From Perceptions to Decisions: Wildfire Evacuation Decision Prediction with Behavioral Theory-informed LLMs (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing statistical methods for evacuation decision prediction fail to capture complex and diverse behavioral logic of different individuals. |
| Approach: | They propose a Large Language Model (LLM)-based framework that integrates behavioral theories and models to streamline the Chain-of-Thought reasoning and integrates with memory-based Reinforcement Learning module to provide accurate evacuation decision prediction and understanding. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves on three post-wildfire survey datasets with strong cross-event generalizability over existing models. |
Similar Papers
PychoAgent: Psychology-driven LLM Agents for Explainable Panic Prediction on Social Media during Sudden Disaster Events (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Mengzhu Liu, Zhengqiu Zhu, Chuan Ai, Chen Gao, Xinghong Li, Lingnan He, Kaisheng Lai, Yingfeng Chen, Xin Lu, Yong Li, Quanjun Yin
| Challenge: | Social media's rich information content and spatiotemporal granularity provide unique opportunities for emotion prediction and management. |
| Approach: | They propose a Psychology-driven generative Agent framework for explainable panic prediction based on emotion arousal theory. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves panic emotion prediction performance by 13% to 21% compared to baseline models. |
Can Large Language Models Infer Human Actions and Motives? Evaluation in Social Prediction and Inspection Games (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Game theory provides a framework for studying human behaviors through incentivized games that simulate social situations. |
| Approach: | They used two validated games from the cognitive science literature to study how well several recent open- and closed-source LLMs predict player actions with underlying human motives. |
| Outcome: | The results show that state-of-the-art LLMs can achieve accuracy close to human levels in predicting players’ actions with underlying human motives in SPGs, but failed to recognize statistical patterns in players’ action. |
Beyond Inherent Cognition Biases in LLM-Based Event Forecasting: A Multi-Cognition Agentic Framework (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models exhibit human-like cognitive biases in event forecasting . a human-curated dataset reveals significant cognitive bias in LLMs . |
| Approach: | They propose a human-curated dataset to explore LLMs' cognitive biases . they leverage LLM participants to act as multi-cognition event participants . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework alleviates cognitive biases in LLMs and offers diverse perspectives. |
Investigating Human and LLMs’ Decisions in Unverifiable Environments: A Case Study with GitHub Activity Overview (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | examining the behaviors of Large Language Models as artificial social actors is underexplored, especially in unverifiable scenarios where conventional benchmarking has little to help improve their abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to collect, compare, and reason about human and LLMs' decisions in an unverifiable scenario and use it to examine their behaviors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method compared human and LLM decisions in an unverifiable scenario on GitHub and found that proprietary LLMs behave more like humans than open-source LLM systems. |
A Unified View on Emotion Representation in Large Language Models (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show the presence of emotion concepts in the hidden state representations, but it’s unclear if the model has a robust representation consistent across different datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose a unified view to understand emotion representation in Large Language Models by experimenting with diverse datasets and prompts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be interchanged between datasets with minimal impact on performance. |
LLMs as World Models: Data-Driven and Human-Centered Pre-Event Simulation for Disaster Impact Assessment (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) show promise in simulating complex scenarios. |
| Approach: | They examine multiple LLMs to proactively estimate perceived earthquake impacts using multimodal datasets and multimodal imagery. |
| Outcome: | The framework generates Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) predictions at zip code and county scales using multimodal datasets. |
Can Large Language Models Effectively Support Decision-Making in Sudden Emergencies? (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research has focused on the earlier stages of emergency response . lack of suitable datasets for reliable and compliance-aware decision-oriented modeling and evaluation is limiting current research . |
| Approach: | They propose a first real-world emergency decision-making dataset EDM-Bench . they propose 'rule-enhanced reasoning framework' that integrates external regulatory knowledge with constrained inference mechanisms to improve both decision safety and interpretability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves decision safety and interpretability by integrating regulatory knowledge with constrained inference mechanisms. |
Will LLMs Sink or Swim? Exploring Decision-Making Under Pressure (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown their ability to simulate human-like decision-making, yet the impact of psychological pressures on their decision- making processes remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They used explicit and implicit pressure prompts to induce specific pressures and tested them on reasoning, psychometric, and game theory tasks. |
| Outcome: | The results show that pressures significantly affect LLMs’ decision-making, varying across tasks and models. |
Current Advances in LLM Reasoning (2026.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial examines comprehensive evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) advanced inference time methods and post-training methods that aim to make LLMs think more like humans are discussed in this tutorial. |
| Approach: | This tutorial explores comprehensive evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) and discusses two types of methods to improve models’ reasoning: advanced inference time methods, structured and self-improvement inference methods, and post-training methods, such as RLHF, DPO, and GRPO. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial examines evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models and discusses two types of methods to improve models’ reasoning. |
Surge: On the Potential of Large Language Models as General-Purpose Surrogate Code Executors (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural surrogate models are powerful tools in data mining, but are underexplored . large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in code-related tasks . |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmarking framework to examine the feasibility of large language models . they examine scaling laws, data efficiency, and predictive accuracy of 21 open-source and proprietary LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark examines 21 open-source and proprietary LLMs . it also examines scaling laws, data efficiency, and predictive accuracy . |