Factual Consistency Evaluation for Text Summarization via Counterfactual Estimation (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to evaluate factual consistency in text summarization neglect the intrinsic cause of factual inconsistency or rely on auxiliary tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to evaluate the factual consistency in text summarization via counterfactual estimation, which formulates the causal relationship between source document, generated summary, and the language prior. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric improves correlation with human judgments and convenience of usage on three public abstractive text summarization datasets. |
Similar Papers
Enhancing Factual Consistency in Text Summarization via Counterfactual Debiasing (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive text summarization has produced fluent and informative outputs, but factual inconsistency is a challenge. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that mitigates the causal effects of language bias and irrelevancy bias by counterfactual estimation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baseline methods on two widely used summarization datasets. |
Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a weakly-supervised approach is needed to verify factual consistency . auxiliary span extraction tasks are useful for verifying factual consistent summaries . |
| Approach: | They propose a weakly-supervised approach for verifying factual consistency . they transfer the model to summaries generated by several neural models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms models trained with strong supervision on source documents and human evaluations. |
Multilingual Summarization with Factual Consistency Evaluation (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization models generate factually inconsistent summaries, reducing their utility for real-world applications. |
| Approach: | They propose to use data filtering and controlled generation to detect hallucinations in machine generated summaries. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models detect factual inconsistencies in machine generated summaries, but they focus on English only. |
Entity-level Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
Feng Nan, Ramesh Nallapati, Zhiguo Wang, Cicero Nogueira dos Santos, Henghui Zhu, Dejiao Zhang, Kathleen McKeown, Bing Xiang
| Challenge: | Existing models exhibit entity hallucination, generating names of entities that are not present in the source document. |
| Approach: | They propose to use entity-level factual consistency to improve model quality . they propose to filter the training data to reduce entity hallucination problem . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can reduce the entity hallucination problem by filtering the training data. |
Evaluating Factuality in Cross-lingual Summarization (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics for monolingual summarization require translation to evaluate the factuality of cross-lingual summmarization. |
| Approach: | They propose to analyze cross-lingual factuality by collecting annotations and generated summaries from models at summary level and sentence level. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset shows that over 50% of generated summaries contain factual errors with different characteristics from monolingual summarization. |
Improving Factual Consistency of Abstractive Summarization via Question Answering (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Feng Nan, Cicero Nogueira dos Santos, Henghui Zhu, Patrick Ng, Kathleen McKeown, Ramesh Nallapati, Dejiao Zhang, Zhiguo Wang, Andrew O. Arnold, Bing Xiang
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that about 30% of summaries generated by neural text summarization suffer from fact fabrication. |
| Approach: | They propose an automatic evaluation metric to measure factual consistency and a learning algorithm that maximizes the metric during model training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves factual consistency and overall quality of summarization models. |
Questioning the Validity of Summarization Datasets and Improving Their Factual Consistency (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization systems have a lack of a defined definition for the task . factual consistency is a key factor in summarizing, but there are still deficiencies . a new study shows that summarized summarisation models achieve improved performance . |
| Approach: | They propose a filtered summarization dataset with improved factual consistency to address this problem . they argue that the dataset should become a valid benchmark for developing and evaluating summarizing systems . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on a popular summarization dataset with improved factual consistency. |
TRUE: Re-evaluating Factual Consistency Evaluation (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
Or Honovich, Roee Aharoni, Jonathan Herzig, Hagai Taitelbaum, Doron Kukliansy, Vered Cohen, Thomas Scialom, Idan Szpektor, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias
| Challenge: | Grounded text generation systems often generate factual inconsistencies, hindering their real-world applicability. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to assess factual consistency metrics on standardized texts . they recommend NLI and question generation-and-answering-based methods as starting points . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is more actionable and interpretable than previous methods. |
SummaCoz: A Dataset for Improving the Interpretability of Factual Consistency Detection for Summarization (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Summarization is an important application of Large Language Models. |
| Approach: | They integrate human-annotated and model-generated natural language explanations to elucidate how a summary deviates and becomes inconsistent with its source article. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model provides rationales for its judgments and improves its accuracy significantly. |
FENICE: Factuality Evaluation of summarization based on Natural language Inference and Claim Extraction (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in text summarization have shown remarkable performance, but a significant number of summaries exhibit factual inconsistencies, such as hallucinations. |
| Approach: | They propose a factuality-oriented metric that evaluates text summarization for accuracy . they use a human annotation process to examine the accuracy of automatically generated summaries . |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric sets a new state-of-the-art on AGGREFACT, the de-facto benchmark for factuality evaluation. |