Debate-to-Write: A Persona-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Diverse Argument Generation (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Writing arguments requires integrating high-level beliefs from various perspectives . current language models generate outputs autoregressively, resulting in limited diversity and coherence . |
| Approach: | They propose a persona-based multi-agent framework for argument writing that integrates beliefs from different perspectives into a coherent narrative. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework generates more diverse arguments by both automatic and human evaluations. |
Similar Papers
Tree-of-Debate: Multi-Persona Debate Trees Elicit Critical Thinking for Scientific Comparative Analysis (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing comparative summarization methods focus on surface-level semantic differences, which may not capture the most relevant distinctions. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework which transforms scientific papers into LLM personas that debate their respective novelties. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework generates informative arguments and effectively contrasts papers, and supports researchers in their literature review. |
Plan Dynamically, Express Rhetorically: A Debate-Driven Rhetorical Framework for Argumentative Writing (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argumentative essay generation (AEG) is a complex task that requires advanced semantic understanding, logical reasoning, and organized integration of perspectives. |
| Approach: | They propose a debate-driven rhetorical framework for argumentative writing that integrates Bitzer’s rhetorical situation theory to improve logical depth, argumentative diversity, and rhetorical persuasiveness. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves logical depth, argumentative diversity, and rhetorical persuasiveness over existing state-of-the-art models. |
A Multi-persona Framework for Argument Quality Assessment (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for argument quality assessment do not consider multi-perspective evaluation due to subjective nature of arguments. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-persona framework for argument quality assessment that simulates diverse evaluator perspectives through large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baselines while providing comprehensive multi-perspective rationales on IBM-Rank-30k and IBM-ArgQ-5.3kArgs datasets. |
ARGSBASE: A Multi-Agent Interface for Structured Human–AI Deliberation (2026.eacl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new deliberation interface enables users to engage with multiple large language models (LLMs) ArgsBase exemplifies hybrid argumentation and supports epistemically responsible human–AI collaboration. |
| Approach: | They propose a deliberation interface that enables users to engage with multiple large language models coordinated by a moderator agent. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system exemplifies hybrid argumentation and aligns with recent calls for "reasonable parrots" the user study shows that the tool is easy to use, perspective-enhancing, and promising for research . |
DEBATE: Devil’s Advocate-Based Assessment and Text Evaluation (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for evaluating the quality of machine-generated texts have a relatively low correlation with human performance. |
| Approach: | They propose an NLG evaluation framework based on multi-agent scoring system augmented with a concept of Devil’s Advocate. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework outperforms the previous state-of-the-art methods in two meta-evaluation benchmarks in NLG evaluation, SummEval and TopicalChat. |
Advances in Debating Technologies: Building AI That Can Debate Humans (2021.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial focuses on Debating Technologies, a sub-field of computational argumentation defined as "computational technologies developed directly to enhance, support, and engage with human debating" the tutorial provides a holistic view of a debated system, and discusses practical applications and future challenges of debation technologies. |
| Approach: | They present a tutorial on Debating Technologies, a sub-field of computational argumentation . they introduce Project Debater, which is the first AI system to debate human experts . |
| Outcome: | The project Debater is the first AI system to debate human experts on complex topics. |
Paper2Rebuttal: A Multi-Agent Framework for Transparent Author Response Assistance (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current approaches to writing effective rebuttals are limited by the direct-to-text generation problem . authors must accurately decipher reviewer intent while ensuring every response is firmly anchored in verifiable manuscript details. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that reframes rebuttal generation as an evidence-centric planning task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baselines in coverage, faithfulness, and strategic coherence. |
AEG: Argumentative Essay Generation via A Dual-Decoder Model with Content Planning (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on argument generation focus on generating individual short arguments, while research on generating long and coherent argumentative essays is under-explored. |
| Approach: | They propose a task to automatically generate argumentative essays using a writing prompt. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model generates persuasive essays with higher diversity and less repetition compared to baselines. |
Multiple LLM Agents Debate for Equitable Cultural Alignment (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent efforts focus on single-LLM, single-turn generation approaches, but it can be challenging for any single model to support all cultures equally well. |
| Approach: | They propose to exploit the complementary strengths of multiple LLMs to promote cultural adaptability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves accuracy and cultural group parity over single-LLM models. |
MALLM: Multi-Agent Large Language Models Framework (2025.emnlp-demos)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multi-agent debate (MAD) has demonstrated the ability to augment collective intelligence by scaling test-time compute and leveraging expertise. |
| Approach: | They propose an open-source framework that enables systematic analysis of multi-agent debates. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enables systematic analysis of multi-agent debate components. |