Plan-Grounded Large Language Models for Dual Goal Conversational Settings (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies show that LLMs can follow user instructions, but it is unclear how they can lead a plan-grounded conversation in mixed-initiative settings where instructions flow in both directions of the conversation. |
| Approach: | They propose a dual-purpose mixed-initiative conversational setting where the LLM grounds the conversation on an arbitrary plan and seeks to satisfy both a procedural plan and user instructions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 2.1x improvement over a strong baseline and good generalization to unseen domains. |
Similar Papers
Prompting and Evaluating Large Language Models for Proactive Dialogues: Clarification, Target-guided, and Non-collaboration (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that ChatGPT has limitations such as failing to ask clarifying questions to ambiguous queries or refusing problematic user requests. |
| Approach: | They propose a Proactive Chain-of-Thought prompting scheme which augments LLMs with the goal planning capability over descriptive reasoning chains to trigger proactivity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed scheme augments LLMs with the goal planning capability over descriptive reasoning chains to trigger the proactivity of LLM-based proactive dialogue systems. |
Show and Guide: Instructional-Plan Grounded Vision and Language Model (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing plans-following language models (LLMs) are not capable of multimodal input and output, resulting in inconsistent performance on multimodal tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal plan-following language model that integrates both textual plans and visual information to bring cross-modality to instructional tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on multimodal and textual dialogue in a plan-grounded setting. |
Open Grounded Planning: Challenges and Benchmark Construction (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on LLM-based planning uses language generation to produce free-style plans . however, these plans are not grounded in an executable set of actions . |
| Approach: | They propose a new task for open grounded planning that asks the model to generate an executable plan based on a variable action set. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task is open grounded planning, which is based on a set of variables. |
Symbolic Planning and Code Generation for Grounded Dialogue (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models excel at processing and generating text and code, but lack a grounded task-oriented dialogue system that can handle grounding. |
| Approach: | They propose a modular and interpretable grounded dialogue system that integrates a reader and planner to convert partner utterances into executable code and a symbolic planner to determine the next appropriate response. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system outperforms the existing state-of-the-art on a one-common dialogue task and improves task success in human evaluations from 56% to 69% in the most challenging setting. |
Thoughts to Target: Enhance Planning for Target-driven Conversation (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Empirical results demonstrate that our method significantly improves the planning ability of LLMs, especially in target-driven conversations. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-stage framework to improve the LLMs’ capability in planning conversations towards designated targets by distilling natural language plans from a target-driven conversation corpus and generating new plans with demonstration-guided in-context learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the ability of conversational models to plan towards designated targets and can be used to build extensive conversational AI. |
DuetSim: Building User Simulator with Dual Large Language Models for Task-Oriented Dialogues (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | User Simulators are used to train task-oriented dialogue systems . traditional training paradigms rely on human-engineered agendas resulting in generated responses that lack diversity and spontaneity. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages large language models to generate diverse responses . they use two LLMs to generate and verify responses, which are preferred by users . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework produces responses that exhibit diversity and are preferred by human users. |
Guardrails and Security for LLMs: Safe, Secure and Controllable Steering of LLM Applications (2025.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
Traian Rebedea, Leon Derczynski, Shaona Ghosh, Makesh Narsimhan Sreedhar, Faeze Brahman, Liwei Jiang, Bo Li, Yulia Tsvetkov, Christopher Parisien, Yejin Choi
| Challenge: | Pretrained generative models provide novel ways for users to interact with computers. |
| Approach: | This tutorial provides an overview of key guardrail mechanisms developed for LLMs along with evaluation methodologies and a detailed security assessment protocol. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial provides an overview of key guardrail mechanisms developed for LLMs, along with evaluation methodologies and a detailed security assessment protocol. |
Aligning Large Language Models for Controllable Recommendations (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing literature focuses on integrating domain-specific knowledge into LLMs to enhance accuracy using a fixed task template. |
| Approach: | They propose a collection of supervised learning tasks augmented with labels derived from a conventional recommender model to improve LLMs’ proficiency in adhering to recommendation-specific instructions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach significantly improves the capability of LLMs to respond to instructions within recommender systems, reducing formatting errors while maintaining a high level of accuracy. |
Planning Like Human: A Dual-process Framework for Dialogue Planning (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) operate in a reactive mode, often resulting in efficiency issues or suboptimal performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a dual-process dialogue planning framework that leverages the dual-process theory of human cognition and a deliberative Monte Carlo Tree Search mechanism to emulate human-like conversational dynamics. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods in achieving high-quality dialogues and operational efficiency. |
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Establishing Conversational Grounding (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | despite its importance, there has been limited research on conversational grounding in recent years . pre-trained language models have been costly and time-consuming to evaluate . |
| Approach: | They evaluate the performance of large language models in various aspects of conversational grounding . they propose ways to enhance the capabilities of the models that lag in this aspect . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performance is based on pre-trained language models and a large pre-training dataset. |