Challenge: Existing image captioning evaluation metrics do not provide an explanation for the assigned numerical score.
Approach: They propose an explainable reference-free metric to provide an explanation for captions . they introduce score smoothing to align as closely as possible with human judgment .
Outcome: The proposed metric achieves high correlations with human judgment across image captioning evaluation benchmarks and is publicly available at https://github.com/Yebin46/FLEUR.

Similar Papers

EXPERT: An Explainable Image Captioning Evaluation Metric with Structured Explanations (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on explainable evaluation metrics generate explanations without standardized criteria and the overall quality of the generated explanations remains unverified.
Approach: They propose a reference-free evaluation metric that provides structured explanations based on fluency, relevance, and descriptiveness.
Outcome: The proposed evaluation template achieves state-of-the-art on benchmark datasets while providing significantly higher-quality explanations than existing metrics.
VC-Inspector: Advancing Reference-free Evaluation of Video Captions with Factual Analysis (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing metrics for caption evaluation lack factual accuracy and limited context handling . VC-Inspector provides reproducible, fact-aware alternative that aligns closely with human judgments.
Approach: They propose a lightweight, open-source large multimodal model for reference-free evaluation of video captions with a focus on factual accuracy.
Outcome: Experiments show that VC-Inspector can generalize across diverse domains and improve on existing metrics.
CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning (2021.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Image captioning relies on reference-based automatic evaluations, but references are expensive to collect and comparing against multiple human-authored captions is insufficient.
Approach: They propose a reference-free metric that can be used for automatic caption evaluation without references.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms existing metrics on image-text compatibility and a reference-augmented version achieves even higher correlation with human judgements.
An Examination of the Robustness of Reference-Free Image Captioning Evaluation Metrics (2024.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have proposed reference-free evaluations of image captions . however, these approaches are restrictive and favor captions with similar vocabulary but different meanings.
Approach: They propose to use reference-free metrics to evaluate image captions . they propose to combine lexical overlap and semantics to identify fine-grained errors .
Outcome: The proposed metrics struggle to identify fine-grained errors, the authors show . CLIPScore, UMIC, and PAC-S are sensitive to variations in image-relevant objects mentioned in the caption .
CLAIR: Evaluating Image Captions with Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing measures for image caption evaluation fail to capture dimensions of similarity . a novel method that leverages the zero-shot language modeling capabilities of large language models (LLMs) demonstrates a stronger correlation with human judgments of caption quality compared to existing measures.
Approach: They propose a method that leverages the zero-shot language modeling capabilities of large language models to evaluate captions.
Outcome: The proposed method shows a stronger correlation with human judgments of caption quality compared to other measures.
Learning-based Composite Metrics for Improved Caption Evaluation (P18-3)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing image captioning metrics focus on linguistic aspects and do not match human judgements at sentence-level.
Approach: They propose to incorporate lexical and semantic metrics as features to capture adequacy and fluency of captions at different linguistic levels.
Outcome: The proposed framework captures adequacy and fluency of captions at different linguistic levels.
TIGEr: Text-to-Image Grounding for Image Caption Evaluation (D19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing metrics based on text-level comparisons fail to assess the quality of captions produced by machines.
Approach: They propose to use a machine-learned text-image grounding model to measure the accuracy of machine-generated captions and their correlation with human judgments.
Outcome: The proposed metric has higher consistency with human judgments and is more accurate than existing metrics.
InfoMetIC: An Informative Metric for Reference-free Image Caption Evaluation (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing image captioning metrics provide a single score to measure caption qualities, which are less explainable and informative.
Approach: They propose an Informative Metric for Reference-free Image Caption evaluation to support this feedback . they propose to provide a text precision score, a vision recall score and an overall quality score .
Outcome: The proposed method improves on existing metrics on multiple benchmarks and compares coarse-grained scores with human judgements.
VELA: An LLM-Hybrid-as-a-Judge Approach for Evaluating Long Image Captions (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation metrics for image captioning are primarily designed for short captions and are not suitable for long captions.
Approach: They propose an automatic evaluation metric for long captions developed within a novel LLM-Hybrid-as-a-Judge framework.
Outcome: The proposed metric outperforms existing metrics and achieves superhuman performance on LongCap-Arena.
CapArena: Benchmarking and Analyzing Detailed Image Captioning in the LLM Era (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Image captioning has been a challenge for vision-language researchers for decades . current VLMs focus on tasks like visual question answering (YA) but image captioning is not as advanced as expected.
Approach: They evaluate VLMs' performance on image captioning using human annotations . they find that some metrics show high caption-level agreement with humans .
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms open-source models on image captioning . it achieves 93.4% correlation with human rankings at $4 per test .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations