Sumanth Doddapaneni, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Dilip Venkatesh, Raj Dabre, Anoop Kunchukuttan, Mitesh M Khapra
| Challenge: | Evaluating machine-generated text remains a challenge in NLP for non-English languages . current evaluation frameworks focus on English, revealing a gap in multilingual evaluations . |
| Approach: | They propose a cross-lingual auto evaluation framework that includes evaluator LLMs and a test set specifically designed for multilingual evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model aligns more closely with human judgments than proprietary models on non-English language evaluations. |
Similar Papers
Are Large Language Model-based Evaluators the Solution to Scaling Up Multilingual Evaluation? (2024.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
Rishav Hada, Varun Gumma, Adrian Wynter, Harshita Diddee, Mohamed Ahmed, Monojit Choudhury, Kalika Bali, Sunayana Sitaram
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various tasks, but their evaluation, especially in languages beyond the top 20, remains inadequate due to existing benchmarks and metrics limitations. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Large Language Models as evaluators to rank or score other models’ outputs by calibrating them against 20K human judgments across three text-generation tasks, five metrics, and eight languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation methods can be used to improve multilingual evaluation by calibrating them against 20K human judgments across three text-generation tasks, five metrics, and eight languages. |
Cross-lingual Evaluation of Multilingual Text Generation (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for multilingual text generation are limited by language and data leakage. |
| Approach: | They propose an annotation-free cross-lingual evaluation protocol for multilingual text generation . they first generate English references from the translated non-English inputs into English . |
| Outcome: | The proposed protocol shows a high correlation to the reference-based ROUGE metric in four languages on news text summarization. |
MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Weihao Xuan, Rui Yang, Heli Qi, Qingcheng Zeng, Yunze Xiao, Aosong Feng, Dairui Liu, Yun Xing, Junjue Wang, Fan Gao, Jinghui Lu, Yuang Jiang, Huitao Li, Xin Li, Kunyu Yu, Ruihai Dong, Shangding Gu, Yuekang Li, Xiaofei Xie, Felix Juefei-Xu, Foutse Khomh, Osamu Yoshie, Qingyu Chen, Douglas Teodoro, Nan Liu, Randy Goebel, Lei Ma, Edison Marrese-Taylor, Shijian Lu, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo, Irene Li
| Challenge: | Existing large language model evaluation benchmarks focus on English, while current multilingual tasks lack parallel questions that specifically assess cross-lingual reasoning abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a comprehensive benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark. |
| Outcome: | The MMLU-ProX is a comprehensive benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark. |
Disentangling Language and Culture for Evaluating Multilingual Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Extensive evaluations of large language models (LLMs) are conducted on a wide range of models, revealing a notable cultural-linguistic synergy phenomenon, where models exhibit better performance when questions are culturally aligned with the language. |
| Approach: | They propose a Dual Evaluation Framework to comprehensively assess the multilingual capabilities of large language models by decomposing evaluation along dimensions of linguistic medium and cultural context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework allows for a nuanced analysis of LLMs’ ability to process questions within both native and cross-cultural contexts cross-lingually. |
METAL: Towards Multilingual Meta-Evaluation (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that Large Language Models excel on many standard NLP benchmarks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for end-to-end evaluation of Large Language Models as evaluators in multilingual scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates LLMs as evaluators in multilingual scenarios. |
Learning to Judge: LLMs Designing and Applying Evaluation Rubrics (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models are increasingly used as evaluators for natural language generation . human rubrics are often static and misaligned with how models internally represent language quality. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to generate interpretable and task-aware evaluation dimensions and apply them within models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves the semantic coherence and scoring reliability of LLM-defined criteria and their alignment with human criteria. |
BenchMAX: A Comprehensive Multilingual Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multilingual benchmarks focus primarily on language understanding tasks. |
| Approach: | They develop a multi-way multilingual benchmark that measures critical capabilities of large language models across languages. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on BenchMAX reveal uneven utilization of core capabilities across languages, emphasizing the performance gaps that scaling model size alone does not resolve. |
Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challenges (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | introducing Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened new avenues for assessing generated content quality, e.g., coherence, creativity, and context relevance. |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy for organizing existing LLM-based evaluation metrics and a structured framework to understand and compare them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy offers a framework to understand and compare LLM-based evaluation methods. |
LLM Evaluate: An Industry-Focused Evaluation Tool for Large Language Models (2025.coling-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability to solve a wide range of tasks in recent years. |
| Approach: | They propose to build an on-premise system for LLM evaluation to address the challenges in the evaluation of LLMs in real-world industrial settings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation system protects customer privacy and protects data integrity in real-world industrial environments. |
Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations? (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Human evaluation is indispensable for assessing the quality of texts generated by machine learning models or written by humans. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to evaluate unseen texts using the same instructions and samples . they also use LLMs to generate responses to questions that are used to conduct human evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to evaluate texts in open-ended story generation and adversarial attacks. |