Challenge: Existing open-domain question answering systems assume questions have a single welldefined answer.
Approach: They propose an open-domain question answering task which involves finding every plausible answer and rewriting the question for each one to resolve the ambiguity.
Outcome: The proposed task is based on a dataset covering 14,042 open-domain questions . it shows that strong models benefit from weakly supervised learning .

Similar Papers

Asking Clarification Questions to Handle Ambiguity in Open-Domain QA (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Ambiguous questions persist in open-domain question answering because formulating a precise question with a unique answer is often challenging.
Approach: They propose to ask a clarification question where the user’s response will help identify the interpretation that best aligns with the user's intention.
Outcome: The proposed approach achieves F1 of 61.3, 25.1, and 40.5 on the three tasks, demonstrating the need for further improvements while providing competitive baselines for future work.
Detecting Temporal Ambiguity in Questions (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Ambiguous questions have different answers depending on their interpretation and can take diverse forms.
Approach: They propose a manually annotated temporally ambiguous QA dataset that captures temporal ambiguity and propose different search strategies based on disambiguate versions of the questions.
Outcome: The proposed approach captures temporal ambiguity and provides non-search, competitive baselines for detecting temporal and few-shot ambiguities.
CondAmbigQA: A Benchmark and Dataset for Conditional Ambiguous Question Answering (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) generate unreliable responses due to their cognitive alignment of context and intent.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to identify possible implicit assumptions in QA questions . they use retrieved Wikipedia fragments to identify interpretations for a given query .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark identifies possible implicit assumptions and improves answer accuracy by 11.75% . retrieved Wikipedia fragments help identify possible interpretations for a given query .
Model Analysis & Evaluation for Ambiguous Question Answering (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Ambiguous questions are a challenge for Question Answering models as they require answers that cover multiple interpretations of the original query.
Approach: They aim to investigate whether model/data scaling improves the answers’ quality and whether automated metrics align with human judgment.
Outcome: The proposed models can generate long-form answers that combine conflicting information and provide valuable insights into the limitations of the current approaches.
Answering Ambiguous Questions through Generative Evidence Fusion and Round-Trip Prediction (2021.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Open-domain question answering is a task to answer questions using passages with diverse topics.
Approach: They propose a model that aggregates evidence from multiple passages to adaptively predict a single answer or a set of question-answer pairs for ambiguous questions.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art performance on AmbigQA dataset and shows competitive performance on NQ-Open and TriviaQA.
Answering Ambiguous Questions via Iterative Prompting (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Empirical studies show that AmbigPrompt achieves state-of-the-art or competitive results while using less memory and having a lower inference latency than competing approaches.
Approach: They propose an answering model with a prompting model to address imperfections in open-domain question answering . Empirical studies show AmbigPrompt achieves state-of-the-art or competitive results .
Outcome: The proposed framework improves on two commonly-used open benchmarks and achieves state-of-the-art or competitive results while using less memory and having a lower inference latency.
ASQA: Factoid Questions Meet Long-Form Answers (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent progress on factoid question answering (QA) does not easily transfer to the task of long-form QA where the goal is to generate detailed explanations.
Approach: They propose a task that focuses on ambiguous factoid questions which have different correct answers depending on interpretation.
Outcome: The proposed metric is reliable and demonstrates agreement between this metric and human judgments, and reveals a considerable gap between human performance and strong baselines.
Tree of Clarifications: Answering Ambiguous Questions with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: In open-domain question answering, users often ask ambiguous questions (AQs) . one approach is to identify all possible interpretations of the AQ and generate a long-form answer addressing them all.
Approach: They propose a framework that generates a long-form answer addressing all possible interpretations of an ambiguous question.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms baselines on ASQA in a few-shot setup across metrics while surpassing fully-supervised baselines trained on the whole training set in terms of Disambig-F1 and Disambigo-ROUGE.
AmbigNLG: Addressing Task Ambiguity in Instruction for NLG (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: AmbigNLG is a novel task designed to tackle task ambiguity in instructions for NLG . ambiguous instructions often impede the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) .
Approach: They propose an ambiguity taxonomy that categorizes different types of instruction ambiguities and refines initial instructions with clearer specifications.
Outcome: The proposed task improves alignment of generated text with user expectations, achieving 15.02-point increase in ROUGE scores.
Disambiguation in Conversational Question Answering in the Era of LLMs and Agents: A Survey (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing literature on ambiguity and disambiguation with Large Language Models (LLMs) ambiguities are a fundamental challenge in human-AI interactions due to complexity and flexibility of human language.
Approach: They propose to define key terms and concepts and categorize various disambiguation approaches enabled by LLMs and provide a comparative analysis of their advantages and disadvantages.
Outcome: The proposed frameworks are compared against different disambiguation approaches and highlight their relevance for future research.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations