Please note that I’m just an AI: Analysis of Behavior Patterns of LLMs in (Non-)offensive Speech Identification (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming a part of our everyday lives by being used as tools for information search, content creation, writing assistance, and many more. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Large Language Models to detect offensive online language in applications with social risk, such as late-life companions and online content moderators. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models fail to detect offensive language and are therefore unsuitable for use in social applications such as late-life companions and online content moderators. |
Similar Papers
LLM generated responses to mitigate the impact of hate speech (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Jakub Podolak, Szymon Łukasik, Paweł Balawender, Jan Ossowski, Jan Piotrowski, Katarzyna Bakowicz, Piotr Sankowski
| Challenge: | a study aims to determine the effectiveness of large language models to counteract hate speech . it is the first real-life A/B test evaluating the effectiveness . |
| Approach: | They conduct the first real-life A/B test assessing the effectiveness of LLM-generated counter-speech. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system reduces user engagement by over 20%, the study shows . the proposed metric is based on a simple metric and is scalable to other platforms . |
Large Language Models for Anomaly and Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Survey (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their effectiveness in natural language processing but also in broader applications due to their advanced comprehension and generative capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy to categorize existing approaches into two classes based on the role played by LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy categorizes existing approaches into two classes based on the role played by LLMs. |
LLM Sensitivity Challenges in Abusive Language Detection: Instruction-Tuned vs. Human Feedback (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies show that instruction-tuned LLMs under-predict positive classes . however, they are overly sensitive and can be applied for abuse detection without fine-tuning . |
| Approach: | They show that instruction-tuned LLMs tend to under-predict positive classes . they also show that label frequency in the prompt helps with the significant over-prediction . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models under-predict positive classes in social media, whereas they are overly sensitive. |
Vulnerabilities of Large Language Models to Adversarial Attacks (2024.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial focuses on the vulnerabilities of Large Language Models to adversarial attacks . the tutorial lays the foundation by explaining safety-aligned models and concepts in cybersecurity . |
| Approach: | This tutorial lays the foundation by explaining safety-aligned LLMs and concepts in cybersecurity. |
| Outcome: | The tutorial lays the foundation by explaining safety-aligned models and concepts in cybersecurity. |
Don’t Go To Extremes: Revealing the Excessive Sensitivity and Calibration Limitations of LLMs in Implicit Hate Speech Detection (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Several studies have examined whether large language models exhibit bias or discrimination against individuals or groups in terms of protected attributes like race, gender, or religion. |
| Approach: | They evaluate LLMs' ability to detect implicit hate speech and express confidence in their responses by considering prompt patterns and mainstream uncertainty estimation methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models exhibit two extremes: (1) excessive sensitivity towards groups or topics that may cause fairness issues, resulting in misclassifying benign statements as hate speech; (2) confidence scores for each method excessively concentrate on a fixed range, remaining unchanged regardless of the dataset’s complexity. |
ToxiCloakCN: Evaluating Robustness of Offensive Language Detection in Chinese with Cloaking Perturbations (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing large language models struggle with systematically perturbed data designed to evade detection mechanisms. |
| Approach: | They propose a large language model with homophonic substitutions and emoji transformations to test their models' robustness against cloaking perturbations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model underperforms in detecting offensive content when perturbations are applied to Chinese language datasets. |
What Does the Bot Say? Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Social Media Bot Detection (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Social media bot detection has always been an arms race between advancements in machine learning and adversarial bot strategies to evade detection. |
| Approach: | They propose a mixture-of-heterogeneous-experts framework to divide and conquer diverse user information modalities and propose LLM-guided manipulation of user textual and structured information to evade detection. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on 1,000 annotated examples while bringing down existing detectors by 29.6% and harming calibration and reliability of bot detection systems. |
Investigating Human and LLMs’ Decisions in Unverifiable Environments: A Case Study with GitHub Activity Overview (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | examining the behaviors of Large Language Models as artificial social actors is underexplored, especially in unverifiable scenarios where conventional benchmarking has little to help improve their abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to collect, compare, and reason about human and LLMs' decisions in an unverifiable scenario and use it to examine their behaviors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method compared human and LLM decisions in an unverifiable scenario on GitHub and found that proprietary LLMs behave more like humans than open-source LLM systems. |
A Chinese Dataset for Evaluating the Safeguards in Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yuxia Wang, Zenan Zhai, Haonan Li, Xudong Han, Shom Lin, Zhenxuan Zhang, Angela Zhao, Preslav Nakov, Timothy Baldwin
| Challenge: | a recent study has shown that large language models can produce harmful responses, exposing users to unexpected risks. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset for the safety evaluation of Chinese LLMs in Mandarin Chinese . they extend the dataset to better identify false negative and false positive examples . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset is for the safety evaluation of Chinese LLMs, and is based on a Chinese dataset. |
LLMs for Low Resource Languages in Multilingual, Multimodal and Dialectal Settings (2024.eacl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in AI can be attributed to the remarkable performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) success of LLMs depends on specific training techniques, such as instruction tuning and prompting . |
| Approach: | They explore the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in various tasks and languages . they also examine their performance, fine-tuning, instructions tuning, and close vs. open models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used for speech and multimodal tasks across modalities, languages, and dialects. |