Challenge: Recent advances in Chain-of-Thought prompting have facilitated significant breakthroughs for Large Language Models (LLMs) in complex reasoning tasks.
Approach: They propose a hierarchical reasoning aggregation framework to address this problem . they propose dynamic sampling to adjust the number of reasoning chains .
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms existing ensemble methods on complex reasoning tasks.

Similar Papers

Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Reasoning is a fundamental aspect of human intelligence that plays a crucial role in many intellectual activities.
Approach: They propose to improve LLMs' ability to elicit reasoning by providing exemplars or prompts to model reasoning.
Outcome: This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the state of knowledge on reasoning in large language models.
LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work investigating the logical reasoning ability of large language models has focused only on a couple of inference rules of propositional and first-order logics.
Approach: They propose to use a natural language question-answering dataset to evaluate the logical reasoning ability of large language models.
Outcome: The proposed model performs poorly on a range of natural language questions using chain-of-thought prompting.
Self-Reasoning Language Models: Unfold Hidden Reasoning Chains with Few Reasoning Catalyst (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have demonstrated that inference-time scaling increases performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in various reasoning tasks such as mathematics and complex question answering by increasing the length of Chain-of-Thought (CoT).
Approach: They propose a model which synthesizes longer CoT data and iteratively improves performance through self-training by incorporating a few demonstration examples.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves an average improvement of more than +2.5 points across five reasoning tasks: MMLU, GSM8K, ARC-C, HellaSwag, and BBH on two backbone models.
Getting MoRE out of Mixture of Language Model Reasoning Experts (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing large language models (LLMs) have poor generalizability on question types beyond those seen in the prompt.
Approach: They propose a framework that integrates specialized language models to generalize across question types that require distinct reasoning abilities.
Outcome: The proposed framework gives higher accuracy than any single specialized model on a collection of 12 QA datasets from four reasoning types.
A Survey of Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Progress and Challenges (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval (RIR) targets retrieval settings where relevance is mediated by latent inferential links between a query and supporting evidence, rather than semantic similarity.
Approach: They propose a taxonomy that categorizes methods based on where and how reasoning is integrated into the retrieval pipeline.
Outcome: The proposed method framework provides a detailed analysis of the current landscape and its trade-offs and practical applications.
CER: Confidence Enhanced Reasoning in LLMs (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to enhance the reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs) in complex reasoning tasks are limited by their limitations.
Approach: They propose an uncertainty-aware framework to enhance the reliability of Large Language Models . they quantify the confidence of intermediate answers and evaluate the reliability based on these confidences a way that reflects the reliability.
Outcome: The proposed approach improves accuracy of large language models in math and open-domain tasks by 7.4% and 5.8% over baseline approaches.
The Best of Both Worlds: Combining Parallel and Sequential Inference Scaling via Aggregation Fine-Tuning (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Empirical results show that AFT-trained models achieve substantial gains with test-time scaling.
Approach: They introduce a supervised fine-tuning paradigm where models synthesize multiple draft responses into a single, refined answer.
Outcome: Empirical results show that AFT-trained models outperform baseline models while eliminating external guidance.
DIVKNOWQA: Assessing the Reasoning Ability of LLMs via Open-Domain Question Answering over Knowledge Base and Text (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Retrievalaugmented LLMs have been used to ground LLM in external knowledge . a gap exists in the current landscape regarding the effectiveness of grounding LLM on heterogeneous knowledge sources.
Approach: They propose a model that uses symbolic language to generate symbolic queries . they use a dataset that is generated using predefined reasoning chains and human annotation .
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms previous approaches by a significant margin in QA tasks over text.
1+1>2: Can Large Language Models Serve as Cross-Lingual Knowledge Aggregators? (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have been recognized for their impressive capabilities in natural language processing (NLP).
Approach: They propose a method to enhance the multilingual performance of Large Language Models by aggregating knowledge from diverse languages.
Outcome: The proposed method reduces the performance disparity across languages and offers valuable insights for further exploration.
Format-Adapter: Improving Reasoning Capability of LLMs by Adapting Suitable Format (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Prior work showed that multiple reasoning formats outperform a single format when generating multiple answers.
Approach: They propose a method to measure reasoning error when generating multiple answers . they propose 'formatadapter' which generates and selects suitable reasoning formats .
Outcome: The proposed method achieves a 4.3% performance improvement over previous works on math and commonsense reasoning tasks.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations