PhysReason: A Comprehensive Benchmark towards Physics-Based Reasoning (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xinyu Zhang, Yuxuan Dong, Yanrui Wu, Jiaxing Huang, Chengyou Jia, Basura Fernando, Mike Zheng Shou, Lingling Zhang, Jun Liu
| Challenge: | Large language models demonstrate remarkable capabilities across various domains, including mathematics and logic reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a physics-based reasoning benchmark that includes physics theorems and constraints and a Physics Solution Auto Scoring Framework to evaluate physics based reasoning in large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enables models to achieve less than 60% on answer-level evaluation, with performance dropping from knowledge questions (75.11%) to hard problems (31.99%). |
Similar Papers
PhysicsArena: The First Multimodal Physics Reasoning Benchmark Exploring Variable, Process, and Solution Dimensions (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Song Dai, Yibo Yan, Jiamin Su, Zihao Dongfang, Yubo Gao, Yonghua Hei, Jungang Li, Junyan Zhang, Sicheng Tao, Zhuoran Gao, Xuming Hu
| Challenge: | Current physics benchmarks focus on text-only inputs or only on problem-solving . current physics reasoning benchmarks neglect critical intermediate steps of variable identification and process formulation. |
| Approach: | a new benchmark evaluates multimodal large language models in physics reasoning . the benchmark measures variables, process formulations, and solution derivation . |
| Outcome: | PhysicsArena is the first multimodal physics reasoning benchmark . it evaluates MLLMs across three critical dimensions: variable identification, process formulation, and solution derivation. |
Physics: Benchmarking Foundation Models on University-Level Physics Problem Solving (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a benchmark for university-level physics problem solving contains 1,297 expert-annotated problems . a proprietary model, o3-mini, achieves only 59.9% accuracy, highlighting fundamental weaknesses in scientific reasoning, conceptual understanding, and mathematical precision. |
| Approach: | They introduce Physics, a benchmark for university-level physics problem solving. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves only 59.9% accuracy on the most advanced model, o3-mini . the proposed model is a powerful tool for evaluating models on advanced problems . |
Physics Reasoner: Knowledge-Augmented Reasoning for Solving Physics Problems with Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Xinyu Pang, Ruixin Hong, Zhanke Zhou, Fangrui Lv, Xinwei Yang, Zhilong Liang, Bo Han, Changshui Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing large language models (LLMs) fail due to lack of knowledge or incorrect knowledge application. |
| Approach: | They propose a knowledge-augmented framework that constructs a formula set to provide explicit physics knowledge and utilizes checklists to guide effective knowledge application. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on SciBench with an average accuracy improvement of 5.8%. |
SciVQR: A Multidisciplinary Multimodal Benchmark for Advanced Scientific Reasoning Evaluation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for multimodal large language models fail to capture complexity and traceability of reasoning processes . SciVQR includes domain-specific visuals and challenges models to combine visual comprehension with reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal benchmark for scientific reasoning covering 54 subfields . SciVQR includes domain-specific visuals and challenges models to combine visual comprehension with reasoning . |
| Outcome: | SciVQR evaluates 54 subfields in mathematics, physics, chemistry, geography, astronomy, and biology . the results highlight the need for improved multi-step reasoning and integration of interdisciplinary knowledge . |
PhysPRM: A Generative Process Reward Model with Fine-grained Diagnosis for Physics Problem Solving (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with physics problem solving due to difficulties in decoding implicit constraints and maintaining physical consistency. |
| Approach: | They propose a Generative PRM that treats evaluation as a generative task . it produces fine-grained diagnoses comprising critiques, final judgments, and specific error types . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves performance across seven benchmarks in Best-of-N and critique refinement strategies. |
Tiered Reasoning for Intuitive Physics: Toward Verifiable Commonsense Language Understanding (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large-scale, pre-trained language models (LMs) have achieved human-level performance on a breadth of language understanding tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a commonsense reasoning dataset with dense annotations that allows multi-tiered evaluation of machines’ reasoning process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can achieve high end performance but struggle to support predictions with valid supporting evidence. |
SymPyBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for Scientific Reasoning with Executable Python Code (2026.eacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks do not capture the complexity of structured, step-by-step reasoning essential in physics and related domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale synthetic benchmark of 15K university-level physics problems . they use structured, step-by-step reasoning and executable Python code to produce the ground-truth solution. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on a set of 15K university-level physics problems with three question types. |
Exploring the Numerical Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models: A Comprehensive Analysis on Tabular Data (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent benchmarks have assessed language models' numerical abilities . limitations include tokenization and representation of numbers in text, hallucination, and a lack of numerical commonsense knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose a hierarchical taxonomy for numerical reasoning skills that includes representation, number sense, manipulation, and complex reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms other models on the tabular Natural Language Inference task. |
FinanceReasoning: Benchmarking Financial Numerical Reasoning More Credible, Comprehensive and Challenging (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zichen Tang, Haihong E, Ziyan Ma, Haoyang He, Jiacheng Liu, Zhongjun Yang, Zihua Rong, Rongjin Li, Kun Ji, Qing Huang, Xinyang Hu, Yang Liu, Qianhe Zheng
| Challenge: | Compared to existing benchmarks, FinanceReasoning provides three key advancements: (1) credibility; (2) comprehensiveness; (3) numerical precision; (4) complexity; (5) complexity; and (6) complexity. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of large reasoning models (LRMs) in financial numerical reasoning problems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark exceeds existing benchmarks in 67.8% of financial concepts and formulas and is credible, comprehensive, and challenging. |
FormulaReasoning: A Dataset for Formula-Based Numerical Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing datasets for numerical reasoning often lack explicit knowledge of formulas . current datasets do not provide process supervision information, resulting in incomplete reasoning . |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for formula-based numerical reasoning with 5,324 questions . they provide annotations in English and Chinese and a formula database as an external knowledge source . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model includes 5,324 questions requiring calculations grounded in external physics principles. |