, and Japanese. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is consistent across paraphrases, use-cases, translations, and within a topic. |
Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reasoning is a fundamental aspect of human intelligence that plays a crucial role in many intellectual activities. |
| Approach: | They propose to improve LLMs' ability to elicit reasoning by providing exemplars or prompts to model reasoning. |
| Outcome: | This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the state of knowledge on reasoning in large language models. |
Puzzle Solving using Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Survey (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their logical reasoning abilities across various domains. |
| Approach: | They propose to divide puzzles into rule-based and rule-less categories and critically assess LLMs' performance through various methodologies. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models have demonstrated capabilities in deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning, but they face limitations in inductive thinking. |
An Empirical Study of LLM Reasoning Ability Under Strict Output Length Constraint (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yi Sun, Han Wang, Jiaqiang Li, Jiacheng Liu, Xiangyu Li, Hao Wen, Yizhen Yuan, Huiwen Zheng, Yan Liang, Yuanchun Li, Yunxin Liu
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are a powerful tool for test-time scaling, but they are often used under time constraints. |
| Approach: | They propose to use LLMs to make models think before answering questions . they also use self-correction and best-of-N decoding to encourage deeper thinking . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are able to achieve higher inference accuracy with extra inference computation under time constraints. |
Can LLMs Reason Like Doctors? Exploring the Limits of Large Language Models in Complex Medical Reasoning (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable progress in reasoning across multiple domains, but it remains unclear whether their abilities reflect genuine reasoning or sophisticated pattern matching. |
| Approach: | They conduct one of the largest evaluations to date, assessing 77 LLMs . they select three medical question answering (QA) benchmarks targeting reasoning processes . |
| Outcome: | The results highlight the need to improve specific reasoning strategies to better reflect medical decision-making. |