Path Drift in Large Reasoning Models: How First-Person Commitments Override Safety (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on prompt injection and jailbreak attacks primarily target the surface structure of input prompts. |
| Approach: | They propose a three-stage approach to mitigate the risk of Long-CoT reasoning drift . they propose 'path-level defense' strategy that incorporates role attribution correction and metacognitive reflection . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reduces refusal rates and ethical evaporation, while ethical escalation and layered disclaimers progressively steer models toward unsafe completions. |
Similar Papers
Chain-of-Thought Matters: Improving Long-Context Language Models with Reasoning Path Supervision (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Dawei Zhu, Xiyu Wei, Guangxiang Zhao, Wenhao Wu, Haosheng Zou, Junfeng Ran, null XWang, Lin Sun, Xiangzheng Zhang, Sujian Li
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have highlighted the challenge of handling long-context tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a chain-of-thought framework that teaches models to generate high-quality reasoning paths for enhanced long-context performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework generalizes across most long-context scenarios and amplifys with increasing context length. |
When Models Outthink Their Safety: Unveiling and Mitigating Self-Jailbreak in Large Reasoning Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yingzhi Mao, Chunkang Zhang, Junxiang Wang, Xinyan Guan, Boxi Cao, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Le Sun
| Challenge: | Existing methods often apply coarse-grained constraints over entire reasoning trajectories . Existing approaches often apply unsafe constraints, causing unsafe outputs . |
| Approach: | They propose a trajectory-level training framework that mitigates Self-Jailbreak . they propose 'chain-of-guardrail' to mitigate self-jailbreak by targeting step-level interventions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework mitigates Self-Jailbreak by targeting step-level interventions while maintaining reasoning ability. |
Thinking Traps in Long Chain-of-Thought: A Measurable Study and Trap-Aware Adaptive Restart (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
null Chenkang, Fan Yu, Junjie Nian, Sihan Zhao, Zhuoka Feng, Zijun Yao, Wang Heng, Yu Minshen, Yixin Cao
| Challenge: | Experiments show that extended generation does not guarantee correctness . a recurring pattern in Long-CoT failures is a problem for large reasoning models . |
| Approach: | They propose a test-time control framework that truncates the trajectory before the trap segment and adaptively restarts decoding. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that TAAR improves reasoning performance without fine-tuning model parameters. |
Dissecting Failure Dynamics in Large Language Model Reasoning (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models achieve strong performance through extended inference-time deliberation, yet how their reasoning failures arise remains poorly understood. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that probes and redirects critical transitions using uncertainty signals. |
| Outcome: | Empirical evaluations show that GUARD improves reasoning performance . GUard probes critical transitions and redirects them using uncertainty signals . |
Can Reasoning Path still be Effective as Input? Bridging Post-Reasoning to Chain-of-Thought Compression (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Chengzhengxu Li, Xiaoming Liu, Zhaohan Zhang, Shengchao Liu, Guoxin Ma, Yu Lan, Cong Wang, Chao Shen
| Challenge: | Existing work on reducing CoT generation in reasoning impairs the necessary information for deriving the correct answer. |
| Approach: | They propose a reasoning paradigm that takes CoT as a part of context to simplify the reasoning task for Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reduces the generation length of LLMs, but its effectiveness hinges on the efficiency and reliability of the contextual CoT generation. |
SafeChain: Safety of Language Models with Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilities (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Fengqing Jiang, Zhangchen Xu, Yuetai Li, Luyao Niu, Zhen Xiang, Bo Li, Bill Yuchen Lin, Radha Poovendran
| Challenge: | Emerging large reasoning models (LRMs) leverage long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to enhance their reasoning capabilities. |
| Approach: | They conduct a systematic study of LRM safety using human annotations to assess their safety. |
| Outcome: | The proposed safety measures are compared to state-of-the-art models on strong and wildjailbreak datasets. |
Explainable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: An Empirical Analysis on State-Aware Reasoning Dynamics (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Sheldon Yu, Yuxin Xiong, Junda Wu, Xintong Li, Tong Yu, Xiang Chen, Ritwik Sinha, Jingbo Shang, Julian McAuley
| Challenge: | Recent advances in chain-of-thought prompting have demonstrated the ability of large language models to perform multi-step reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to analyze latent dynamics of CoT trajectories for interpretability . they segment generated CoT into discrete reasoning steps and abstract each step into a spectral embedding based on token-level Gram matrices . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework segments generated CoT steps into discrete reasoning steps, abstracts each step into a spectral embedding based on token-level Gram matrices, and clusters these embeddements into semantically meaningful latent states. |
Is Chain-of-Thought Reasoning of LLMs a Mirage? A Data Distribution Lens (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Chengshuai Zhao, Zhen Tan, Pingchuan Ma, Dawei Li, Bohan Jiang, Yancheng Wang, Yingzhen Yang, Huan Liu
| Challenge: | Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been shown to be effective in eliciting structured reasoning from large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a data distribution lens to understand when and why CoT reasoning fails . they propose 'data-based' training that trains LLMs from scratch . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model enables models to generate reasoning trajectories that approximate those observed during training. |
Deciphering the Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Chain-of-Thought: Probability, Memorization, and Noisy Reasoning (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been shown to enhance the multi-step reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose to use CoT prompting to analyze a symbolic reasoning task where letters are shifted forward some number of steps in the alphabet. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on a symbolic reasoning task, with three LLMs performing the task using CoT prompts. |
Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matters (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting can dramatically improve the multi-step reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose to use Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting to encourage the LLM to generate intermediate rationales for solving a problem by providing a series of reasoning steps in the demonstrations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate coherent lines of reasoning even with invalid demonstrations while still generating coherent lines during inference. |