| Challenge: | Large language models are increasingly used as autonomous agents for simulation and decision-making. |
| Approach: | They apply Cumulative Prospect Theory and the Big Five personality framework to investigate the relationship between LLMs’ personality traits and risk-propensity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models show that they are risk-neutral rational agents, whereas others show lower neuroticism and higher conscientiousness and Agreeability traits. |
Similar Papers
Exploring the Choice Behavior of Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being adopted across various domains where they help to make choices. |
| Approach: | They construct a virtual QA platform that includes three different experimental conditions, with four models from GPT and Llama series participating in repeated experiments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model includes three experimental conditions and four models from GPT and Llama series. |
Do LLMs Have Distinct and Consistent Personality? TRAIT: Personality Testset designed for LLMs with Psychometrics (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Seungbeen Lee, Seungwon Lim, Seungju Han, Giyeong Oh, Hyungjoo Chae, Jiwan Chung, Minju Kim, Beong-woo Kwak, Yeonsoo Lee, Dongha Lee, Jinyoung Yeo, Youngjae Yu
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to their adaptation as conversational agents. |
| Approach: | They propose a new benchmark that uses 8K multi-choice questions to assess the personality of Large Language Models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed personality test outperforms existing personality tests for LLMs in reliability and validity. |
PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that LLMs can generate content that aligns with their assigned personality traits, but there is limited research on whether they consistently reflect specific personality traits. |
| Approach: | They propose to study the behavior of LLM-based agents which they refer to as LLM personas and simulate them to measure their personality traits. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on the Big Five personality model and has been validated by human evaluations and automatic evaluations. |
Manipulating the Perceived Personality Traits of Language Models (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Psychology research has long explored aspects of human personality like extroversion, agreeableness and emotional stability, three of the personality traits that make up the ‘Big Five’. |
| Approach: | They propose to use text generated from large language models to evaluate perceived personality traits and to frame them as tools for controlling personas in dialog systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models predict personality traits in different contexts and can be manipulated in a predictable way. |
On the Reliability of Psychological Scales on Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research has focused on examining Large Language Models’ characteristics from a psychological standpoint, acknowledging the necessity of understanding their behavioral characteristics. |
| Approach: | They propose to examine the reliability of personality tests to LLMs by using psychological scales. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can represent diverse personalities with specific prompt instructions. |
Uncovering Strategic Egoism Behaviors in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Extensive experiments on 9 proprietary LLMs reveal that SE behaviors are widespread . study identifies egoistic decision-making as a risk for large language models . |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to measure egoistic behavior in large language models . they propose toxicity, jailbreak vulnerability and a lightweight mitigation that reinforces situational constraints . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model has a 67.96% occurrence rate and frequently manifests as manipulative coercion. |
Will LLMs Sink or Swim? Exploring Decision-Making Under Pressure (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown their ability to simulate human-like decision-making, yet the impact of psychological pressures on their decision- making processes remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They used explicit and implicit pressure prompts to induce specific pressures and tested them on reasoning, psychometric, and game theory tasks. |
| Outcome: | The results show that pressures significantly affect LLMs’ decision-making, varying across tasks and models. |
Can LLM Agents Maintain a Persona in Discourse? (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Pranav Bhandari, Nicolas Fay, Michael J Wise, Amitava Datta, Stephanie Meek, Usman Naseem, Mehwish Nasim
| Challenge: | Large language models are often subjected to context-shifting behaviour, resulting in a lack of consistent and interpretable personality-aligned interactions. |
| Approach: | They propose to use two conversation agents to generate a discourse with an assigned personality from the OCEAN framework and then use multiple judge agents to infer original traits. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on two conversation agents with a personality assigned from the OCEAN framework and then multiple judge agents to infer the original traits assigned. |
Exploring the Impact of Personality Traits on LLM Toxicity and Bias (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | anthropomorphic LLMs are being developed to serve diversified roles, but content safety concerns remain regarding their toxicity and toxicity. |
| Approach: | They propose to assign personality traits to large language models (LLMs) to reduce toxic language and social biases in their outputs by using the widely accepted HEXACO personality framework developed in social psychology. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is able to perform on three toxic and bias benchmarks and shows that assigning personality traits reduces bias and toxicity similar to humans’ correlations between personality traits and toxic behaviors. |
How Personality Traits Influence Negotiation Outcomes? A Simulation based on Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Psychological evidence reveals the influence of personality traits on decision-making. |
| Approach: | They propose a simulation framework centered on large language model agents with synthesized personality traits and propose empirical insights into the strategic impacts of Big Five personality traits on outcomes of bilateral negotiations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can reproduce behavioral patterns observed in human negotiations. |