Chengpeng Li, Mingfeng Xue, Zhenru Zhang, Jiaxi Yang, Beichen Zhang, Bowen Yu, Binyuan Hui, Junyang Lin, Xiang Wang, Dayiheng Liu
| Challenge: | Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning through long chain-of-thought, yet they struggle with precise computations and algorithmic operations. |
| Approach: | They propose a training-free approach that activates LRMs’ latent tool-use capabilities through artificial hints and a framework that enables models to learn effective tool utilization through diverse hint patterns and rejection-based data synthesis. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that START significantly improves state-of-the-art LRMs across challenging benchmarks, including competition-level mathematics (AMC23: 95.0%, AIME24: 75.6%) and graduate-level science questions (GPQA: 64.6%). |
Similar Papers
First-Step Advantage: Importance of Starting Right in Multi-Step Math Reasoning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Language models can solve complex reasoning tasks better by learning to generate rationales for their predictions. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a larger model to guide smaller models to start . this allows them to generate rationales for their predictions when correct . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves performance on multistep reasoning datasets over multiple smaller models. |
Let’s Be Self-generated via Step by Step: A Curriculum Learning Approach to Automated Reasoning with Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing efforts to improve CoT prompting have limitations that require extensive human effort or performance needs to be improved. |
| Approach: | They propose a prompt approach for automatic reasoning called LBS3 inspired by curriculum learning which better reflects human learning habits. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves strongly competitive performance compared to baselines in reasoning-intensive tasks with varying open- and closed-source LLMs. |
RATIONALYST: Pre-training Process-Supervision for Improving Reasoning (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Dongwei Jiang, Guoxuan Wang, Yining Lu, Andrew Wang, Jingyu Zhang, Chuyu Liu, Benjamin Van Durme, Daniel Khashabi
| Challenge: | RATIONALYST is a model for process-supervision of reasoning based on pretraining on rationale annotations extracted from unlabeled data. |
| Approach: | They propose a model for process-supervision of reasoning based on pre-training on rationale annotations extracted from unlabeled data. |
| Outcome: | RATIONALYST improves reasoning accuracy by 3.9% on representative reasoning benchmarks. |
ThinkPilot: Steering Reasoning Models via Automated Think-prefixes Optimization (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) are powerful but still suffer from inefficient and off-target reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a training-free framework that automatically optimizes Large Reasoning Models' reasoning by generating think-prefixes that evolve driven by a taxonomy of reasoning behaviors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework significantly improves accuracy-length trade-off for efficient reasoning, drastically improves safety and improves instruction following. |
NEAT: Neuron-Based Early Exit for Large Reasoning Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to reduce overthinking require additional rollout computation or externally labeled datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose a Neuron-based Early reAsoning exiT framework that monitors neuron-level activation dynamics to enable training-free early exits. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reduces the amount of reasoning steps generated by LRMs while maintaining accuracy. |
Sticker-TTS: Learn to Utilize Historical Experience with a Sticker-driven Test-Time Scaling Framework (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large reasoning models have exhibited strong performance on complex reasoning tasks, but current test-time scaling methods rely on redundant sampling and ignore historical experience utilization. |
| Approach: | They propose a test-time scaling framework that coordinates three collaborative LRMs to iteratively explore and refine solutions guided by historical attempts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses strong baselines on three mathematical reasoning benchmarks, including AIME-24, AIME-25, and OlymMATH. |
TinyThinker: Distilling Reasoning through Coarse-to-Fine Knowledge Internalization with Self-Reflection (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models exhibit impressive reasoning capabilities across diverse tasks . direct training on synthesized reasoning data may lead to superficial imitation of reasoning process, authors argue . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that introduces a three-stage process that incrementally guides the student model through the reasoning process, progressively refining knowledge from coarse to fine granularity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves superior performance on commonsense reasoning benchmarks and can be extended to other knowledge-intensive reasoning tasks. |
SLR: Automated Synthesis for Scalable Logical Reasoning (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Lukas Helff, Ahmad Omar, Felix Friedrich, Antonia Wüst, Hikaru Shindo, Rupert Mitchell, Tim Woydt, Patrick Schramowski, Wolfgang Stammer, Kristian Kersting
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks intended to evaluate reasoning capabilities emphasize deductive reasoning, where conclusions necessarily follow from given premises. |
| Approach: | They propose an end-to-end framework for systematic evaluation and training of Large Language Models via Scalable Logical Reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework doubles Llama-3-8B accuracy on SLR-Bench, achieving parity with Gemini-Flash-Thinking at a fraction of computational cost. |
Teaching-Inspired Integrated Prompting Framework: A Novel Approach for Enhancing Reasoning in Large Language Models (2025.coling-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive performance across various domains but struggle with arithmetic reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a Teaching-Inspired Integrated Prompting Framework which emulates the instructional process of a teacher guiding students. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves reasoning accuracy on nine benchmarks. |
Advancing Large Language Model Attribution through Self-Improving (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Lei Huang, Xiaocheng Feng, Weitao Ma, Liang Zhao, Yuchun Fan, Weihong Zhong, Dongliang Xu, Qing Yang, Hongtao Liu, Bing Qin
| Challenge: | Teaching large language models to generate text with citations to evidence sources requires high-quality attribution data, which is costly and labor-intensive. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for iteratively improving the attribution capability of large language models (LLMs) by attributing output to verifiable sources. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on three open-domain question-answering datasets show that START improves in aggregating information across multiple sources. |