CondAmbigQA: A Benchmark and Dataset for Conditional Ambiguous Question Answering (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) generate unreliable responses due to their cognitive alignment of context and intent. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to identify possible implicit assumptions in QA questions . they use retrieved Wikipedia fragments to identify interpretations for a given query . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark identifies possible implicit assumptions and improves answer accuracy by 11.75% . retrieved Wikipedia fragments help identify possible interpretations for a given query . |
Similar Papers
Model Analysis & Evaluation for Ambiguous Question Answering (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Ambiguous questions are a challenge for Question Answering models as they require answers that cover multiple interpretations of the original query. |
| Approach: | They aim to investigate whether model/data scaling improves the answers’ quality and whether automated metrics align with human judgment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can generate long-form answers that combine conflicting information and provide valuable insights into the limitations of the current approaches. |
AmbigQA: Answering Ambiguous Open-domain Questions (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing open-domain question answering systems assume questions have a single welldefined answer. |
| Approach: | They propose an open-domain question answering task which involves finding every plausible answer and rewriting the question for each one to resolve the ambiguity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task is based on a dataset covering 14,042 open-domain questions . it shows that strong models benefit from weakly supervised learning . |
ASQA: Factoid Questions Meet Long-Form Answers (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent progress on factoid question answering (QA) does not easily transfer to the task of long-form QA where the goal is to generate detailed explanations. |
| Approach: | They propose a task that focuses on ambiguous factoid questions which have different correct answers depending on interpretation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric is reliable and demonstrates agreement between this metric and human judgments, and reveals a considerable gap between human performance and strong baselines. |
Asking Clarification Questions to Handle Ambiguity in Open-Domain QA (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Ambiguous questions persist in open-domain question answering because formulating a precise question with a unique answer is often challenging. |
| Approach: | They propose to ask a clarification question where the user’s response will help identify the interpretation that best aligns with the user's intention. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves F1 of 61.3, 25.1, and 40.5 on the three tasks, demonstrating the need for further improvements while providing competitive baselines for future work. |
CLAMBER: A Benchmark of Identifying and Clarifying Ambiguous Information Needs in Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Tong Zhang, Peixin Qin, Yang Deng, Chen Huang, Wenqiang Lei, Junhong Liu, Dingnan Jin, Hongru Liang, Tat-Seng Chua
| Challenge: | Large language models are used to meet user information needs, but their effectiveness in dealing with user queries that contain various types of ambiguity remains unknown. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for evaluating large language models using a well-organized taxonomy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on a well-organized taxonomy and compares it with other models. |
Teaching Vision-Language Models to Ask: Resolving Ambiguity in Visual Questions (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research addresses ambiguous visual questions by rephrasing questions, but it fails to address the inherently interactive nature of user interactions with visual language models (VLMs). Existing studies focus on re-phrase questions, and lack of a benchmark to assess VLMs’ capacity for resolving ambiguities through interaction. |
| Approach: | They propose a visual question answering task that provides a natural language answer to a question based on a given image and an automated pipeline to generate ambiguity-clarification question pairs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark targets three common categories of ambiguity in visual question answering (VQA) context and encompasses various VQA scenarios. |
PRACTIQ: A Practical Conversational Text-to-SQL dataset with Ambiguous and Unanswerable Queries (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Mingwen Dong, Nischal Ashok Kumar, Yiqun Hu, Anuj Chauhan, Chung-Wei Hang, Shuaichen Chang, Lin Pan, Wuwei Lan, Henghui Zhu, Jiarong Jiang, Patrick Ng, Zhiguo Wang
| Challenge: | Existing text-to-SQL systems focus on user questions with clear intentions that can be answered, but real user questions can be ambiguous with multiple interpretations or unanswerable due to a lack of relevant data. |
| Approach: | They construct a conversational text-to-SQL dataset called PRACTIQ, consisting of ambiguous and unanswerable questions inspired by real-world user questions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system generates conversations with four turns, generating the user’s question, an assistant response seeking clarification, and the user's clarified SQL response with the natural language explanation of the execution results. |
DebateQA: Evaluating Question Answering on Debatable Knowledge (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing QA benchmarks that provide fixed answers to debatable questions are inadequate for evaluating their performance. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a dataset of 2,941 debatable questions to assess their ability to provide comprehensive answers to inherently debatably asked questions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on 2,941 debatable questions accompanied by human-annotated partial answers that capture a variety of perspectives. |
Answering Ambiguous Questions through Generative Evidence Fusion and Round-Trip Prediction (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yifan Gao, Henghui Zhu, Patrick Ng, Cicero Nogueira dos Santos, Zhiguo Wang, Feng Nan, Dejiao Zhang, Ramesh Nallapati, Andrew O. Arnold, Bing Xiang
| Challenge: | Open-domain question answering is a task to answer questions using passages with diverse topics. |
| Approach: | They propose a model that aggregates evidence from multiple passages to adaptively predict a single answer or a set of question-answer pairs for ambiguous questions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art performance on AmbigQA dataset and shows competitive performance on NQ-Open and TriviaQA. |
RoMQA: A Benchmark for Robust, Multi-evidence, Multi-answer Question Answering (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing QA models are not robust to variations in question constraints, but can be made more robust by tuning on clusters of related questions. |
| Approach: | They introduce RoMQA, the first benchmark for robust, multi-evidence, multianswer question answering (QA) RoMQ contains clusters of related questions that are derived from the Wikidata knowledge graph . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is the first benchmark for robust, multi-evidence, multianswer question answering (QA) compared to prior QA datasets, it has more human-written questions that require reasoning over more evidence text and have, on average, many more correct answers. |