AppBench: Planning of Multiple APIs from Various APPs for Complex User Instruction (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) still cannot perform well in this situation even with the help of in-context learning and finetuning. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLMs’ ability to plan and execute multiple APIs from various sources in order to complete the user’s task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that the existing state-of-the-art LLMs still cannot perform well in this situation even with in-context learning and finetuning. |
Similar Papers
EIFBENCH: Extremely Complex Instruction Following Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focusing on single-task environments with limited constraints lack the complexity required to fully reflect the evolution of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose to use a Segment Policy Optimization algorithm to enhance the LLM's ability to accurately fulfill multi-task workflows. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that existing benchmarks lack the complexity required to fully reflect the evolution of large language models. |
CFBench: A Comprehensive Constraints-Following Benchmark for LLMs (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Tao Zhang, ChengLIn Zhu, Yanjun Shen, Wenjing Luo, Yan Zhang, Hao Liang, Tao Zhang, Fan Yang, Mingan Lin, Yujing Qiao, Weipeng Chen, Bin Cui, Wentao Zhang, Zenan Zhou
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of Large Language Models (LLMs) focus on fragmented constraints or narrow scenarios, but they overlook the comprehensiveness and authenticity of constraints from the user’s perspective. |
| Approach: | They propose a Chinese Comprehensive Constraints Following Benchmark for LLMs that compiles constraints from real-world instructions and constructs a systematic framework for constraint types. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework integrates multi-dimensional assessment criteria with requirement prioritization, covering various perspectives of constraints, instructions, and requirement fulfillment. |
ACEBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Tool Usage (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Chen Chen, Xinlong Hao, Weiwen Liu, Xu Huang, Xingshan Zeng, Shuai Yu, Dexun Li, Yuefeng Huang, Xiangcheng Liu, Wang Xinzhi, Wu Liu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs’ tool usage face several limitations: limited evaluation scenarios, lacking assessments in real multi-turn dialogue contexts; narrow evaluation dimensions, with insufficient detailed assessments of how LLM use tools; and reliance on LLM or real API executions for evaluation, which introduces significant overhead. |
| Approach: | ACEBench is a benchmark for evaluating tool usage in Large Language Models . it categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
| Outcome: | ACEBench categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
PlanningArena: A Modular Benchmark for Multidimensional Evaluation of Planning and Tool Learning (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that LLMs can be significantly improved by integrating external tools. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that integrates external tools into large language models to evaluate their ability to generate action plans. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates the ability of large language models to generate action plans and generate action plan templates. |
HomeBench: Evaluating LLMs in Smart Homes with Valid and Invalid Instructions Across Single and Multiple Devices (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing state-of-the-art LLMs cannot perform well in situations where instructions are invalid or multiple devices are involved. |
| Approach: | They propose to integrate large language models into smart home assistants by enhancing their ability to accurately understand user needs and respond appropriately. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset is the first with valid and invalid instructions across devices . it achieves only 0.0% success rate in the scenario of invalid multi-device instructions . |
TRUEBench: Can LLM Response Meet Real-world Constraints as Productivity Assistant? (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks fail to evaluate large language models' instruction-following capabilities . current benchmarks lack multilinguality, implicit constraints and multi-turn dialogue . |
| Approach: | a new benchmark is designed to evaluate large language models' instruction-following capabilities . the benchmark features input prompts across 12 languages and includes inter-instance multilingual instructions . |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark for large language models (LLMs) is designed to assess their performance in real-world settings. |
LLMeBench: A Flexible Framework for Accelerating LLMs Benchmarking (2024.eacl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
Fahim Dalvi, Maram Hasanain, Sabri Boughorbel, Basel Mousi, Samir Abdaljalil, Nizi Nazar, Ahmed Abdelali, Shammur Absar Chowdhury, Hamdy Mubarak, Ahmed Ali
| Challenge: | Recent development and success of Large Language Models necessitate evaluation of their performance across diverse NLP tasks in different languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that can be customized to evaluate LLMs for any NLP task, regardless of language. |
| Outcome: | The LLMeBench framework can be customized to evaluate LLMs for any NLP task, regardless of language. |
UniToolBench: A Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs in Cross-Domain, Universal Task Automation (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks that focus on manually curated tool graphs lack scalability and diversity across domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale, cross-domain benchmark to evaluate LLMs' ability to reason over and utilize interconnected tools for automation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark incorporates automated tool graph construction by formulating link prediction as a probabilistic task, instead of relying on categorical LLM outputs. |
MuBench: Assessment of Multilingual Capabilities of Large Language Models Across 61 Languages (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation datasets lack cross-lingual alignment, leaving assessments of multilingual capabilities fragmented in both language and skill coverage. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multilingual consistency as a complementary metric to assess performance bottlenecks and guide model improvement. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model lacks cross-lingual alignment and language coverage gaps between state-of-the-art models. |
Small LLMs Are Weak Tool Learners: A Multi-LLM Agent (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing with impressive capabilities, but they lack domain specificity, real-time information and face challenges in solving specialized problems. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-LLM approach that decomposes the aforementioned capabilities into a planner, caller, and summarizer. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models by demonstrating its effectiveness and advantages in tool learning. |