FIZZ: Factual Inconsistency Detection by Zoom-in Summary and Zoom-out Document (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for evaluating factual consistency in abstractive summarization systems have significant limitations, especially on refinement and interpretability. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for detecting summary factual inconsistency based on fine-grained atomic facts decomposition and adaptive granularity expansion. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing systems on the AGGREFACT benchmark dataset and achieves state-of-the-art performance. |
Similar Papers
SummaCoz: A Dataset for Improving the Interpretability of Factual Consistency Detection for Summarization (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Summarization is an important application of Large Language Models. |
| Approach: | They integrate human-annotated and model-generated natural language explanations to elucidate how a summary deviates and becomes inconsistent with its source article. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model provides rationales for its judgments and improves its accuracy significantly. |
Interpretable Automatic Fine-grained Inconsistency Detection in Text Summarization (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing factual consistency evaluation approaches for text summarization provide binary predictions and limited insights into the weakness of summarizing systems. |
| Approach: | They propose a task of fine-grained inconsistency detection to detect inconsistent summaries . they represent facts with semantic frames extracted by semantic role labeling and highlight related semantic frames to predict inconsistance . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models and provides evidence to support or refute the summary. |
Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a weakly-supervised approach is needed to verify factual consistency . auxiliary span extraction tasks are useful for verifying factual consistent summaries . |
| Approach: | They propose a weakly-supervised approach for verifying factual consistency . they transfer the model to summaries generated by several neural models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms models trained with strong supervision on source documents and human evaluations. |
SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarization (2022.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that even state-of-the-art pre-trained language models can generate inconsistent summaries in more than 70% of all cases. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that enables NLI models to be used for inconsistency detection by segmenting documents into sentence units and aggregating scores between pairs of sentences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy of 74.4% on six large inconsistency detection datasets. |
Factual Consistency Evaluation for Text Summarization via Counterfactual Estimation (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to evaluate factual consistency in text summarization neglect the intrinsic cause of factual inconsistency or rely on auxiliary tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to evaluate the factual consistency in text summarization via counterfactual estimation, which formulates the causal relationship between source document, generated summary, and the language prior. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric improves correlation with human judgments and convenience of usage on three public abstractive text summarization datasets. |
On the Intractability to Synthesize Factual Inconsistencies in Summarization (2024.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for detecting factual inconsistencies in abstractive summarization are lacking in factual consistency detection. |
| Approach: | They propose to use real model-generated summaries with human annotations to detect factual inconsistencies. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the SOTA on CoGenSumm, FactCC, Frank, and SummEval datasets. |
Questioning the Validity of Summarization Datasets and Improving Their Factual Consistency (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization systems have a lack of a defined definition for the task . factual consistency is a key factor in summarizing, but there are still deficiencies . a new study shows that summarized summarisation models achieve improved performance . |
| Approach: | They propose a filtered summarization dataset with improved factual consistency to address this problem . they argue that the dataset should become a valid benchmark for developing and evaluating summarizing systems . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on a popular summarization dataset with improved factual consistency. |
Improving Factual Consistency in Abstractive Summarization with Sentence Structure Pruning (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
Dingxin Hu, Xuanyu Zhang, Xingyue Zhang, Yiyang Li, Dongsheng Chen, Marina Litvak, Natalia Vanetik, Qing Yang, Dongliang Xu, Yanquan Zhou, Lei Li, Yuze Li, Yingqi Zhu
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization models suffer from factual inconsistency problem . post-editing methods focus on replacing suspicious entities, failing to modify incorrect content hidden in sentence structures. |
| Approach: | They propose to use sentence pruning operation to correct possible errors . they propose to apply sentence pruning operations to the syntactic dependency tree . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves factual consistency on the FRANK dataset compared with baselines . it is model-independent and can serve as the final step in ensuring factual consistentness. |
A Tale of Evaluating Factual Consistency: Case Study on Long Document Summarization Evaluation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite the recent progress for summarization models in producing fluent summaries, they still encounter challenges when long sequences of generated texts and inputs (over thousands of words) need to be evaluated. |
| Approach: | They conduct a systematic analysis of factual-consistency evaluation systems across four long-document datasets and examine the relationship between sentence-level and summary-level model performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can achieve higher recall in error detection for older summaries, yet struggle with false positives and fine-grained error detection. |
Fine-grained Factual Consistency Assessment for Abstractive Summarization Models (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that around 30% of the summaries generated by abstractive summarization models contain factual errors. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained two-stage Fact Consistency assessment framework for summarization models that uses fine-grain consistency reasoning to find subtle clues to identify whether a model-generated summary is consistent with the original document. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves on the state-of-the-art models and distinguishes detailed differences better. |