Challenge: Recent studies have introduced eclectic strategies to enhance MLLMs’ reasoning capabilities, but they remain related to a single language.
Approach: They propose a modular approach that instructs models to abstract key elements of the reasoning process and refine reasoning trajectories via self-correction.
Outcome: The proposed approach improves multimodal reasoning, gets aligned performances among the languages approaching strong models and improves the model's performance.

Similar Papers

Multilingual Reasoning via Self-training (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have introduced eclectic strategies to improve reasoning beyond English, but these methods are related to specific language that is not always optimal for reasoning.
Approach: They propose a modular approach that instructs models to structure reasoning passages in a different problem space and then self-refines their capabilities to deliver step-wise reasoning passage.
Outcome: The proposed approach achieves significant improvements in multilingual reasoning of various models and task, with improved reasoning consistency across languages.
Unlocking Multilingual Reasoning Capability of LLMs and LVLMs through Representation Engineering (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to enhance multilingual reasoning capabilities rely on costly multilingual training or employ prompting with external translation tools.
Approach: They propose a training-free inference-time method to enhance multilingual reasoning capabilities via Representation Engineering without additional training data or tools.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms existing methods on four reasoning benchmarks in English and Thai and Swahili.
LM2: A Simple Society of Language Models Solves Complex Reasoning (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies show that providing guidance via decomposing the original question into multiple subproblems elicits more robustness in LLM reasoning.
Approach: They propose a language-based decomposition, solution and verification framework that modularizes the decomposer, solution, and verification into three different language models.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms existing methods on in- and out-domain reasoning problems, outperforming the best baselines by 8.1% on MATH, 7.71% on JEEBench, and 9.7% on MedQA problems.
Demystifying Multilingual Reasoning in Process Reward Modeling (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a recent study focuses on the use of large language models to solve multi-step reasoning tasks.
Approach: They propose to extend large language models to multilingual settings by extending process reward models to English . they train multilingual PRMs on a dataset spanning seven languages, which is translated from english .
Outcome: The proposed model improves accuracy and reduces early-stage reasoning errors.
Vision-Language Models Can Self-Improve Reasoning via Reflection (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Chain-of-thought (CoT) has been shown to improve the reasoning capability of large language models (LLMs).
Approach: They propose a framework which iteratively enhances the model’s Vision-language Reasoning by Reflecting on CoT Rationales.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves multimodal reasoning on vision-language tasks by 23% to 60% over baselines.
MAmmoTH-VL: Eliciting Multimodal Reasoning with Instruction Tuning at Scale (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current instruction-tuning datasets focus on simplistic visual question answering tasks, and provide phrase-level answers without any intermediate rationales.
Approach: They propose to use open-source multimodal large language models to train MLLMs on a dataset with 12M instruction-response pairs to elicit CoT reasoning.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art performance on benchmarks such as MathVerse, MMMU-Pro, and MuirBench, and gains improvements of up to 4% on non-reasoning-based benchmarks.
LLM2: Let Large Language Models Harness System 2 Reasoning (2025.naacl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Empirical results on mathematical reasoning benchmarks substantiate the efficacy of Large language models (LLMs).
Approach: They propose a framework that combines an LLM with a process-based verifier to generate plausible candidates and provide timely process-driven feedback to distinguish desirable and undesirable outputs.
Outcome: Empirical results show that LLM2 improves accuracy on GSM8K and self-consistency increases major@20 accuracy.
MAF: Multi-Aspect Feedback for Improving Reasoning in Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to enhance Language Models fail to address diverse error types . generic feedback is a bottleneck for addressing diverse errors in reasoning chains .
Approach: They propose an iterative refinement framework that integrates multiple feedback modules . they propose to address errors in reasoning chains by integrating frozen LMs with external tools .
Outcome: The proposed framework improves performance in Mathematical Reasoning and Logical Entailment by 20% and 18% respectively.
AutoRubric: Rubric-Based Generative Rewards for Faithful Multimodal Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have advanced from perception tasks to complex multi-step reasoning.
Approach: They propose a framework that integrates reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards with process-level supervision through automatically collected rubric-based generative rewards.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on six multimodal reasoning benchmarks and significantly improves reasoning faithfulness in dedicated evaluations.
Think Natively: Unlocking Multilingual Reasoning with Consistency-Enhanced Reinforcement Learning (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current Large Reasoning Models exhibit two critical limitations when processing non-English languages: (1) They struggle to maintain input-output language consistency; (2) They generally perform poorly with wrong reasoning paths and lower answer accuracy compared to English.
Approach: They propose a language-consistency reward and a cross-lingual thinking alignment reward to improve the model's interpretability and accuracy.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves nearly 100% language consistency and superior performance on two multilingual benchmarks (MMATH and PolyMath).

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations