Long to reign over us: A Case Study of Machine Translation and a New Monarch (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | We examine translations between French and English in contexts with ambiguity . with the passing of Queen Elizabeth II, MT systems can produce errors due to linguistic features of both languages and the paucity of references to kings in the training data. |
| Approach: | They examine translations between French and English as they were produced by MT systems . they find that even when human translators would have adequate context, machine translation systems do not always produce the expected output. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model shows that even when human translators have context, machine translation systems do not always produce the expected output. |
Similar Papers
Analysing Coreference in Transformer Outputs (D19-65)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using a transformer architecture, we study coreference phenomena in three neural machine translation systems. |
| Approach: | They analyse coreference phenomena in three neural machine translation systems . they manually annotate (the possibly incorrect) coreference chains in the outputs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model shows stronger translationese effects in machine translated outputs than in human translations. |
Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Discourse in Machine Translation (DiscoMT 2019) (D19-65)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | . - (EN) |
| Approach: | . - (EN) |
| Outcome: | . - (EN) |
Toward Machine Interpreting: Lessons from Human Interpreting Studies (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current speech translation systems are static and do not adapt to real-world situations in ways human interpreters do. |
| Approach: | They propose to model human interpreting using a new language model to improve usability . they argue that there is great potential to adopt many human interpreted principles . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can be used to improve human interpreting and improve translation performance. |
Exploring Document-Level Literary Machine Translation with Parallel Paragraphs from World Literature (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Katherine Thai, Marzena Karpinska, Kalpesh Krishna, Bill Ray, Moira Inghilleri, John Wieting, Mohit Iyyer
| Challenge: | Literary translation is a culturally significant task, but it is bottlenecked by the small number of qualified literary translators . a dataset of non-English language novels is used to study literary MT . |
| Approach: | They use a dataset of non-English language novels aligned to human and automatic English translations to study literary MT. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model prefers human translations over machine translations at a rate of 84% . state-of-the-art MT metrics do not correlate with preferences, the study finds . |
Translation in the Hands of Many: Centering Lay Users in Machine Translation Interactions (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multilingual demands and accessibility have made MT a global tool . however, the understanding of MT consumed by such a diverse group of users remains limited. |
| Approach: | They first trace the evolution of MT user profiles, focusing on non-experts and how their engagement with technology may shift with the rise of LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach will help to align MT with user needs and improve the quality of the language. |
Human or Neural Translation? (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Shivendra Bhardwaj, David Alfonso Hermelo, Phillippe Langlais, Gabriel Bernier-Colborne, Cyril Goutte, Michel Simard
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that deep neural models have improved machine translation . identifying machine translation is still feasible, but is not yet known. |
| Approach: | They train and apply deep neural models to distinguish between human and machine translations . they use a monolingual and bilingual task to train and train 18 classifiers based on their results . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves the ability to distinguish between human and machine translations at the sentence level. |
Many-to-English Machine Translation Tools, Data, and Pretrained Models (2021.acl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Commercial translation systems support only one hundred languages or fewer . commercial translation systems do not make these models available for transfer to low resource languages . |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual neural machine translation model that can translate from 500 source languages to English. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can translate from 500 source languages to English, or be used as a parent model for low-resource languages. |
Selecting Machine-Translated Data for Quick Bootstrapping of a Natural Language Understanding System (N18-3)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In recent years, there has been growing interest in voice-controlled devices, such as Amazon Alexa or Google home. |
| Approach: | They investigate the use of Machine Translation to bootstrap a natural language understanding system for a new language for the use case of a large-scale voice-controlled device. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces the time and cost of getting annotated corpus for a new language while still providing a large enough coverage of user requests. |
Evaluating Automatic Metrics with Incremental Machine Translation Systems (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have shown that neural metrics are more reliable than non-neural metrics. |
| Approach: | They propose to use commercial machine translations to evaluate machine translation metrics based on their preference for more recent outputs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset confirms several previous findings, including the advantage of neural metrics over non-neural ones, and also explores the debated issue of how MT quality affects metric reliability. |
Tagged Back-translation Revisited: Why Does It Really Work? (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this paper, we show that neural machine translation systems trained on large back-translated data overfit some of the characteristics of machine-transcribed texts. |
| Approach: | They propose to add a tag to back-translations to help distinguish back-translated data from original parallel training data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed tag helps the system distinguish back-translated data from original parallel training data and is as effective as a tag in high-resource training. |