Challenge: Current abstractive summarization models generate inconsistent content due to the inherently noisy dataset and the discrepancy between maximum likelihood estimation based training objectives and consistency measurements.
Approach: They propose a new consistency taxonomy that categorizes inconsistent content into faithfulness, factuality, and self-supportiveness.
Outcome: Experiments on XSUM and CNN/DM datasets show that EnergySum mitigates the trade-off between accuracy and consistency.

Similar Papers

Questioning the Validity of Summarization Datasets and Improving Their Factual Consistency (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Abstractive summarization systems have a lack of a defined definition for the task . factual consistency is a key factor in summarizing, but there are still deficiencies . a new study shows that summarized summarisation models achieve improved performance .
Approach: They propose a filtered summarization dataset with improved factual consistency to address this problem . they argue that the dataset should become a valid benchmark for developing and evaluating summarizing systems .
Outcome: The proposed model improves on a popular summarization dataset with improved factual consistency.
Falsesum: Generating Document-level NLI Examples for Recognizing Factual Inconsistency in Summarization (2022.naacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Neural abstractive summarization models generate factually inconsistent summaries . previous work has introduced the task of recognizing factual inconsistency as a downstream application of natural language inference (NLI).
Approach: They propose a data generation pipeline that enables a task-oriented approach to detect factual inconsistencies in abstractive summarization models.
Outcome: The proposed model improves the state-of-the-art performance across four benchmarks for recognizing factual inconsistency in generated summaries.
Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a weakly-supervised approach is needed to verify factual consistency . auxiliary span extraction tasks are useful for verifying factual consistent summaries .
Approach: They propose a weakly-supervised approach for verifying factual consistency . they transfer the model to summaries generated by several neural models .
Outcome: The proposed approach outperforms models trained with strong supervision on source documents and human evaluations.
SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarization (2022.tacl-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have shown that even state-of-the-art pre-trained language models can generate inconsistent summaries in more than 70% of all cases.
Approach: They propose a method that enables NLI models to be used for inconsistency detection by segmenting documents into sentence units and aggregating scores between pairs of sentences.
Outcome: The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy of 74.4% on six large inconsistency detection datasets.
Multilingual Summarization with Factual Consistency Evaluation (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Abstractive summarization models generate factually inconsistent summaries, reducing their utility for real-world applications.
Approach: They propose to use data filtering and controlled generation to detect hallucinations in machine generated summaries.
Outcome: The proposed models detect factual inconsistencies in machine generated summaries, but they focus on English only.
Factually Consistent Summarization via Reinforcement Learning with Textual Entailment Feedback (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in abstractive summarization systems produce factually inconsistent text . this is emphasized in tasks like summarizing, which often produce inconsistent text with no input article .
Approach: They use reinforcement learning to optimize for factual consistency and explore trade-offs . they use textual-entailment rewards to optimize the accuracy of the generated summaries .
Outcome: The proposed method improves faithfulness, salience and conciseness of the generated summaries.
Factual Consistency Evaluation for Text Summarization via Counterfactual Estimation (2021.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to evaluate factual consistency in text summarization neglect the intrinsic cause of factual inconsistency or rely on auxiliary tasks.
Approach: They propose a method to evaluate the factual consistency in text summarization via counterfactual estimation, which formulates the causal relationship between source document, generated summary, and the language prior.
Outcome: The proposed metric improves correlation with human judgments and convenience of usage on three public abstractive text summarization datasets.
Improving Factual Consistency of Abstractive Summarization via Question Answering (2021.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies show that about 30% of summaries generated by neural text summarization suffer from fact fabrication.
Approach: They propose an automatic evaluation metric to measure factual consistency and a learning algorithm that maximizes the metric during model training.
Outcome: The proposed method improves factual consistency and overall quality of summarization models.
Entity-level Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization (2021.eacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models exhibit entity hallucination, generating names of entities that are not present in the source document.
Approach: They propose to use entity-level factual consistency to improve model quality . they propose to filter the training data to reduce entity hallucination problem .
Outcome: The proposed model can reduce the entity hallucination problem by filtering the training data.
SummaCoz: A Dataset for Improving the Interpretability of Factual Consistency Detection for Summarization (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Summarization is an important application of Large Language Models.
Approach: They integrate human-annotated and model-generated natural language explanations to elucidate how a summary deviates and becomes inconsistent with its source article.
Outcome: The proposed model provides rationales for its judgments and improves its accuracy significantly.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations