Challenge: Existing metrics for multimodal large language models only focus on token overlap and may not align with human judgment.
Approach: They propose an open-source model that assesses the question answering abilities of multimodal large language models.
Outcome: Experiments show that the ACE-M3 model performs better than existing models and is more reliable than existing metrics.

Similar Papers

MLLM-Bench: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs with Per-sample Criteria (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation methodologies for multimodal large language models are limited in evaluating objective queries without considering real-world user experiences.
Approach: They propose to evaluate multimodal large language models with per-sample criteria using potent MLLM as the judge.
Outcome: The proposed evaluation paradigm shows that it can be used to evaluate multimodal large language models with per-sample criteria.
AutoMedEval: Harnessing Language Models for Automatic Medical Capability Evaluation (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation methods based on large language models (LLMs) are expensive and lack expertise due to limitations in human expertise.
Approach: They propose an open-source automatic evaluation model with 13B parameters specifically engineered to measure the question-answering proficiency of medical LLMs.
Outcome: The proposed model surpasses baselines in terms of correlation with human judgments.
Asclepius: A Spectrum Evaluation Benchmark for Medical Multi-Modal Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Medical Multi-Modal Large Language Models (Med-MLLMs) are a promising new form of artificial general intelligence due to their ability to tackle complex tasks.
Approach: They propose a new benchmark that comprehensively assesses medical multi-modal large language models in terms of distinct medical specialties and different diagnostic capacities.
Outcome: The proposed model covers 15 medical specialties and different diagnostic capacities, and excludes overlap with existing VQA dataset.
MM-LLMs: Recent Advances in MultiModal Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: MultiModal Large Language Models (MM-LLMs) have undergone significant advances in the past year . traditional MM models incur substantial computational costs, especially when trained from scratch .
Approach: They propose a taxonomy encompassing 126 MM-LLMs and summarize key training recipes to enhance their potency.
Outcome: The proposed models preserve the reasoning and decision-making capabilities of LLMs and empower diverse range of MM tasks.
AutoJudger: An Agent-Driven Framework for Efficient Benchmarking of MLLMs (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Evaluating multimodal large language models (MLLMs) is becoming increasingly expensive as benchmarks grow in scale and cross-modality complexity.
Approach: They propose an adaptive evaluation framework for efficient benchmarking that treats evaluation as an interview-like process by keeping a hypothesized ability structure of the evaluated model and actively selecting the informative questions.
Outcome: Experiments on four representative multimodal benchmarks show that **A2-Judger significantly improves sample efficiency while maintaining reliable evaluation results.
M3Retrieve: Benchmarking Multimodal Retrieval for Medicine (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Strong retrieval models are increasingly important in knowledge-intensive domains.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate multimodal retrieval models in medical settings . they examine 1.2 million text documents and 164K multimodal queries .
Outcome: The proposed model spans 5 domains,16 medical fields, and 4 distinct tasks with over 1.2 Million text documents and 164K multimodal queries.
MMedAgent: Learning to Use Medical Tools with Multi-modal Agent (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) exhibit limited generality and often fall short when compared to specialized models.
Approach: They propose a multi-modal medical agent that picks the most suitable medical tools based on user inputs.
Outcome: The proposed agent performs better than open-source models and the closed-source model, GPT-4o.
MEDSYN: Benchmarking Multi-EviDence SYNthesis in Complex Clinical Cases for Multimodal Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for multimodal large language models do not capture real-world clinical complexity.
Approach: They evaluate multilingual, multimodal multimodal models of clinical cases with up to 7 distinct visual clinical evidence types per case.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms human models on differential diagnosis (DDx) generation and final diagnosis (FDx) selection.
LLMEval-Med: A Real-world Clinical Benchmark for Medical LLMs with Physician Validation (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current medical benchmarks have limitations in question design, data sources and evaluation methods.
Approach: They propose a new benchmark covering five core medical areas . it includes 2,996 questions created from real-world electronic health records .
Outcome: The proposed model covers five core medical areas and includes 2,996 questions created from real-world electronic health records and expert-designed clinical scenarios.
MM-JudgeBias: A Benchmark for Evaluating Compositional Biases in MLLM-as-a-Judge (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly used as automatic judges . however, their reliability and vulnerabilities to biases remain underexplored .
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate MLLMs that fail to integrate visual cues . they also introduce a test to evaluate the reliability of MLMLs based on a set of asymmetric evaluation tendencies.
Outcome: Experiments on 26 state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal modality neglect and asymmetric evaluation tendencies . a standardized model with a benchmark enables a fine-grained diagnosis of nine bias types .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations