Not Everything is All You Need: Toward Low-Redundant Optimization for Large Language Model Alignment (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that large language models are struggling to align with human preference in complex tasks and scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a low-redundant alignment method that selects the top-10% most updated parameters in LLMs for alignment training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves on 10 datasets and shows that it is redundant . it can be used to train LLMs on QA and ECQA datasets, but it is not feasible to test it on a large dataset. |
Similar Papers
A Survey on Training-free Alignment of Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Birong Pan, Yongqi Li, Weiyu Zhang, Wenpeng Lu, Mayi Xu, Shen Zhou, Yuanyuan Zhu, Ming Zhong, Tieyun Qian
| Challenge: | a survey of large language models (LLMs) aims to ensure outputs adhere to human values, ethical standards, and legal norms. |
| Approach: | They present the first systematic review of TF alignment methods . they categorize them by stages of pre-decoding, in-decoder and post-decoration . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are based on training-free (TF) alignment techniques . they are able to be used in open-source and closed-source environments without retraining . |
Black-Box Prompt Optimization: Aligning Large Language Models without Model Training (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models are often not well aligned with human intents, which requires additional training. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Black-Box Prompt Optimization (BPO) to perform alignments on large language models that are not well aligned with human intents. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models and is model-agnostic. |
Inverse Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Model Alignment (2025.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial will provide a comprehensive review of recent advances in LLM alignment . it will highlight the necessity of constructing neural reward models from human data . |
| Approach: | This tutorial will provide a comprehensive review of recent advances in LLM alignment through the lens of inverse reinforcement learning. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial will provide a comprehensive review of recent advances in LLM alignment through the lens of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL). |
Aligners: Decoupling LLMs and Alignment (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) need to be aligned with human expectations to ensure their safety and utility in most applications. |
| Approach: | They propose to decouple LLMs and alignment by training *aligner* models that can be used to align any LLM on an as-needed basis. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to align any LLM for a given criteria on an as-needed basis. |
It’s All About In-Context Learning! Teaching Extremely Low-Resource Languages to LLMs (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Low-resource languages, especially those written in rare scripts, remain unsupported by large language models due to lack of training data. |
| Approach: | They evaluate 20 under-represented languages across three state-of-the-art multilingual LLMs and compare their methods to parameter-efficient fine-tuning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods compare with parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) on low-resource languages. |
Comparing Bad Apples to Good Oranges Aligning Large Language Models via Joint Preference Optimization (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that acquiring human preferences by comparing generations is not effective for large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a preference optimization objective that elicits preferences jointly over the instruction-response pairs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms prior preference optimizations by 5.2% and 3.3% in summarization and open-ended dialogue datasets. |
AutoAlign: Get Your LLM Aligned with Minimal Annotations (2025.acl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
Xinyu Lu, Dong Xu, Chunkang Zhang, Xinyan Guan, Junxiang Wang, Qingyu Zhang, Pengbo Wang, Yingzhi Mao, Hao Xiang, Xueru Wen, Zichao Li, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Le Sun, Xianpei Han
| Challenge: | Automated Alignment (ALM) is a set of algorithms designed to align Large Language Models (LLMs) with human intentions and values while minimizing manual intervention. |
| Approach: | They propose an open-source toolkit that integrates mainstream automated algorithms through a consistent interface and an accessible workflow supporting one-click execution for prompt synthesis and automatic alignment signal construction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enables easy reproduction of existing results through extensive benchmarks and facilitates the development of novel approaches via modular components. |
A Deep Dive into the Trade-Offs of Parameter-Efficient Preference Alignment Techniques (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models are pre-trained on trillions of tokens and instruction-tuned or aligned to specific preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose guidelines to help researchers perform more effective parameter-efficient LLM alignment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform preference optimization and outperformed pre-trained models on three key axes. |
Adversarial Preference Optimization: Enhancing Your Alignment via RM-LLM Game (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for training large language models require additional annotations to adjust to shifted distributions. |
| Approach: | They propose an algorithm that allows LLMs and reward models to update alternatively via a min-max game to improve their alignment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves existing alignment baselines in terms of LLM helpfulness and harmlessness. |
From Distributional to Overton Pluralism: Investigating Large Language Model Alignment (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a large language model's (LLM) output distribution is changed by an alignment process . a recent study shows that aligned models surface information that cannot be recovered from base models without fine-tuning. |
| Approach: | They analyze two aspects of the alignment process that change output distributions . they find alignment suppresses irrelevant and unhelpful content . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be imitated without fine-tuning by using in-context examples and lower-resolution semantic hints about response content. |