RATIONALYST: Pre-training Process-Supervision for Improving Reasoning (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Dongwei Jiang, Guoxuan Wang, Yining Lu, Andrew Wang, Jingyu Zhang, Chuyu Liu, Benjamin Van Durme, Daniel Khashabi
| Challenge: | RATIONALYST is a model for process-supervision of reasoning based on pretraining on rationale annotations extracted from unlabeled data. |
| Approach: | They propose a model for process-supervision of reasoning based on pre-training on rationale annotations extracted from unlabeled data. |
| Outcome: | RATIONALYST improves reasoning accuracy by 3.9% on representative reasoning benchmarks. |
Similar Papers
An Efficient and Precise Training Data Construction Framework for Process-supervised Reward Model in Mathematical Reasoning (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for constructing process supervision training data are costly or suffer from poor quality. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework called EpicPRM which annotates each intermediate reasoning step based on its quantified contribution and uses an adaptive binary search algorithm to enhance annotation precision and efficiency. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves annotation precision and efficiency and can be used to train a high-quality training dataset with 50k annotated intermediate steps. |
Complex Reasoning in Natural Language (2023.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research shows that pretrained language models are often brittle for complex reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use pre-trained language models to teach machines to reason over texts . they will review recent promising approaches to tackling complex reasoning tasks . |
| Outcome: | This tutorial reviews promising approaches to complex reasoning tasks . it reviews the methods that can be used to augment models with robustness . |
Self-training with Few-shot Rationalization (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work focused on training largescale and complex neural network models, but they are opaque in terms of their decision-making process. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-task teacher-student framework for self-training pre-trained language models with limited task-specific labels and annotated rationales. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves performance in low-resource settings by making it aware of its rationalized predictions. |
Dissecting Logical Reasoning in LLMs: A Fine-Grained Evaluation and Supervision Study (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Yujun Zhou, Jiayi Ye, Zipeng Ling, Yufei Han, Yue Huang, Haomin Zhuang, Zhenwen Liang, Kehan Guo, Taicheng Guo, Xiangqi Wang, Xiangliang Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks that rely on final-answer accuracy fail to capture the quality of the reasoning process. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained evaluation framework that assesses logical reasoning across three dimensions: overall accuracy, stepwise soundness, and representation-level probing. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework assesses logical reasoning across three dimensions: overall accuracy, stepwise soundness, and representation-level probing. |
Step Guided Reasoning: Improving Mathematical Reasoning using Guidance Generation and Step Reasoning (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to improve mathematical reasoning require extensive datasets for training or depend on few-shot methods that compromise computational accuracy. |
| Approach: | They propose a training-free adaptation framework that efficiently equips general-purpose pre-trained language models with enhanced mathematical reasoning capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms Qwen2.5-72B-Math-Instruct on MMLU-STEM with a score of 90.9%, compared to 87.3%. |
Assessing LLM Reasoning Steps via Principal Knowledge Grounding (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Hyeon Hwang, Yewon Cho, Chanwoong Yoon, Yein Park, Minju Song, Kyungjae Lee, Gangwoo Kim, Jaewoo Kang
| Challenge: | Step-by-step reasoning has become a standard approach for large language models to tackle complex tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that assesses the knowledge grounding of intermediate reasoning by using a large-scale repository of atomic knowledge essential for reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The evaluation suite identifies missing or misapplied knowledge elements and provides crucial insights for uncovering fundamental reasoning deficiencies in LLMs. |
Current Advances in LLM Reasoning (2026.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial examines comprehensive evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) advanced inference time methods and post-training methods that aim to make LLMs think more like humans are discussed in this tutorial. |
| Approach: | This tutorial explores comprehensive evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) and discusses two types of methods to improve models’ reasoning: advanced inference time methods, structured and self-improvement inference methods, and post-training methods, such as RLHF, DPO, and GRPO. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial examines evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models and discusses two types of methods to improve models’ reasoning. |
LLM2: Let Large Language Models Harness System 2 Reasoning (2025.naacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Empirical results on mathematical reasoning benchmarks substantiate the efficacy of Large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that combines an LLM with a process-based verifier to generate plausible candidates and provide timely process-driven feedback to distinguish desirable and undesirable outputs. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that LLM2 improves accuracy on GSM8K and self-consistency increases major@20 accuracy. |
Exploring Self-supervised Logic-enhanced Training for Large Language Models (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Traditional attempts to enhance the logical reasoning abilities of language models often rely on supervised fine-tuning, limiting their generalization to new tasks or domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for integrating logical reasoning capabilities into LLMs and activating them via in-context learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves comparable results to existing models on three language understanding benchmarks. |
ALERT: Adapt Language Models to Reasoning Tasks (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ping Yu, Tianlu Wang, Olga Golovneva, Badr AlKhamissi, Siddharth Verma, Zhijing Jin, Gargi Ghosh, Mona Diab, Asli Celikyilmaz
| Challenge: | Large language models have shown increasing in-context learning capabilities with scaling up the model and data sizes. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark and suite of analyses to evaluate reasoning skills of large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model compares pre-trained and fine-tuned models on tasks that require reasoning skills to solve. |