Ahmed Abdelali, Hamdy Mubarak, Shammur Chowdhury, Maram Hasanain, Basel Mousi, Sabri Boughorbel, Samir Abdaljalil, Yassine El Kheir, Daniel Izham, Fahim Dalvi, Majd Hawasly, Nizi Nazar, Youssef Elshahawy, Ahmed Ali, Nadir Durrani, Natasa Milic-Frayling, Firoj Alam
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly influenced the landscape of language and speech research. |
| Approach: | They used GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4, BLOOMZ, Jais-13b-chat, Whisper, and USM to tackle 33 distinct tasks across 61 datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms SOTA models in zero-shot learning, with a few exceptions. |
Similar Papers
Benchmarking Large Language Models for Persian: A Preliminary Study Focusing on ChatGPT (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
Amirhossein Abaskohi, Sara Baruni, Mostafa Masoudi, Nesa Abbasi, Mohammad Hadi Babalou, Ali Edalat, Sepehr Kamahi, Samin Mahdizadeh Sani, Nikoo Naghavian, Danial Namazifard, Pouya Sadeghi, Yadollah Yaghoobzadeh
| Challenge: | a new study examines the efficacy of large language models (LLMs) for Persian . ChatGPT and LLMs have shown remarkable performance in English, but their efficiency for low-resource languages remains an open question. |
| Approach: | They present a benchmarking study of large language models (LLMs) for Persian . they focus on GPT-3.5-turbo, but also GPT-4 and OpenChat-3.5 . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better in Persian than other low-resource languages . the study is the first comprehensive benchmarking of large language models . |
TounsiBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Tunisian Arabic (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a dataset of Tunisian Arabic instructions and prompts is used to evaluate LLMs' ability to understand and generate responses in Tunisia . we assess the quality, correctness, relevance, and dialectal adherence of LLM responses . |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for evaluating the capabilities of large language models in Tunisian Arabic . they use a dataset of Tunisia Arabic instructions and prompts to evaluate their models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can judge quality, correctness, relevance, and dialectal adherence . the model can also generate a leaderboard for the Tunisian Arabic language . |
Battle of the Large Language Models: Dolly vs LLaMA vs Vicuna vs Guanaco vs Bard vs ChatGPT - A Text-to-SQL Parsing Comparison (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a number of open-source large language models claim to be performing better than commercial ones . however, these models fall short of the performance achieved by closed-source models like GPT-3.5 . |
| Approach: | They evaluate six popular large language models against each other to evaluate their performance . authors say open-source models are not as effective as those built by commercial models . |
| Outcome: | a new set of models claim to match or surpass the language understanding abilities of commercial models . the results show that the models performed far below the performance of closed-source models compared to open-source ones . |
A Zero-shot and Few-shot Study of Instruction-Finetuned Large Language Models Applied to Clinical and Biomedical Tasks (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled advances in the field of natural language processing . however, their application and potential are still underexplored . |
| Approach: | They evaluate four state-of-the-art instruction-tuned Large Language Models on 13 NLP tasks in English. |
| Outcome: | The evaluated models outperform state-of-the-art models on 13 real-world clinical and biomedical NLP tasks in English. |
MEGAVERSE: Benchmarking Large Language Models Across Languages, Modalities, Models and Tasks (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Sanchit Ahuja, Divyanshu Aggarwal, Varun Gumma, Ishaan Watts, Ashutosh Sathe, Millicent Ochieng, Rishav Hada, Prachi Jain, Mohamed Ahmed, Kalika Bali, Sunayana Sitaram
| Challenge: | Several new LLMs have been introduced necessitating their evaluation on non-English languages. |
| Approach: | They perform a thorough evaluation of the non-English capabilities of SoTA LLMs by comparing them on the same set of multilingual datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms models on multilingual datasets on 22 languages including low-resource African languages. |
AraReasoner: Evaluating Reasoning-Based LLMs for Arabic NLP (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models have shown remarkable progress in reasoning abilities and general natural language processing tasks, yet their performance on Arabic data remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They compare reasoning-focused LLMs with deepSeek models across 15 Arabic NLP tasks . they use zero-shot, few-shot and fine-tuning to evaluate their capacity for linguistic reasoning . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models outperform strong models on Arabic datasets and are compared with other models. |
IrokoBench: A New Benchmark for African Languages in the Age of Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
David Ifeoluwa Adelani, Jessica Ojo, Israel Abebe Azime, Jian Yun Zhuang, Jesujoba Oluwadara Alabi, Xuanli He, Millicent Ochieng, Sara Hooker, Andiswa Bukula, En-Shiun Annie Lee, Chiamaka Ijeoma Chukwuneke, Happy Buzaaba, Blessing Kudzaishe Sibanda, Godson Koffi Kalipe, Jonathan Mukiibi, Salomon Kabongo Kabenamualu, Foutse Yuehgoh, Mmasibidi Setaka, Lolwethu Ndolela, Nkiruka Odu, Rooweither Mabuya, Salomey Osei, Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad, Sokhar Samb, Tadesse Kebede Guge, Tombekai Vangoni Sherman, Pontus Stenetorp
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are limited to a few high-resource languages . many low-resourced languages are evaluated only on basic text classification tasks . |
| Approach: | They propose to use IrokoBench to evaluate 17 low-resource African languages . they use human-translated benchmark datasets to evaluate zero-shot, few-shot and translate-test settings . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well in English and French, but the highest performing model perform poorly in proprietary models. |
Nahw: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Arabic Grammar Understanding, Error Detection, Correction, and Explanation (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing corpora address individual linguistic aspects like spelling or diacritization, but rarely provide explanations of grammatical errors. Existing datasets and benchmarks that capture Arabic's grammatological complexity are scarce. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for Arabic grammar that covers error detection, correction, and explanation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better on GPT-4o than on the best performing model (ALLaM-7B) despite fine tuning with synthetic data, the model perform better on Arabic grammar tasks. |
MEGA: Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AI (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Kabir Ahuja, Harshita Diddee, Rishav Hada, Millicent Ochieng, Krithika Ramesh, Prachi Jain, Akshay Nambi, Tanuja Ganu, Sameer Segal, Mohamed Ahmed, Kalika Bali, Sunayana Sitaram
| Challenge: | Large Large Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on many natural language processing tasks such as language understanding, reasoning, and language generation. |
| Approach: | They present a framework for evaluating generative LLMs in the multilingual setting and provide directions for future progress in the field. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates generative models on 16 NLP datasets across 70 typologically diverse languages and compares them to state-of-the-art non-autoregressive models. |
M5 – A Diverse Benchmark to Assess the Performance of Large Multimodal Models Across Multilingual and Multicultural Vision-Language Tasks (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models and their multimodal counterparts have shown significant performance disparities across different languages and cultural contexts. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate LLMs on diverse vision-language tasks within a multilingual and multicultural context using M5 benchmark. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks highlight task-agnostic performance disparities between languages and cultural contexts. |