Papers by Xinwei Yang
ReviewRL: Towards Automated Scientific Review with RL (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Sihang Zeng, Kai Tian, Kaiyan Zhang, Yuru Wang, Junqi Gao, Runze Liu, Sa Yang, Jingxuan Li, Xinwei Long, Jiaheng Ma, Biqing Qi, Bowen Zhou
| Challenge: | Existing automated review systems struggle with factual accuracy, rating consistency, and analytical depth. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for generating comprehensive and factually grounded scientific paper reviews using supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods on ICLR 2025 papers. |
Empathy in Diversity: Personalized Depression and Anxiety Therapy via Dialogue State Tracking and Patient-Aware Planning (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xinwei Yang, Junyi Fan, Yuqing Liu, Jiaxuan Wang, Jiashuai Zhang, Hongru Liang, Wenqiang Lei, Yao Song
| Challenge: | Recent efforts have turned to large language models (LLMs) as therapeutic agents for psychological therapy tasks, yet robustness across diverse patients remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a realistic role-play protocol for evaluating therapeutic dialogue agents and a de-identified, expert-annotated corpus of therapist–patient dialogues. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baselines on therapeutic outcomes and dialogue quality while improving conversational efficiency. |
CANDY: Benchmarking LLMs’ Limitations and Assistive Potential in Chinese Misinformation Fact-Checking (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | CANDY is a benchmark to evaluate the capabilities and limitations of large language models (LLMs) for fact-checking misinformation. |
| Approach: | a team of researchers develop a benchmark to evaluate the capabilities and limitations of large language models in fact-checking misinformation in Chinese. |
| Outcome: | CANDY is a benchmark to evaluate the capabilities and limitations of large language models in fact-checking misinformation in China. |
ELABORATION: A Comprehensive Benchmark on Human-LLM Competitive Programming (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on human-LLM competitive programming use scattered, application-specific human feedback. |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy of human feedback consolidating the entire programming process, which promotes fine-grained evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark pinpoints strengths and weaknesses of existing methods and will be openly released. |
Physics Reasoner: Knowledge-Augmented Reasoning for Solving Physics Problems with Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Xinyu Pang, Ruixin Hong, Zhanke Zhou, Fangrui Lv, Xinwei Yang, Zhilong Liang, Bo Han, Changshui Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing large language models (LLMs) fail due to lack of knowledge or incorrect knowledge application. |
| Approach: | They propose a knowledge-augmented framework that constructs a formula set to provide explicit physics knowledge and utilizes checklists to guide effective knowledge application. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on SciBench with an average accuracy improvement of 5.8%. |