ASQA: Factoid Questions Meet Long-Form Answers (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent progress on factoid question answering (QA) does not easily transfer to the task of long-form QA where the goal is to generate detailed explanations.
Approach: They propose a task that focuses on ambiguous factoid questions which have different correct answers depending on interpretation.
Outcome: The proposed metric is reliable and demonstrates agreement between this metric and human judgments, and reveals a considerable gap between human performance and strong baselines.

Similar Papers

Concise Answers to Complex Questions: Summarization of Long-form Answers (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Long-form question answering systems provide rich information by presenting paragraph-level answers, but not all information is required to answer the question.
Approach: They propose an extract-and-decontextualize approach to summarize long-form answers using state-of-the-art models.
Outcome: The proposed extract-and-decontextualize approach improves the quality of the extractive summary, exemplifying its potential in the summarization task.
AmbigQA: Answering Ambiguous Open-domain Questions (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing open-domain question answering systems assume questions have a single welldefined answer.
Approach: They propose an open-domain question answering task which involves finding every plausible answer and rewriting the question for each one to resolve the ambiguity.
Outcome: The proposed task is based on a dataset covering 14,042 open-domain questions . it shows that strong models benefit from weakly supervised learning .
CondAmbigQA: A Benchmark and Dataset for Conditional Ambiguous Question Answering (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) generate unreliable responses due to their cognitive alignment of context and intent.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to identify possible implicit assumptions in QA questions . they use retrieved Wikipedia fragments to identify interpretations for a given query .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark identifies possible implicit assumptions and improves answer accuracy by 11.75% . retrieved Wikipedia fragments help identify possible interpretations for a given query .
ComQA: A Community-sourced Dataset for Complex Factoid Question Answering with Paraphrase Clusters (N19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: ComQA dataset captures question phenomena and the diverse ways in which they are formulated.
Approach: They propose a large dataset of real user questions that captures question phenomena and the diverse ways in which they are formulated.
Outcome: The proposed dataset can be a driver of future research on factoid question answering (QA).
Model Analysis & Evaluation for Ambiguous Question Answering (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Ambiguous questions are a challenge for Question Answering models as they require answers that cover multiple interpretations of the original query.
Approach: They aim to investigate whether model/data scaling improves the answers’ quality and whether automated metrics align with human judgment.
Outcome: The proposed models can generate long-form answers that combine conflicting information and provide valuable insights into the limitations of the current approaches.
WikiHowQA: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multi-Document Non-Factoid Question Answering (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Answering non-factoid questions (NFQs) is a challenging task, requiring passage-level answers that are difficult to construct and evaluate.
Approach: They propose a multi-document NFQA benchmark built on WikiHow, a website dedicated to answering “how-to” questions.
Outcome: The proposed framework includes 11,746 human-written answers along with 74,527 supporting documents.
MinosEval: Distinguishing Factoid and Non-Factoid for Tailored Open-Ended QA Evaluation with LLMs (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation methods overlook the distinction between factoid and non-factoidic questions.
Approach: They propose a method that distinguishes open-ended questions and ranks candidate answers . they propose QA requires longer answer statements and nuanced reasoning processes .
Outcome: The proposed method better aligns with human annotations and offers more interpretable results.
IfQA: A Dataset for Open-domain Question Answering under Counterfactual Presuppositions (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing open-domain QA tasks focus on questions whose answer can be deduced directly from global factual knowledge.
Approach: They propose a dataset where each question is based on a counterfactual presupposition via an "if" clause.
Outcome: The IfQA dataset contains 3,800 questions that were annotated by crowdworkers on relevant Wikipedia passages.
NoiseQA: Challenge Set Evaluation for User-Centric Question Answering (2021.eacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Question-Answering (QA) systems are deployed in the real world . a lack of research attention has been devoted to studying the issues that arise when people use QA systems.
Approach: They show that component components that precede an answering engine can introduce varied and considerable sources of error.
Outcome: The proposed evaluations highlight the need for QA evaluation to expand to consider real-world use.
PEDANTS: Cheap but Effective and Interpretable Answer Equivalence (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current short-form QA evaluations lack diverse styles of evaluation data and rely on expensive and slow LLMs.
Approach: They propose a rubric for machine QA that is more stable than an exact match and neural methods.
Outcome: The proposed evaluations improve on the existing short-form QA evaluations using the Trivia community.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations