FinanceReasoning: Benchmarking Financial Numerical Reasoning More Credible, Comprehensive and Challenging (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zichen Tang, Haihong E, Ziyan Ma, Haoyang He, Jiacheng Liu, Zhongjun Yang, Zihua Rong, Rongjin Li, Kun Ji, Qing Huang, Xinyang Hu, Yang Liu, Qianhe Zheng
| Challenge: | Compared to existing benchmarks, FinanceReasoning provides three key advancements: (1) credibility; (2) comprehensiveness; (3) numerical precision; (4) complexity; (5) complexity; and (6) complexity. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of large reasoning models (LRMs) in financial numerical reasoning problems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark exceeds existing benchmarks in 67.8% of financial concepts and formulas and is credible, comprehensive, and challenging. |
Similar Papers
BizBench: A Quantitative Reasoning Benchmark for Business and Finance (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Answering questions within business and finance requires reasoning, precision, and a wide-breadth of technical knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for evaluating models’ ability to reason about realistic financial problems by focusing on question-answering over financial data via program synthesis. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates models' financial background knowledge, ability to parse financial documents, and capacity to solve complex problems with code. |
KnowledgeFMath: A Knowledge-Intensive Math Reasoning Dataset in Finance Domains (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) are only 56.6% accurate, leaving room for improvement. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLMs' capabilities in solving knowledge-intensive math reasoning problems using a finance-domain knowledge bank and expert-annotated solution references. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system achieves only 56.6% accuracy, leaving room for improvement. |
XFinBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Complex Financial Problem Solving and Reasoning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing large language models (LLMs) lack advanced capabilities such as temporal reasoning, future forecasting, and numerical modeling. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmarking tool to evaluate LLMs' ability to solve complex financial problems across diverse graduate-level finance topics with multi-modal context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on the o1 model but still lags behind human experts in temporal reasoning and scenario planning capabilities. |
FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Zhiyu Chen, Wenhu Chen, Charese Smiley, Sameena Shah, Iana Borova, Dylan Langdon, Reema Moussa, Matt Beane, Ting-Hao Huang, Bryan Routledge, William Yang Wang
| Challenge: | Popular, large, pre-trained models fall far short of expert humans in acquiring finance knowledge and in complex multi-step numerical reasoning on that knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale dataset with Question-Answering pairs over financial reports written by financial experts to facilitate analytical progress. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset is the first of its kind and is available on github. |
How Reliable are Confidence Estimators for Large Reasoning Models? A Systematic Benchmark on High-Stakes Domains (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Reza Khanmohammadi, Erfan Miahi, Simerjot Kaur, Charese Smiley, Ivan Brugere, Kundan S Thind, Mohammad M. Ghassemi
| Challenge: | Large Reasoning Models often struggle with confidence calibration, authors say . authors: accurate confidence scores are essential to build trustworthy systems . |
| Approach: | They propose a Reasoning Model Confidence estimation benchmark to assess LRM confidence . the benchmark is constructed from 347,496 reasoning traces from six popular LRMs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compares ten different representation-based methods on a wide range of architectures. |
Benchmarking Large Language Models on CFLUE - A Chinese Financial Language Understanding Evaluation Dataset (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have revolutionized natural language processing (NLP) there is an urgent need for new benchmarks to keep pace with the development of LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess the capability of large language models (LLMs) they use a dataset to provide both knowledge assessment and application assessment . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark provides datasets tailored for knowledge assessment and application assessment. |
AlgBench: To What Extent Do Large Reasoning Models Understand Algorithms? (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for algorithmic reasoning fail to answer a critical question: do LRMs master algorithmic thinking? Empirical evaluations on leading LRM models reveal substantial performance heterogeneity, while models perform well on non-optimized tasks, accuracy drops sharply to around 49% on globally optimized algorithms. |
| Approach: | They propose an algorithm-centric benchmark that evaluates large reasoning models under an algorithmic paradigm. |
| Outcome: | Empirical evaluations on leading LRMs reveal substantial performance heterogeneity . models perform well on non-optimized tasks, accuracy drops sharply to around 49% . |
Are Large Language Models Reliable Reviewers? A Benchmark for Error Detection in Financial Documents (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Ying He, Zhouhong Gu, Zhecheng Hu, Yubo Zhou, Hao Shen, Jiaqing Liang, Zhaoqian Dai, Ma Shuguang, Fei Yu, Yanghua Xiao, Zhixu Li
| Challenge: | Existing LLMs struggle to identify errors in financial documents, a study shows . 18% of financial practitioners make errors daily, one-third make errors several times weekly, and 59% make errors multiple times monthly. |
| Approach: | They introduce FinED-Bench, a publicly available Benchmark for financial error detection . it covers nine real-world financial scenarios and includes over 900 documents in 2025 . supervised fine-tuning can significantly improve the performance of weaker LLMs, they show . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers nine real-world financial scenarios and includes over 900 documents reported in 2025 that are unseen by existing language models. |
CFinBench: A Comprehensive Chinese Financial Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ying Nie, Binwei Yan, Tianyu Guo, Hao Liu, Haoyu Wang, Wei He, Binfan Zheng, Weihao Wang, Qiang Li, Weijian Sun, Yunhe Wang, Dacheng Tao
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on various NLP tasks, yet their potential in more challenging task like finance, has not been fully explored. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess the financial knowledge of large language models (LLMs) in China. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark is the most comprehensive evaluation benchmark to date for LLMs in finance. |
FinMaster: A Holistic Benchmark for Full-Pipeline Financial Management with Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Junzhe Jiang, Chang Yang, Aixin Cui, Sihan Jin, Yujing Zhang, Yilin Xiao, Ruiyu Wang, Bo Li, Xiao Huang, Danny Dongning Sun, Xinrun Wang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks lack domain-specific data, realistic workflow-level task design, and standardized workflow- level evaluation. |
| Approach: | a new benchmark evaluates large language models on financial management workflows . the global financial services market is projected to grow to $37 trillion by 2027 . |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark for large language models on financial management workflows reveals critical capability gaps . accuracy drops from 90% on basic tasks to 40% on complex scenarios requiring multi-step reasoning . the global financial services market reached $25.8 trillion in 2022 and is projected to grow to $37 trillion by 2027 . |