Challenge: Existing approaches to negotiation dialogue focus on only one aspect, ignoring the synergistic effect of their combined synergies.
Approach: They propose a dual-mind negotiation agent framework that integrates an intuitive and a deliberative module for slow, expression optimization.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art on negotiation datasets showing that it improves negotiation ability.

Similar Papers

ASTRA: A Negotiation Agent with Adaptive and Strategic Reasoning via Tool-integrated Action for Dynamic Offer Optimization (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing agents struggle due to bounded rationality in human data, low adaptability to counterpart behavior, and limited strategic reasoning.
Approach: They propose a framework for turn-level offer optimization based on two core principles: opponent modeling and Tit-for-Tat reciprocity.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms baselines across diverse partner agents and validates through human evaluation.
Planning Like Human: A Dual-process Framework for Dialogue Planning (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) operate in a reactive mode, often resulting in efficiency issues or suboptimal performance.
Approach: They propose a dual-process dialogue planning framework that leverages the dual-process theory of human cognition and a deliberative Monte Carlo Tree Search mechanism to emulate human-like conversational dynamics.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms existing methods in achieving high-quality dialogues and operational efficiency.
MA2P: A Meta-Cognitive Autonomous Intelligent Agents Framework for Complex Persuasion (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to persuasion generate generic or weakly grounded responses even when such cues are identified.
Approach: They propose a meta-cognitive autonomous intelligent agent framework for complex persuasion that coordinates perception management, mental-state inference, strategy execution, memory maintenance, and performance evaluation.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves a higher persuasion success rate than baselines.
Leveraging Dual Process Theory in Language Agent Framework for Real-time Simultaneous Human-AI Collaboration (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) excel in turn-by-turn human-AI collaboration but struggle with simultaneous tasks requiring real-time interaction.
Approach: They propose a language agent framework that integrates *System 1* and *System 2* for efficient real-time simultaneous human-AI collaboration.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves on existing LLM-based agents and human collaborators by integrating Theory of Mind and asynchronous reflection to infer human intentions and perform reasoning-based autonomous decisions.
PRISMA: Preference-Reinforced Self-Training Approach for Interpretable Emotionally Intelligent Negotiation Dialogues (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Emotion plays a pivotal role in shaping negotiation outcomes, influencing trust, cooperation, and long-term relationships.
Approach: They propose an Emotion-aware Negotiation Strategy-informed Chain-of-Thought reasoning mechanism which mimics human negotiation by perceiving, understanding, using, and managing emotions.
Outcome: The proposed system generates interpretable emotions and improves negotiation effectiveness on job interviews and resource allocation datasets.
Improving Dialog Systems for Negotiation with Personality Modeling (2021.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: In this paper, we introduce a framework for generating strategic dialog inspired by the idea of incorporating a theory of mind (ToM) into machines.
Approach: They propose a probabilistic formulation to encapsulate the opponent's personality type during both learning and inference.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves 20% higher dialog agreement rate compared to baselines on a mixed population of opponents.
KAPA: A Deliberative Agent Framework with Tree-Structured Knowledge Base for Multi-Domain User Intent Understanding (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on the use of LLMs for estimating user intents are either too far from real human thought processes or require labeled samples.
Approach: They propose a deliberative agent framework that leverages human thought process to build high-level domain knowledge and a tree-structured knowledge base to store refined experience and data.
Outcome: The proposed framework is able to build high-level domain knowledge and efficiently store it across multiple steps.
Are LLMs Effective Negotiators? Systematic Evaluation of the Multifaceted Capabilities of LLMs in Negotiation Dialogues (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being utilized as AI negotiation agents . however, prior research on LLMs lacks a systematic evaluation of their diverse capabilities in negotiation.
Approach: They propose to analyze the multifaceted capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse dialogue scenarios throughout the stages of a typical negotiation interaction.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms GPT-4 in many negotiation tasks while identifying specific challenges, such as making subjective assessments and generating contextually appropriate, strategically advantageous responses.
INA: An Integrative Approach for Enhancing Negotiation Strategies with Reward-Based Dialogue Agent (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a novel negotiation agent is designed for the online marketplace . a dialogue agent can negotiate on price and other factors .
Approach: They propose a novel negotiation agent that is integrative in nature and can negotiate on price and other factors.
Outcome: The proposed agent is integrative in nature and can negotiate on price and other factors.
EmoMAS: Emotion-Aware Multi-Agent System for High-Stakes Edge-Deployable Negotiation with Bayesian Orchestration (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for automated negotiation, but their cloud-centric paradigm exposes sensitive negotiations to privacy and security risks.
Approach: They propose a Bayesian multi-agent framework that transforms emotional decision-making from reactive to strategic.
Outcome: EmoMAS leverages a Bayesian orchestrator to coordinate three specialized agents: game-theoretic, reinforcement learning, and psychological coherence models.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations