VIEScore: Towards Explainable Metrics for Conditional Image Synthesis Evaluation (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing metrics for conditional image generation are opaque and lack explainability . evaluators of these metrics have limited ability to evaluate image synthesis tasks . |
| Approach: | They propose a Visual Instruction-guided Explainable metric for evaluating conditional image models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves a high Spearman correlation with human evaluations, but is weaker than GPT-4o and GPT-v in evaluating synthetic images. |
Similar Papers
Automatic Evaluation for Text-to-image Generation: Task-decomposed Framework, Distilled Training, and Meta-evaluation Benchmark (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing MLLMs rely on commercial models such as GPT-4o for evaluations, but they are not universally accessible. |
| Approach: | They propose a task decomposition evaluation framework based on GPT-4o to automatically construct a specialized training dataset to break down the multifaceted evaluation process into simpler sub-tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms the current state-of-the-art GPT-4o evaluation framework with over 4.6% improvement in Spearman and Kendall correlations with human judgments. |
A Unified Agentic Framework for Evaluating Conditional Image Generation (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jifang Wang, Yangxue Yangxue, Longyue Wang, Zhenran Xu, Yiyu Wang, Yaowei Wang, Weihua Luo, Kaifu Zhang, Baotian Hu, Min Zhang
| Challenge: | Conditional image generation is a popular and personalization-oriented task, but there are challenges in developing task-agnostic, reliable, and explainable evaluation metrics. |
| Approach: | They propose a unified agentic framework for comprehensive evaluation of conditional image generation tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves a high correlation with human assessments on seven prominent image generation tasks. |
INSTRUCTSCORE: Towards Explainable Text Generation Evaluation with Automatic Feedback (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to evaluate the quality of language generation do not provide explicit explanation of their verdicts. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained explainable evaluation metric for text generation that harnesses human instruction and implicit knowledge of GPT-4 to fine-tune it. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms all other unsupervised metrics on translation, captioning, data-to-text, and commonsense generation tasks. |
EXPERT: An Explainable Image Captioning Evaluation Metric with Structured Explanations (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on explainable evaluation metrics generate explanations without standardized criteria and the overall quality of the generated explanations remains unverified. |
| Approach: | They propose a reference-free evaluation metric that provides structured explanations based on fluency, relevance, and descriptiveness. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation template achieves state-of-the-art on benchmark datasets while providing significantly higher-quality explanations than existing metrics. |
Not All Errors are Equal: Learning Text Generation Metrics using Stratified Error Synthesis (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing learning metrics are limited to tasks where large human ratings are available. |
| Approach: | They propose a model-based natural language generation (NLG) evaluation metric that is highly correlated with human judgements without requiring human annotation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric outperforms all prior unsupervised metrics on multiple NLG tasks including translation, image captioning, and WebNLG text generation. |
VF-Eval: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs for Generating Feedback on AIGC Videos (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are used for video quality assessment, image captioning and video analysis. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate MLLMs on AIGC videos using coherence validation, error awareness, error type detection and reasoning evaluation tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates 13 frontier MLLMs on AIGC videos. |
FLEUR: An Explainable Reference-Free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning Using a Large Multimodal Model (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing image captioning evaluation metrics do not provide an explanation for the assigned numerical score. |
| Approach: | They propose an explainable reference-free metric to provide an explanation for captions . they introduce score smoothing to align as closely as possible with human judgment . |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric achieves high correlations with human judgment across image captioning evaluation benchmarks and is publicly available at https://github.com/Yebin46/FLEUR. |
SESCORE2: Learning Text Generation Evaluation via Synthesizing Realistic Mistakes (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing learned metrics perform unsatisfactory across text generation tasks or require human annotations for training on specific tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a self-supervised approach to train a model-based metric for text generation evaluation using sentences retrieved from a corpus. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms all prior unsupervised metrics on four text generation evaluation benchmarks, with an average Kendall improvement of 0.158. |
FaithScore: Fine-grained Evaluations of Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) lack the capacity to handle multimodal inputs effectively. |
| Approach: | They introduce a reference-free and fine-grained evaluation metric that measures the faithfulness of the generated free-form answers from large vision-language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric measures the faithfulness of free-form answers from large vision-language models. |
VizSeq: a visual analysis toolkit for text generation tasks (D19-3)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Several softwares for text evaluation are available that do not provide detailed examples. |
| Approach: | They propose a visual analysis toolkit for instance-level and corpus-level system evaluation on a wide variety of text generation tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed toolkit covers most common n-gram metrics and latest embedding-based metrics such as BERTScore. |