AntCritic: Argument Mining for Free-Form and Visually-Rich Financial Comments (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument mining is a thriving task in natural language processing, but its generalization is limited by existing datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a dataset to help model argument mining . the dataset AntCritic supports both argument component detection and argument relation prediction tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can detect arguments and identify their relationships automatically. |
Similar Papers
Towards Comprehensive Argument Analysis in Education: Dataset, Tasks, and Method (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research on argument mining has proposed various argument annotation schemes and tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework comprising 14 fine-grained relation types to capture the interplay between argument components for a thorough understanding of argument structure. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework captures the interplay between argument components for a thorough understanding of argument structure. |
Can Large Language Models perform Relation-based Argument Mining? (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for RbAM fail to perform satisfactorily across different datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose to use relation-based argument mining to determine agreement (support) and disagreement (attack) relations amongst textual arguments in binary and ternary settings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms the best performing (RoBERTa-based) baseline on two open-source LLMs and with GPT-3.5-turbo on several datasets for (binary and ternary) RbAM. |
IAM: A Comprehensive and Large-Scale Dataset for Integrated Argument Mining Tasks (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument mining (AM) is a computational process that is used to analyze information in a debating system. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a large dataset to automate the manual process of debating . they propose to integrate claim extraction, stance classification and evidence extraction tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed tasks can extract claims, stances, evidence and more from a large dataset . the proposed tasks are highly efficient and can be applied to argument mining tasks . |
TARGER: Neural Argument Mining at Your Fingertips (P19-3)
Copied to clipboard
Artem Chernodub, Oleksiy Oliynyk, Philipp Heidenreich, Alexander Bondarenko, Matthias Hagen, Chris Biemann, Alexander Panchenko
| Challenge: | Argumentation is a multi-disciplinary field that extends from philosophy and psychology to linguistics as well as to artificial intelligence. |
| Approach: | They propose to use TARGER to tagging arguments in free text and keyword-based retrieval of arguments from a web-scale corpus. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can be used without any reproducibility effort on the user's side and is easily portable to other domains and use cases. |
Learning Strategies for Robust Argument Mining: An Analysis of Variations in Language and Domain (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument mining is a complex process that requires a large amount of resources and time. |
| Approach: | They propose to analyze arguments in three different languages and domains to understand their robustness to natural language variations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed systems are more robust to natural language variations than existing arguments mining systems. |
Yes, we can! Mining Arguments in 50 Years of US Presidential Campaign Debates (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Political debates are a natural application scenario for Argument Mining. |
| Approach: | They propose an argument mining approach to political debates that uses argument components to annotate 39 political debate from the last 50 years of US presidential campaigns. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms baselines in argument mining over political debates. |
Argument Mining with Fine-Tuned Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument Mining (AM) pipelines use fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) . initial approaches employ supervised machine learning algorithms, such as Maximum Entropy classifiers and Logistic Regressions. |
| Approach: | They propose to model the three main AM sub-tasks as text generation tasks and fine-tune eight popular quantized and non-quantized large language models (LLMs) on the benchmark PE, AbstRCT, and CDCP datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline achieves state-of-the-art across all AM sub-tasks and datasets, showing significant improvements over previous benchmarks. |
On the Role of Key Phrases in Argument Mining (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to argument mining often overlook crucial conceptual links between ACs and ARs. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that extracts key phrases from AM benchmarks using an open-source Large Language Model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses baselines on three structurally distinct AM benchmarks by up to 9.5% F1 score, demonstrating its strong potential. |
AMPERSAND: Argument Mining for PERSuAsive oNline Discussions (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument mining is a field of corpus-based discourse analysis that involves the automatic identification of argumentative structures in text. |
| Approach: | They propose a computational model for argument mining in online persuasive discussion forums that brings together the micro-level (argument as product) and macro-level models of argumentation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on existing models using pointer networks and a pre-trained language model. |
CU-MAM: Coherence-Driven Unified Macro-Structures for Argument Mining (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument Mining (AM) involves the automatic identification of argument structure in natural language. |
| Approach: | They propose an approach that captures local and global coherence to identify argument structures by modeling macro-structure. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach shows superior performance on heterogeneous datasets and on unseen datasets. |